- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Ruhl, Laura J."
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A Global Health Reciprocal Innovation grant programme: 5-year review with lessons learnt(BMJ Publishing, 2023) Ruhl, Laura J.; Kiplagat, Jepchirchir; O'Brien, Rishika; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Scanlon, Michael; Plater, David; Thomas, Melissa R.; Pastakia, Sonak; Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi; Morales-Soto, Nydia; Nyandiko, Winstone; Vreeman, Rachel C.; Litzelman, Debra K.; Laktabai, Jeremiah; Medicine, School of MedicineUnilateral approaches to global health innovations can be transformed into cocreative, uniquely collaborative relationships between low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HIC), constituted as 'reciprocal innovation' (RI). Since 2018, the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI) and Indiana University (IU) Center for Global Health Equity have led a grants programme sculpted from the core elements of RI, a concept informed by a 30-year partnership started between IU (Indiana) and Moi University (Kenya), which leverages knowledge sharing, transformational learning and translational innovations to address shared health challenges. In this paper, we describe the evolution and implementation of an RI grants programme, as well as the challenges faced. We aim to share the successes of our RI engagement and encourage further funding opportunities to promote innovations grounded in the RI core elements. From the complex series of challenges encountered, three major lessons have been learnt: dedicating extensive time and resources to bring different settings together; establishing local linkages across investigators; and addressing longstanding inequities in global health research. We describe our efforts to address these challenges through educational materials and an online library of resources for RI projects. Using perspectives from RI investigators funded by this programme, we offer future directions resulting from our 5-year experience in applying this RI-focused approach. As the understanding and implementation of RI grow, global health investigators can share resources, knowledge and innovations that have the potential to significantly change the face of collaborative international research and address long-standing health inequities across diverse settings.Item The Impact of Health Workers' Strikes on Health Outcomes and Health Service Utilization in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review(Social Science Research Network, 2019) Scanlon, Michael L.; Maldonado, Lauren Y.; Ruhl, Laura J.; Atwoli, Lukoye; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground The impact of strikes by health workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is not well described. We systematically reviewed articles on the impact of health workers’ strikes on health outcomes or health service utilization in LMIC. Methods We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases on May 27, 2019. To be included for review, articles met the following criteria: (1) reported on a strike that involved at least one cadre of health worker; (2) reported on a strike in a LMIC; (3) included at least one outcome related to patient or population health or health service utilization; and, (4) included a reference group or time period. There were no date or language restrictions. We modified the Newcastle-Ottawa Tool to appraise study quality. The review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019124989). Findings Among 5,123 articles, eleven articles met inclusion criteria. Studies examined 20 strikes in LMIC from 1991 to 2017 (average strike length of 32·9 days), with five studies from Kenya, two each from India and Nigeria, and one each from Malawi and South Africa. The majority of studies reported hospital admissions or inpatient mortality. Generally, health service utilization decreased during strike periods, but changes in patient mortality and other health outcomes varied. Study quality was heterogenous with most studies reporting from a single facility or medical department. Interpretation Compared to high-income settings, our study suggests a more complex picture of the effect of strikes by health workers on health and health service utilization outcomes in LMIC.Item Improving maternal, newborn and child health outcomes through a community-based women's health education program: a cluster randomised controlled trial in western Kenya(BMJ, 2020-12) Maldonado, Lauren Y.; Bone, Jeffrey; Scanlon, Michael L.; Anusu, Gertrude; Chelagat, Sheilah; Jumah, Anjellah; Ikemeri, Justus; Songok, Julia J.; Christoffersen-Deb, Astrid; Ruhl, Laura J.; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction: Community-based women's health education groups may improve maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH); however, evidence from sub-Saharan Africa is lacking. Chamas for Change (Chamas) is a community health volunteer (CHV)-led, group-based health education programme for pregnant and postpartum women in western Kenya. We evaluated Chamas' effect on facility-based deliveries and other MNCH outcomes. Methods: We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 74 community health units in Trans Nzoia County. We included pregnant women who presented to health facilities for their first antenatal care visits by 32 weeks gestation. We randomised clusters 1:1 without stratification or matching; we masked data collectors, investigators and analysts to allocation. Intervention clusters were invited to bimonthly, group-based, CHV-led health lessons (Chamas); control clusters had monthly, individual CHV home visits (standard of care). The primary outcome was facility-based delivery at 12-month follow-up. We conducted an intention-to-treat approach with multilevel logistic regression models using individual-level data. Results: Between 27 November 2017 and 8 March 2018, we enrolled 1920 participants from 37 intervention and 37 control clusters. A total of 1550 (80.7%) participants completed the study with 822 (82.5%) and 728 (78.8%) in the intervention and control arms, respectively. Facility-based deliveries improved in the intervention arm (80.9% vs 73.0%; risk difference (RD) 7.4%, 95% CI 3.0 to 12.5, OR=1.58, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.55, p=0.057). Chamas participants also demonstrated higher rates of 48 hours postpartum visits (RD 15.3%, 95% CI 12.0 to 19.6), exclusive breastfeeding (RD 11.9%, 95% CI 7.2 to 16.9), contraceptive adoption (RD 7.2%, 95% CI 2.6 to 12.9) and infant immunisation completion (RD 15.6%, 95% CI 11.5 to 20.9). Conclusion: Chamas participation was associated with significantly improved MNCH outcomes compared with the standard of care. This trial contributes robust data from sub-Saharan Africa to support community-based, women's health education groups for MNCH in resource-limited settings.Trial registration numberNCT03187873.Item ‘It was hell in the community’: a qualitative study of maternal and child health care during health care worker strikes in Kenya(BMC, 2021-09-23) Scanlon, Michael L.; Maldonado, Lauren Y.; Ikemeri, Justus E.; Jumah, Anjellah; Anusu, Getrude; Chelagat, Sheilah; Keter, Joann Chebet; Songok, Julia; Ruhl, Laura J.; Christoffersen‑Deb, Astrid; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Health care workers in Kenya have launched major strikes in the public health sector in the past decade but the impact of strikes on health systems is under-explored. We conducted a qualitative study to investigate maternal and child health care and services during nationwide strikes by health care workers in 2017 from the perspective of pregnant women, community health volunteers (CHVs), and health facility managers. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with three populations: women who were pregnant in 2017, CHVs, and health facility managers. Women who were pregnant in 2017 were part of a previous study. All participants were recruited using convenience sampling from a single County in western Kenya. Interviews and FGDs were conducted in English or Kiswahili using semi-structured guides that probed women's pregnancy experiences and maternal and child health services in 2017. Interviews and FGDs were audio-recorded, translated, and transcribed. Content analysis followed a thematic framework approach using deductive and inductive approaches. Results: Forty-three women and 22 CHVs participated in 4 FGDs and 3 FGDs, respectively, and 8 health facility managers participated in interviews. CHVs and health facility managers were majority female (80%). Participants reported that strikes by health care workers significantly impacted the availability and quality of maternal and child health services in 2017 and had indirect economic effects due to households paying for services in the private sector. Participants felt it was the poor, particularly poor women, who were most affected since they were more likely to rely on public services, while CHVs highlighted their own poor working conditions in response to strikes by physicians and nurses. Strikes strained relationships and trust between communities and the health system that were identified as essential to maternal and child health care. Conclusion: We found that the impacts of strikes by health care workers in 2017 extended beyond negative health and economic effects and exacerbated fundamental inequities in the health system. While this study was conducted in one County, our findings suggest several potential avenues for strengthening maternal and child health care in Kenya that were highlighted by nationwide strikes in 2017.Item Microfinance, retention in care, and mortality among patients enrolled in HIV 2 Care in East Africa(Wolters Kluwer, 2021-10) Genberg, Becky L.; Wilson-Barthes, Marta G.; Omodi, Victor; Hogan, Joseph W.; Steingrimsson, Jon; Wachira, Juddy; Pastakia, Sonak; Tran, Dan N.; Kiragu, Zana W.; Ruhl, Laura J.; Rosenberg, Molly; Kimaiyo, Sylvester; Galárraga, Omar; Medicine, School of MedicineObjective: To measure associations between participation in community-based microfinance groups, retention in HIV care, and death among people with HIV (PWH) in low-resource settings. Design and methods: We prospectively analyzed data from 3609 patients enrolled in an HIV care program in western Kenya. HIV patients who were eligible and chose to participate in a Group Integrated Savings for Health Empowerment (GISHE) microfinance group were matched 1 : 2 on age, sex, year of enrollment in HIV care, and location of initial HIV clinic visit to patients not participating in GISHE. Follow-up data were abstracted from medical records from January 2018 through February 2020. Logistic regression analysis examined associations between GISHE participation and two outcomes: retention in HIV care (i.e. >1 HIV care visit attended within 6 months prior to the end of follow-up) and death. Socioeconomic factors associated with HIV outcomes were included in adjusted models. Results: The study population was majority women (78.3%) with a median age of 37.4 years. Microfinance group participants were more likely to be retained in care relative to HIV patients not participating in a microfinance group [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.71; P = 0.046]. Participation in group microfinance was associated with a reduced odds of death during the follow-up period (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.28–1.09; P = 0.105). Conclusion: Participation in group-based microfinance appears to be associated with better HIV treatment outcomes. A randomized trial is needed to assess whether microfinance groups can improve clinical and socioeconomic outcomes among PWH in similar settings.Item Participation in a Community-Based Women's Health Education Program and At-Risk Child Development in Rural Kenya: Developmental Screening Questionnaire Results Analysis(Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Program, 2021-12-21) McHenry, Megan S.; Maldonado, Lauren Y.; Yang, Ziyi; Anusu, Gertrude; Kaluhi, Evelyn; Christoffersen-Deb, Astrid; Songok, Julia J.; Ruhl, Laura J.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground: Over 43% of children living in low- and middle-income countries are at risk for developmental delays; however, access to protective interventions in these settings is limited. We evaluated the effect of maternal participation in Chamas for Change (Chamas)-a community-based women's health education program during pregnancy and postpartum-and risk of developmental delay among their children in rural Kenya. Methods: We analyzed developmental screening questionnaire (DSQ) data from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Trans Nzoia County, Kenya (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03187873). Intervention clusters (Chamas) participated in community health volunteer-led, group-based health lessons twice a month during pregnancy and postpartum; controls had monthly home visits (standard of care). We screened all children born during the trial who were alive at 1-year follow-up. We labeled children with any positive item on the DSQ as "at-risk development." We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and multilevel regression models (α=.05); analyses were intention-to-treat using individual-level data. Results: Between November 2017 and March 2018, we enrolled 1,920 pregnant women to participate in the parent trial. At 1-year follow-up, we screened 1,273 (689 intervention, 584 control) children born during the trial with the DSQ. Intervention mothers had lower education levels and higher poverty likelihood scores than controls (P<.001 and P=.007, respectively). The overall rate of at-risk development was 3.5%. Children in Chamas clusters demonstrated significantly lower rates of at-risk development than controls (2.5% vs. 4.8%, P=.025). Adjusted analyses revealed lower odds for at-risk development in the intervention arm (OR=0.50; 95% confidence interval=0.27, 0.94). Conclusions: Maternal participation in a community-based women's health education program was associated with lower rates of at-risk development compared to the standard of care. Overall, rates of at-risk development were lower than expected for this population, warranting further investigation. Chamas may help protect children from developmental delay in rural Kenya and other resource-limited settings.Item Promoting positive maternal, newborn, and child health behaviors through a group-based health education and microfinance program: a prospective matched cohort study in western Kenya(BMC, 2020) Maldonado, Lauren Y.; Songok, Julia J.; Snelgrove, John W.; Ochieng, Christian B.; Chelagat, Sheilah; Ikemeri, Justus E.; Okwanyi, Monica A.; Cole, Donald C.; Ruhl, Laura J.; Christoffersen-Deb, Astrid; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground Chamas for Change (Chamas) is a group-based health education and microfinance program for pregnant and postpartum women that aims to address inequities contributing to high rates of maternal and infant mortality in rural western Kenya. In this prospective matched cohort study, we evaluated the association between Chamas participation and facility-based delivery. We additionally explored the effect of participation on promoting other positive maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) behaviors. Methods We prospectively compared outcomes between a cohort of Chamas participants and controls matched for age, parity, and prenatal care location. Between October–December 2012, government-sponsored community health volunteers (CHV) recruited pregnant women attending their first antenatal care (ANC) visits at rural health facilities in Busia County to participate in Chamas. Women enrolled in Chamas agreed to attend group-based health education and microfinance sessions for one year; controls received the standard of care. We used descriptive analyses, multivariable logistic regression models, and random effect models to compare outcomes across cohorts 12 months following enrollment, with α set to 0.05. Results Compared to controls (n = 115), a significantly higher proportion of Chamas participants (n = 211) delivered in a health facility (84.4% vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001), attended at least four ANC visits (64.0% vs. 37.4%, p < 0·001), exclusively breastfed to six months (82.0% vs. 47.0%, p < 0·001), and received a CHV home visit within 48 h postpartum (75.8% vs. 38.3%, p < 0·001). In multivariable models, Chamas participants were over five times as likely as controls to deliver in a health facility (OR 5.49, 95% CI 3.12–9.64, p < 0.001). Though not significant, Chamas participants experienced a lower proportion of stillbirths (0.9% vs. 5.2%), miscarriages (5.2% vs. 7.8%), infant deaths (2.8% vs. 3.4%), and maternal deaths (0.9% vs. 1.7%) compared to controls. Conclusions Chamas participation was associated with increased odds of facility-based delivery compared to the standard of care in rural western Kenya. Larger proportions of program participants also practiced other positive MNCH behaviors. Our findings demonstrate Chamas’ potential to achieve population-level MNCH benefits; however, a larger study is needed to validate this observed effect.