Browsing by Author "Salgado, Roberto"

Now showing 1 - 10 of 11
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration
    (Wiley, 2019-08) Leung, Samuel C. Y.; Nielsen, Torsten O.; Zabaglo, Lila A.; Arun, Indu; Badve, Sunil S.; Bane, Anita L.; Bartlett, John M. S.; Borgquist, Signe; Chang, Martin C.; Dodson, Andrew; Ehinger, Anna; Fineberg, Susan; Focke, Cornelia M.; Gao, Dongxia; Gown, Allen M.; Gutierrez, Carolina; Hugh, Judith C.; Kos, Zuzana; Lænkholm, Anne-Vibeke; Mastropasqua, Mauro G.; Moriya, Takuya; Nofech-Mozes, Sharon; Osborne, C. Kent; Penault-Llorca, Frédérique M.; Piper, Tammy; Sakatani, Takashi; Salgado, Roberto; Starczynski, Jane; Sugie, Tomoharu; van der Vegt, Bert; Viale, Giuseppe; Hayes, Daniel F.; McShane, Lisa M.; Dowsett, Mitch; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Aims The nuclear proliferation marker Ki67 assayed by immunohistochemistry has multiple potential uses in breast cancer, but an unacceptable level of interlaboratory variability has hampered its clinical utility. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group has undertaken a systematic programme to determine whether Ki67 measurement can be analytically validated and standardised among laboratories. This study addresses whether acceptable scoring reproducibility can be achieved on excision whole sections. Methods and results Adjacent sections from 30 primary ER+ breast cancers were centrally stained for Ki67 and sections were circulated among 23 pathologists in 12 countries. All pathologists scored Ki67 by two methods: (i) global: four fields of 100 tumour cells each were selected to reflect observed heterogeneity in nuclear staining; (ii) hot‐spot: the field with highest apparent Ki67 index was selected and up to 500 cells scored. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the global method [confidence interval (CI) = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.799–0.93] marginally met the prespecified success criterion (lower 95% CI ≥ 0.8), while the ICC for the hot‐spot method (0.83; 95% CI = 0.74–0.90) did not. Visually, interobserver concordance in location of selected hot‐spots varies between cases. The median times for scoring were 9 and 6 min for global and hot‐spot methods, respectively. Conclusions The global scoring method demonstrates adequate reproducibility to warrant next steps towards evaluation for technical and clinical validity in appropriate cohorts of cases. The time taken for scoring by either method is practical using counting software we are making publicly available. Establishment of external quality assessment schemes is likely to improve the reproducibility between laboratories further.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analytical validation of a standardized scoring protocol for Ki67: phase 3 of an international multicenter collaboration
    (Nature, 2016) Leung, Samuel C. Y.; Nielsen, Torsten O.; Zabaglo, Lila; Arun, Indu; Badve, Sunil S.; Bane, Anita L.; Bartlett, John M. S.; Borgquist, Signe; Chang, Martin C.; Dodson, Andrew; Enos, Rebecca A.; Fineberg, Susan; Focke, Cornelia M.; Gao, Dongxia; Gown, Allen M.; Grabau, Dorthe; Gutierrez, Carolina; Hugh, Judith C.; Kos, Zuzana; Lænkholm, Anne-Vibeke; Lin, Ming-Gang; Mastropasqua, Mauro G.; Moriya, Takuya; Nofech-Mozes, Sharon; Osborne, C. Kent; Penault-Llorca, Frédérique M.; Piper, Tammy; Sakatani, Takashi; Salgado, Roberto; Starczynski, Jane; Viale, Giuseppe; Hayes, Daniel F.; McShane, Lisa M.; Dowsett, Mitch; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Pathological analysis of the nuclear proliferation biomarker Ki67 has multiple potential roles in breast and other cancers. However, clinical utility of the immunohistochemical (IHC) assay for Ki67 immunohistochemistry has been hampered by unacceptable between-laboratory analytical variability. The International Ki67 Working Group has conducted a series of studies aiming to decrease this variability and improve the evaluation of Ki67. This study tries to assess whether acceptable performance can be achieved on prestained core-cut biopsies using a standardized scoring method. Sections from 30 primary ER+ breast cancer core biopsies were centrally stained for Ki67 and circulated among 22 laboratories in 11 countries. Each laboratory scored Ki67 using three methods: (1) global (4 fields of 100 cells each); (2) weighted global (same as global but weighted by estimated percentages of total area); and (3) hot-spot (single field of 500 cells). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), a measure of interlaboratory agreement, for the unweighted global method (0.87; 95% credible interval (CI): 0.81–0.93) met the prespecified success criterion for scoring reproducibility, whereas that for the weighted global (0.87; 95% CI: 0.7999–0.93) and hot-spot methods (0.84; 95% CI: 0.77–0.92) marginally failed to do so. The unweighted global assessment of Ki67 IHC analysis on core biopsies met the prespecified criterion of success for scoring reproducibility. A few cases still showed large scoring discrepancies. Establishment of external quality assessment schemes is likely to improve the agreement between laboratories further. Additional evaluations are needed to assess staining variability and clinical validity in appropriate cohorts of samples.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessing tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in solid tumors: a practical review for pathologists and proposal for a standardized method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 1: Assessing the host immune response, TILs in invasive breast carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ, metastatic tumor deposits and areas for further research
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2017-09) Hendry, Shona; Salgado, Roberto; Gevaert, Thomas; Russell, Prudence; John, Tom; Thapa, Bibhusal; Christie, Michael; van de Vijver, Koen; Estrada, M. V.; Gonzalez-Ericsson, Paula; Sanders, Melinda; Soloman, Benjamin; Solinas, Cinzia; Van den Eynden, Gert; Allory, Yves; Preusser, Matthias; Hainfellner, Johannes; Pruneri, Giancarlo; Vingiani, Andrea; Demaria, Sandra; Symmans, Fraser; Nuciforo, Paolo; Comerma, Laura; Thompson, E. A.; Lakhani, Sunil; Kim, Seong-Rim; Schnitt, Stuart; Colpaert, Cecile; Sotiriou, Christos; Scherer, Stefan; Ignatiadis, Michail; Badve, Sunil S.; Pierce, Robert; Viale, Giuseppe; Sirtaine, Nicolas; Penault-Llorca, Frederique; Sugie, Tomohagu; Fineberg, Susan; Paik, Soonmyung; Srinivasan, Ashok; Richardson, Andrea; Wang, Yihong; Chmielik, Ewa; Brock, Jane; Johnson, Douglas; Balko, Justin; Wienert, Stephan; Bossuyt, Veerle; Michiels, Stefan; Ternes, Nils; Burchardi, Nicole; Luen, Stephen; Savas, Peter; Klauschen, Frederick; Watson, Peter; Nelson, Brad; Criscitiello, Carmen; O'Toole, Sandra; Larsimont, Denis; de Wind, Roland; Curigliano, Giuseppe; André, Fabrice; Lacroix-Triki, Magali; van de Vijver, Mark; Rojo, Federico; Floris, Giuseppe; Bedri, Shahinaz; Sparano, Joseph; Rimm, David; Nielsen, Torsten; Kos, Zuzana; Hewitt, Stephen; Singh, Baljit; Farshid, Gelareh; Loibl, Sibylle; Allison, Kimberly; Tung, Nadine; Adams, Sylvia; Willard-Gallo, Karen; Horlings, Hugo; Gandhi, Leena; Moreira, Andre; Hirsch, Fred; Dieci, Maria; Urbanowicz, Maria; Brcic, Iva; Korski, Konstanty; Gaire, Fabien; Koeppen, Hartmut; Lo, Amy; Giltnane, Jennifer; Rebelatto, Marlon; Steele, Keith; Zha, Jiping; Emancipator, Kenneth; Juco, Jonathan; Denkert, Carsten; Reis-Filho, Jorge; Loi, Sherene; Fox, Stephen; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in histopathologic specimens can provide important prognostic information in diverse solid tumor types, and may also be of value in predicting response to treatments. However, implementation as a routine clinical biomarker has not yet been achieved. As successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other forms of immunotherapy become a clinical reality, the need for widely applicable, accessible, and reliable immunooncology biomarkers is clear. In part 1 of this review we briefly discuss the host immune response to tumors and different approaches to TIL assessment. We propose a standardized methodology to assess TILs in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines for TIL assessment in invasive breast carcinoma. A review of the literature regarding the value of TIL assessment in different solid tumor types follows in part 2. The method we propose is reproducible, affordable, easily applied, and has demonstrated prognostic and predictive significance in invasive breast carcinoma. This standardized methodology may be used as a reference against which other methods are compared, and should be evaluated for clinical validity and utility. Standardization of TIL assessment will help to improve consistency and reproducibility in this field, enrich both the quality and quantity of comparable evidence, and help to thoroughly evaluate the utility of TILs assessment in this era of immunotherapy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group Part 2 TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2017-11) Hendry, Shona; Salgado, Roberto; Gevaert, Thomas; Russell, Prudence A.; John, Tom; Thapa, Bibhusal; Christie, Michael; van de Vijver, Koen; Estrada, M. V.; Gonzalez-Ericsson, Paula I.; Sanders, Melinda; Solomon, Benjamin; Solinas, Cinzia; Van den Eynden, Gert G. G. M.; Allory, Yves; Preusser, Matthias; Hainfellner, Johannes; Pruneri, Giancarlo; Vingiani, Andrea; Demaria, Sandra; Symmans, Fraser; Nuciforo, Paolo; Comermo, Laura; Thompson, E. A.; Lakhani, Sunil; Kim, Seong-Rim; Schnitt, Stuart; Colpaert, Cecile; Sotiriou, Christos; Scherer, Stefan J.; Ignatiadis, Michail; Badve, Sunil S.; Pierce, Robert H.; Viale, Giuseppe; Sirtaine, Nicolas; Penault-Llorca, Frederique; Sugie, Tomohagu; Fineberg, Susan; Paik, Soonmyung; Srinivasan, Ashok; Richardson, Andrea; Wang, Yihong; Chmielik, Ewa; Brock, Jane; Johnson, Douglas B.; Balko, Justin; Wienert, Stephan; Bossuyt, Veerle; Michiels, Stefan; Ternes, Nils; Burchardi, Nicole; Luen, Stephen J.; Savas, Peter; Klauschen, Frederick; Watson, Peter H.; Nelson, Brad H.; Criscitiello, Carmen; O'Toole, Sandra; Larsimont, Denis; de Wind, Roland; Curigliano, Giuseppe; André, Fabrice; Lacroix-Triki, Magali; van de Vijver, Mark; Rojo, Federico; Floris, Giuseppe; Bedri, Shahinaz; Sparano, Joseph; Rimm, David; Nielsen, Torsten; Kos, Zuzana; Hewitt, Stephen; Singh, Baljit; Farshid, Gelareh; Loibl, Sibylle; Allison, Kimberly H.; Tung, Nadine; Adams, Sylvia; Willard-Gallo, Karen; Horlings, Hugo M.; Gandhi, Leena; Moreira, Andre; Hirsch, Fred; Dieci, Maria V.; Urbanowicz, Maria; Brcic, Iva; Korski, Konstanty; Gaire, Fabien; Koeppen, Hartmut; Lo, Amy; Giltnane, Jennifer; Rebelatto, Marlon C.; Steele, Keith E.; Zha, Jiping; Emancipator, Kenneth; Juco, Jonathan W.; Denkert, Carsten; Reis-Filho, Jorge; Loi, Sherene; Fox, Stephen B.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Assessment of the immune response to tumors is growing in importance as the prognostic implications of this response are increasingly recognized, and as immunotherapies are evaluated and implemented in different tumor types. However, many different approaches can be used to assess and describe the immune response, which limits efforts at implementation as a routine clinical biomarker. In part 1 of this review, we have proposed a standardized methodology to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in solid tumors, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group guidelines for invasive breast carcinoma. In part 2 of this review, we discuss the available evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of TILs in common solid tumors, including carcinomas of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary system, gynecologic system, and head and neck, as well as primary brain tumors, mesothelioma and melanoma. The particularities and different emphases in TIL assessment in different tumor types are discussed. The standardized methodology we propose can be adapted to different tumor types and may be used as a standard against which other approaches can be compared. Standardization of TIL assessment will help clinicians, researchers and pathologists to conclusively evaluate the utility of this simple biomarker in the current era of immunotherapy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group
    (Oxford University Press, 2021) Nielsen, Torsten O.; Leung, Samuel C. Y.; Rimm, David L.; Dodson, Andrew; Acs, Balazs; Badve, Sunil; Denkert, Carsten; Ellis, Matthew J.; Fineberg, Susan; Flowers, Margaret; Kreipe, Hans H.; Laenkholm, Anne-Vibeke; Pan, Hongchao; Penault-Llorca, Frédérique M.; Polley, Mei-Yin; Salgado, Roberto; Smith, Ian E.; Sugie, Tomoharu; Bartlett, John M. S.; McShane, Lisa M.; Dowsett, Mitch; Hayes, Daniel F.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC), commonly used as a proliferation marker in breast cancer, has limited value for treatment decisions due to questionable analytical validity. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) consensus meeting, held in October 2019, assessed the current evidence for Ki67 IHC analytical validity and clinical utility in breast cancer, including the series of scoring studies the IKWG conducted on centrally stained tissues. Consensus observations and recommendations are: 1) as for estrogen receptor and HER2 testing, preanalytical handling considerations are critical; 2) a standardized visual scoring method has been established and is recommended for adoption; 3) participation in and evaluation of quality assurance and quality control programs is recommended to maintain analytical validity; and 4) the IKWG accepted that Ki67 IHC as a prognostic marker in breast cancer has clinical validity but concluded that clinical utility is evident only for prognosis estimation in anatomically favorable estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative patients to identify those who do not need adjuvant chemotherapy. In this T1-2, N0-1 patient group, the IKWG consensus is that Ki67 5% or less, or 30% or more, can be used to estimate prognosis. In conclusion, analytical validity of Ki67 IHC can be reached with careful attention to preanalytical issues and calibrated standardized visual scoring. Currently, clinical utility of Ki67 IHC in breast cancer care remains limited to prognosis assessment in stage I or II breast cancer. Further development of automated scoring might help to overcome some current limitations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ESMO / ASCO Recommendations for a Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology Edition 2016
    (BMJ Publishing Group, 2016) Dittrich, Christian; Kosty, Michael; Jezdic, Svetlana; Pyle, Doug; Berardi, Rossana; Bergh, Jonas; El-Saghir, Nagi; Lotz, Jean-Pierre; Österlund, Pia; Pavlidis, Nicholas; Purkalne, Gunta; Awada, Ahmad; Banerjee, Susana; Bhatia, Smita; Bogaerts, Jan; Buckner, Jan; Cardoso, Fatima; Casali, Paolo; Chu, Edward; Close, Julia Lee; Coiffier, Bertrand; Connolly, Roisin; Coupland, Sarah; De Petris, Luigi; De Santis, Maria; de Vries, Elisabeth G. E.; Dizon, Don S.; Duff, Jennifer; Duska, Linda R.; Eniu, Alexandru; Ernstoff, Marc; Felip, Enriqueta; Fey, Martin F.; Gilbert, Jill; Girard, Nicolas; Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.; Gopalan, Priya K.; Grothey, Axel; Hahn, Stephen M.; Hanna, Diana; Herold, Christian; Herrstedt, Jørn; Homicsko, Krisztian; Jones, Dennie V.; Jost, Lorenz; Keilholz, Ulrich; Khan, Saad; Kiss, Alexander; Köhne, Claus-Henning; Kunstfeld, Rainer; Lenz, Heinz-Josef; Lichtman, Stuart; Licitra, Lisa; Lion, Thomas; Litière, Saskia; Liu, Lifang; Loehrer, Patrick J.; Markham, Merry Jennifer; Markman, Ben; Mayerhoefer, Marius; Meran, Johannes G.; Michielin, Olivier; Moser, Elizabeth Charlotte; Mountzios, Giannis; Moynihan, Timothy; Nielsen, Torsten; Ohe, Yuichiro; Öberg, Kjell; Palumbo, Antonio; Peccatori, Fedro Alessandro; Pfeilstöcker, Michael; Raut, Chandrajit; Remick, Scot C.; Robson, Mark; Rutkowski, Piotr; Salgado, Roberto; Schapira, Lidia; Schernhammer, Eva; Schlumberger, Martin; Schmoll, Hans-Joachim; Schnipper, Lowell; Sessa, Cristiana; Shapiro, Charles L.; Steele, Julie; Sternberg, Cora N.; Stiefel, Friedrich; Strasser, Florian; Stupp, Roger; Sullivan, Richard; Tabernero, Josep; Travado, Luzia; Verheij, Marcel; Voest, Emile; Vokes, Everett; Von Roenn, Jamie; Weber, Jeffrey S.; Wildiers, Hans; Yarden, Yosef; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine
    The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) are publishing a new edition of the ESMO/ASCO Global Curriculum (GC) thanks to contribution of 64 ESMO-appointed and 32 ASCO-appointed authors. First published in 2004 and updated in 2010, the GC edition 2016 answers to the need for updated recommendations for the training of physicians in medical oncology by defining the standard to be fulfilled to qualify as medical oncologists. At times of internationalisation of healthcare and increased mobility of patients and physicians, the GC aims to provide state-of-the-art cancer care to all patients wherever they live. Recent progress in the field of cancer research has indeed resulted in diagnostic and therapeutic innovations such as targeted therapies as a standard therapeutic approach or personalised cancer medicine apart from the revival of immunotherapy, requiring specialised training for medical oncology trainees. Thus, several new chapters on technical contents such as molecular pathology, translational research or molecular imaging and on conceptual attitudes towards human principles like genetic counselling or survivorship have been integrated in the GC. The GC edition 2016 consists of 12 sections with 17 subsections, 44 chapters and 35 subchapters, respectively. Besides renewal in its contents, the GC underwent a principal formal change taking into consideration modern didactic principles. It is presented in a template-based format that subcategorises the detailed outcome requirements into learning objectives, awareness, knowledge and skills. Consecutive steps will be those of harmonising and implementing teaching and assessment strategies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Report on computational assessment of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group
    (Nature Research, 2020-05-12) Amgad, Mohamed; Stovgaard, Elisabeth Specht; Balslev, Eva; Thagaard, Jeppe; Chen, Weijie; Dudgeon, Sarah; Sharma, Ashish; Kerner, Jennifer K.; Denkert, Carsten; Yuan, Yinyin; AbdulJabbar, Khalid; Wienert, Stephan; Savas, Peter; Voorwerk, Leonie; Beck, Andrew H.; Madabhushi, Anant; Hartman, Johan; Sebastian, Manu M.; Horlings, Hugo M.; Hudeček, Jan; Ciompi, Francesco; Moore, David A.; Singh, Rajendra; Roblin, Elvire; Balancin, Marcelo Luiz; Mathieu, Marie-Christine; Lennerz, Jochen K.; Kirtani, Pawan; Chen, I-Chun; Braybrooke, Jeremy P.; Pruneri, Giancarlo; Demaria, Sandra; Adams, Sylvia; Schnitt, Stuart J.; Lakhani, Sunil R.; Rojo, Federico; Comerma, Laura; Badve, Sunil S.; Khojasteh, Mehrnoush; Symmans, W. Fraser; Sotiriou, Christos; Gonzalez-Ericsson, Paula; Pogue-Geile, Katherine L.; Kim, Rim S.; Rimm, David L.; Viale, Giuseppe; Hewitt, Stephen M.; Bartlett, John M. S.; Penault-Llorca, Frédérique; Goel, Shom; Lien, Huang-Chun; Loibl, Sibylle; Kos, Zuzana; Loi, Sherene; Hanna, Matthew G.; Michiels, Stefan; Kok, Marleen; Nielsen, Torsten O.; Lazar, Alexander J.; Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna; Kooreman, Loes F. S.; Van der Laak, Jeroen A.W. M.; Saltz, Joel; Gallas, Brandon D.; Kurkure, Uday; Barnes, Michael; Salgado, Roberto; Cooper, Lee A. D.; International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is increasingly recognized as an integral part of the prognostic workflow in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer, as well as many other solid tumors. This recognition has come about thanks to standardized visual reporting guidelines, which helped to reduce inter-reader variability. Now, there are ripe opportunities to employ computational methods that extract spatio-morphologic predictive features, enabling computer-aided diagnostics. We detail the benefits of computational TILs assessment, the readiness of TILs scoring for computational assessment, and outline considerations for overcoming key barriers to clinical translation in this arena. Specifically, we discuss: 1. ensuring computational workflows closely capture visual guidelines and standards; 2. challenges and thoughts standards for assessment of algorithms including training, preanalytical, analytical, and clinical validation; 3. perspectives on how to realize the potential of machine learning models and to overcome the perceptual and practical limits of visual scoring.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The tale of TILs in breast cancer: A report from The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group
    (Springer Nature, 2021-12-01) El Bairi, Khalid; Haynes, Harry R.; Blackley, Elizabeth; Fineberg, Susan; Shear, Jeffrey; Turner, Sophia; de Freitas, Juliana Ribeiro; Sur, Daniel; Amendola, Luis Claudio; Gharib, Masoumeh; Kallala, Amine; Arun, Indu; Azmoudeh-Ardalan, Farid; Fujimoto, Luciana; Sua, Luz F.; Liu, Shi-Wei; Lien, Huang-Chun; Kirtani, Pawan; Balancin, Marcelo; El Attar, Hicham; Guleria, Prerna; Yang, Wenxian; Shash, Emad; Chen, I-Chun; Bautista, Veronica; Do Prado Moura, Jose Fernando; Rapoport, Bernardo L.; Castaneda, Carlos; Spengler, Eunice; Acosta-Haab, Gabriela; Frahm, Isabel; Sanchez, Joselyn; Castillo, Miluska; Bouchmaa, Najat; Md Zin, Reena R.; Shui, Ruohong; Onyuma, Timothy; Yang, Wentao; Husain, Zaheed; Willard-Gallo, Karen; Coosemans, An; Perez, Edith A.; Provenzano, Elena; Gonzalez Ericsson, Paula; Richardet, Eduardo; Mehrotra, Ravi; Sarancone, Sandra; Ehinger, Anna; Rimm, David L.; Bartlett, John M. S.; Viale, Giuseppe; Denkert, Carsten; Hida, Akira I.; Sotiriou, Christos; Loibl, Sibylle; Hewitt, Stephen M.; Badve, Sunil; Symmans, William Fraser; Kim, Rim S.; Pruneri, Giancarlo; Goel, Shom; Francis, Prudence A.; Inurrigarro, Gloria; Yamaguchi, Rin; Garcia-Rivello, Hernan; Horlings, Hugo; Afqir, Said; Salgado, Roberto; Adams, Sylvia; Kok, Marleen; Dieci, Maria Vittoria; Michiels, Stefan; Demaria, Sandra; Loi, Sherene; International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    The advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in modern oncology has significantly improved survival in several cancer settings. A subgroup of women with breast cancer (BC) has immunogenic infiltration of lymphocytes with expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). These patients may potentially benefit from ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 signaling axis. The use of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as predictive and prognostic biomarkers has been under intense examination. Emerging data suggest that TILs are associated with response to both cytotoxic treatments and immunotherapy, particularly for patients with triple-negative BC. In this review from The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group, we discuss (a) the biological understanding of TILs, (b) their analytical and clinical validity and efforts toward the clinical utility in BC, and (c) the current status of PD-L1 and TIL testing across different continents, including experiences from low-to-middle-income countries, incorporating also the view of a patient advocate. This information will help set the stage for future approaches to optimize the understanding and clinical utilization of TIL analysis in patients with BC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte stratification of prognostic staging of early-stage triple negative breast cancer
    (Springer, 2022-01-11) Loi, Sherene; Salgado, Roberto; Adams, Sylvia; Pruneri, Giancarlo; Francis, Prudence A.; Lacroix-Triki, Magali; Joensuu, Heikki; Dieci, Maria Vittoria; Badve, Sunil; Demaria, Sandra; Gray, Robert; Munzone, Elisabetta; Drubay, Damien; Lemonnier, Jerome; Sotiriou, Christos; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko Liisa; Vingiani, Andrea; Gray, Kathryn; André, Fabrice; Denkert, Carsten; Piccart, Martine; Roblin, Elvire; Michiels , Stefan; Surgery, School of Medicine
    The importance of integrating biomarkers into the TNM staging has been emphasized in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging system. In a pooled analysis of 2148 TNBC-patients in the adjuvant setting, TILs are found to strongly up and downstage traditional pathological-staging in the Pathological and Clinical Prognostic Stage Groups from the AJJC 8th edition Cancer Staging System. This suggest that clinical and research studies on TNBC should take TILs into account in addition to stage, as for example patients with stage II TNBC and high TILs have a better outcome than patients with stage I and low TILs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte stratification of prognostic staging of early-stage triple negative breast cancer
    (Springer Nature, 2022-01-11) Loi, Sherene; Salgado, Roberto; Adams, Sylvia; Pruneri, Giancarlo; Francis, Prudence A.; Lacroix-Triki, Magali; Joensuu, Heikki; Dieci, Maria Vittoria; Badve, Sunil; Demaria, Sandra; Gray, Robert; Munzone, Elisabetta; Drubay, Damien; Lemonnier, Jerome; Sotiriou, Christos; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko Liisa; Vingiani, Andrea; Gray, Kathryn; André, Fabrice; Denkert, Carsten; Piccart, Martine; Roblin, Elvire; Michiels, Stefan; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    The importance of integrating biomarkers into the TNM staging has been emphasized in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging system. In a pooled analysis of 2148 TNBC-patients in the adjuvant setting, TILs are found to strongly up and downstage traditional pathological-staging in the Pathological and Clinical Prognostic Stage Groups from the AJJC 8th edition Cancer Staging System. This suggest that clinical and research studies on TNBC should take TILs into account in addition to stage, as for example patients with stage II TNBC and high TILs have a better outcome than patients with stage I and low TILs.