- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Sanders, Stephan J."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Systematic evaluation of genome sequencing for the diagnostic assessment of autism spectrum disorder and fetal structural anomalies(Elsevier, 2023) Lowther, Chelsea; Valkanas, Elise; Giordano, Jessica L.; Wang, Harold Z.; Currall, Benjamin B.; O'Keefe, Kathryn; Pierce-Hoffman, Emma; Kurtas, Nehir E.; Whelan, Christopher W.; Hao, Stephanie P.; Weisburd, Ben; Jalili, Vahid; Fu, Jack; Wong, Isaac; Collins, Ryan L.; Zhao, Xuefang; Austin-Tse, Christina A.; Evangelista, Emily; Lemire, Gabrielle; Aggarwal, Vimla S.; Lucente, Diane; Gauthier, Laura D.; Tolonen, Charlotte; Sahakian, Nareh; Stevens, Christine; An, Joon-Yong; Dong, Shan; Norton, Mary E.; MacKenzie, Tippi C.; Devlin, Bernie; Gilmore, Kelly; Powell, Bradford C.; Brandt, Alicia; Vetrini, Francesco; DiVito, Michelle; Sanders, Stephan J.; MacArthur, Daniel G.; Hodge, Jennelle C.; O'Donnell-Luria, Anne; Rehm, Heidi L.; Vora, Neeta L.; Levy, Brynn; Brand, Harrison; Wapner, Ronald J.; Talkowski, Michael E.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineShort-read genome sequencing (GS) holds the promise of becoming the primary diagnostic approach for the assessment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and fetal structural anomalies (FSAs). However, few studies have comprehensively evaluated its performance against current standard-of-care diagnostic tests: karyotype, chromosomal microarray (CMA), and exome sequencing (ES). To assess the clinical utility of GS, we compared its diagnostic yield against these three tests in 1,612 quartet families including an individual with ASD and in 295 prenatal families. Our GS analytic framework identified a diagnostic variant in 7.8% of ASD probands, almost 2-fold more than CMA (4.3%) and 3-fold more than ES (2.7%). However, when we systematically captured copy-number variants (CNVs) from the exome data, the diagnostic yield of ES (7.4%) was brought much closer to, but did not surpass, GS. Similarly, we estimated that GS could achieve an overall diagnostic yield of 46.1% in unselected FSAs, representing a 17.2% increased yield over karyotype, 14.1% over CMA, and 4.1% over ES with CNV calling or 36.1% increase without CNV discovery. Overall, GS provided an added diagnostic yield of 0.4% and 0.8% beyond the combination of all three standard-of-care tests in ASD and FSAs, respectively. This corresponded to nine GS unique diagnostic variants, including sequence variants in exons not captured by ES, structural variants (SVs) inaccessible to existing standard-of-care tests, and SVs where the resolution of GS changed variant classification. Overall, this large-scale evaluation demonstrated that GS significantly outperforms each individual standard-of-care test while also outperforming the combination of all three tests, thus warranting consideration as the first-tier diagnostic approach for the assessment of ASD and FSAs.Item The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2024: phenotypes around the world(Oxford University Press, 2024) Gargano, Michael A.; Matentzoglu, Nicolas; Coleman, Ben; Addo-Lartey, Eunice B.; Anagnostopoulos, Anna V.; Anderton, Joel; Avillach, Paul; Bagley, Anita M.; Bakštein, Eduard; Balhoff, James P.; Baynam, Gareth; Bello, Susan M.; Berk, Michael; Bertram, Holli; Bishop, Somer; Blau, Hannah; Bodenstein, David F.; Botas, Pablo; Boztug, Kaan; Čady, Jolana; Callahan, Tiffany J.; Cameron, Rhiannon; Carbon, Seth J.; Castellanos, Francisco; Caufield, J. Harry; Chan, Lauren E.; Chute, Christopher G.; Cruz-Rojo, Jaime; Dahan-Oliel, Noémi; Davids, Jon R.; de Dieuleveult, Maud; de Souza, Vinicius; de Vries, Bert B. A.; de Vries, Esther; DePaulo, J. Raymond; Derfalvi, Beata; Dhombres, Ferdinand; Diaz-Byrd, Claudia; Dingemans, Alexander J. M.; Donadille, Bruno; Duyzend, Michael; Elfeky, Reem; Essaid, Shahim; Fabrizzi, Carolina; Fico, Giovanna; Firth, Helen V.; Freudenberg-Hua, Yun; Fullerton, Janice M.; Gabriel, Davera L.; Gilmour, Kimberly; Giordano, Jessica; Goes, Fernando S.; Gore Moses, Rachel; Green, Ian; Griese, Matthias; Groza, Tudor; Gu, Weihong; Guthrie, Julia; Gyori, Benjamin; Hamosh, Ada; Hanauer, Marc; Hanušová, Kateřina; He, Yongqun Oliver; Hegde, Harshad; Helbig, Ingo; Holasová, Kateřina; Hoyt, Charles Tapley; Huang, Shangzhi; Hurwitz, Eric; Jacobsen, Julius O. B.; Jiang, Xiaofeng; Joseph, Lisa; Keramatian, Kamyar; King, Bryan; Knoflach, Katrin; Koolen, David A.; Kraus, Megan L.; Kroll, Carlo; Kusters, Maaike; Ladewig, Markus S.; Lagorce, David; Lai, Meng-Chuan; Lapunzina, Pablo; Laraway, Bryan; Lewis-Smith, David; Li, Xiarong; Lucano, Caterina; Majd, Marzieh; Marazita, Mary L.; Martinez-Glez, Victor; McHenry, Toby H.; McInnis, Melvin G.; McMurry, Julie A.; Mihulová, Michaela; Millett, Caitlin E.; Mitchell, Philip B.; Moslerová, Veronika; Narutomi, Kenji; Nematollahi, Shahrzad; Nevado, Julian; Nierenberg, Andrew A.; Novák Čajbiková, Nikola; Nurnberger, John I., Jr.; Ogishima, Soichi; Olson, Daniel; Ortiz, Abigail; Pachajoa, Harry; Perez de Nanclares, Guiomar; Peters, Amy; Putman, Tim; Rapp, Christina K.; Rath, Ana; Reese, Justin; Rekerle, Lauren; Roberts, Angharad M.; Roy, Suzy; Sanders, Stephan J.; Schuetz, Catharina; Schulte, Eva C.; Schulze, Thomas G.; Schwarz, Martin; Scott, Katie; Seelow, Dominik; Seitz, Berthold; Shen, Yiping; Similuk, Morgan N.; Simon, Eric S.; Singh, Balwinder; Smedley, Damian; Smith, Cynthia L.; Smolinsky, Jake T.; Sperry, Sarah; Stafford, Elizabeth; Stefancsik, Ray; Steinhaus, Robin; Strawbridge, Rebecca; Sundaramurthi, Jagadish Chandrabose; Talapova, Polina; Tenorio Castano, Jair A.; Tesner, Pavel; Thomas, Rhys H.; Thurm, Audrey; Turnovec, Marek; van Gijn, Marielle E.; Vasilevsky, Nicole A.; Vlčková, Markéta; Walden, Anita; Wang, Kai; Wapner, Ron; Ware, James S.; Wiafe, Addo A.; Wiafe, Samuel A.; Wiggins, Lisa D.; Williams, Andrew E.; Wu, Chen; Wyrwoll, Margot J.; Xiong, Hui; Yalin, Nefize; Yamamoto, Yasunori; Yatham, Lakshmi N.; Yocum, Anastasia K.; Young, Allan H.; Yüksel, Zafer; Zandi, Peter P.; Zankl, Andreas; Zarante, Ignacio; Zvolský, Miroslav; Toro, Sabrina; Carmody, Leigh C.; Harris, Nomi L.; Munoz-Torres, Monica C.; Danis, Daniel; Mungall, Christopher J.; Köhler, Sebastian; Haendel, Melissa A.; Robinson, Peter N.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineThe Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) is a widely used resource that comprehensively organizes and defines the phenotypic features of human disease, enabling computational inference and supporting genomic and phenotypic analyses through semantic similarity and machine learning algorithms. The HPO has widespread applications in clinical diagnostics and translational research, including genomic diagnostics, gene-disease discovery, and cohort analytics. In recent years, groups around the world have developed translations of the HPO from English to other languages, and the HPO browser has been internationalized, allowing users to view HPO term labels and in many cases synonyms and definitions in ten languages in addition to English. Since our last report, a total of 2239 new HPO terms and 49235 new HPO annotations were developed, many in collaboration with external groups in the fields of psychiatry, arthrogryposis, immunology and cardiology. The Medical Action Ontology (MAxO) is a new effort to model treatments and other measures taken for clinical management. Finally, the HPO consortium is contributing to efforts to integrate the HPO and the GA4GH Phenopacket Schema into electronic health records (EHRs) with the goal of more standardized and computable integration of rare disease data in EHRs.