- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Rowe, Jacob M."
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item CNS involvement in AML at diagnosis is rare and does not affect response or survival: data from 11 ECOG-ACRIN trials(American Society of Hematology, 2021) Ganzel, Chezi; Lee, Ju-Whei; Fernandez, Hugo F.; Paietta, Elisabeth M.; Luger, Selina M.; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Cripe, Larry D.; Douer, Dan; Wiernik, Peter H.; Rowe, Jacob M.; Tallman, Martin S.; Litzow, Mark R.; Medicine, School of MedicineCentral nervous system (CNS) involvement in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is rare, and systematic data regarding outcome are scarce. This retrospective study summarized data from 11 consecutive Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed AML. In all, 3240 patients with AML were analyzed, and 36 (1.11%) were found to have CNS involvement at diagnosis. The incidence of CNS disease among the 5 studies with per protocol mandatory lumbar puncture (LP) was similar to the incidence among studies in which LP was performed at the discretion of the investigator (0.86% vs 1.41%; P = .18). There was no significant difference in the rate of complete remission (CR) among patients with CNS involvement and those with other extramedullary disease (EMD) sites or those with no EMD (52.8% vs 59.3%-60%). The median overall survival (OS) for patients who were CNS positive, who had other EMD, or who had no EMD was 11.4, 11.3, and 12.7 months, respectively. There was no difference in OS among patients with CNS involvement, those with other EMD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; adjusted P = .84), and those with no EMD (HR, 1.19; adjusted P = .44). In conclusion, the reported incidence of CNS involvement in patients with newly diagnosed AML is low (1.1%), irrespective of whether an LP is mandatory or not. The presence of CNS disease at diagnosis in and of itself does not seem to portend a poor prognosis for achieving an initial CR or for OS.Item In Support of a Patient-Driven Initiative and Petition to Lower the High Price of Cancer Drugs(Elsevier, 2015-08) Tefferi, Ayalew; Kantarjian, Hagop; Rajkumar, S. Vincent; Baker, Lawrence H.; Abkowitz, Jan L.; Adamson, John W.; Advani, Ranjana Hira; Allison, James; Antman, Karen H.; Bast Jr., Robert C.; Bennett, John M.; Benz Jr., Edward J.; Berliner, Nancy; Bertino, Joseph; Bhatia, Ravi; Bhatia, Smita; Bhojwani, Deepa; Blanke, Charles D.; Bloomfield, Clara D.; Bosserman, Linda; Broxmeyer, Hal E.; Byrd, John C.; Cabanillas, Fernando; Canellos, George Peter; Chabner, Bruce A.; Chanan-Khan, Asher; Cheson, Bruce; Clarkson, Bayard; Cohn, Susan L.; Colon-Otero, Gerardo; Cortese, Jorge; Coutre, Steven; Cristofanilli, Massimo; Curran Jr., Walter J.; Daley, George Q.; DeAngelo, Daniel J.; Deeg, H. Joachim; Einhorn, Lawrence H.; Erba, Harry P.; Esteva, Francisco J.; Estey, Elihu; Fidler, Isaiah J.; Foran, James; Forman, Stephen; Freireich, Emil; Fuchs, Charles; George, James N.; Gertz, Morie A.; Giralt, Sergio; Golomb, Harvey; Greenberg, Peter; Gutterman, Jordan; Handin, Robert I.; Hellman, Samuel; Hoff, Paulo Marcelo; Hoffman, Ronald; Hong, Waun Ki; Horowitz, Mary; Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.; Hudis, Clifford; Issa, Jean Pierre; Johnson, Bruce Evan; Kantoff, Philip W.; Kaushansky, Kenneth; Khayat, David; Khuri, Fadlo R.; Kipps, Thomas J.; Kripke, Margaret; Kyle, Robert A.; Larson, Richard A.; Lawrence, Theodore S.; Levine, Ross; Link, Michael P.; Lippman, Scott M.; Lonial, Sagar; Lyman, Gary H.; Markman, Maurie; Mendelsohn, John; Meropol, Neal J.; Messinger, Yoav; Mulvey, Therese M.; O’Brien, Susan; Perez-Soler, Roman; Pollock, Raphael; Prchal, Josef; Press, Oliver; Radich, Jerald; Rai, Kanti; Rosenberg, Saul A.; Rowe, Jacob M.; Rugo, Hope; Runowicz, Carolyn D.; Sandmaier, Brenda M.; Saven, Alan; Schafer, Andrew I.; Schiffer, Charles; Sekeres, Mikkael A.; Silver, Richard T.; Siu, Lillian L.; Steensma, David P.; Stewart, F. Marc; Stock, Wendy; Stone, Richard; Storb, Rainer; Strong, Louise C.; Tallman, Martin S.; Thompson, Michael; Ueno, Naoto T.; Van Etten, Richard A.; Vose, Julie M.; Wiernik, Peter H.; Winer, Eric P.; Younes, Anas; Zelenetz, Andrew D.; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineComment in Lowering the High Cost of Cancer Drugs--III. [Mayo Clin Proc. 2016] Lowering the High Cost of Cancer Drugs--I. [Mayo Clin Proc. 2016] Lowering the High Cost of Cancer Drugs--IV. [Mayo Clin Proc. 2016] In Reply--Lowering the High Cost of Cancer Drugs. [Mayo Clin Proc. 2016] US oncologists call for government regulation to curb drug price rises. [BMJ. 2015]Item Independent Prognostic Significance of Monosomy 17 and Impact of Karyotype Complexity in Monosomal Karyotype/Complex Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from Four ECOG-ACRIN Prospective Therapeutic Trials(Elsevier, 2017-08) Strickland, Stephen A.; Sun, Zhuoxin; Ketterling, Rhett P.; Cherry, Athena M.; Cripe, Larry D.; Dewald, Gordon; Fernandez, Hugo; Hicks, Gary A.; Higgins, Rodney R.; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Litzow, Mark R.; Luger, Selina M.; Paietta, Elisabeth M.; Rowe, Jacob M.; Vance, Gail H.; Wiernik, Peter; Wiktor, Anne E.; Zhang, Yanming; Tallman, Martin S.; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineThe presence of a monosomal karyotype (MK+) and/or a complex karyotype (CK+) identifies subcategories of AML with poor prognosis. The prognostic significance of the most common monosomies (monosomy 5, monosomy 7, and monosomy 17) within MK+/CK+ AML is not well defined. We analyzed data from 1,592 AML patients age 17–93 years enrolled on ECOG-ACRIN therapeutic trials. The majority of MK+ patients (182/195; 93%) were MK+/CK+ with 87% (158/182) having ≥5 clonal abnormalities (CK≥ 5). MK+ patients with karyotype complexity ≤4 had a median overall survival (OS) of 0.4y compared to 1.0y for MK- with complexity ≤4 (p < 0.001), whereas no OS difference was seen in MK+ vs. MK- patients with CK≥ 5 (p = 0.82). Monosomy 5 (93%; 50/54) typically occurred within a highly complex karyotype and had no impact on OS (0.4y; p = 0.95). Monosomy 7 demonstrated no impact on OS in patients with CK≥ 5 (p = 0.39) or CK ≤ 4 (p = 0.44). Monosomy 17 appeared in 43% (68/158) of CK≥ 5 patients and demonstrated statistically significant worse OS (0.4y) compared to CK≥ 5 patients without monosomy 17 (0.5y; p = 0.012). Our data suggest that the prognostic impact of MK+ is limited to those with less complex karyotypes and that monosomy 17 may independently predict for worse survival in patients with AML.Item Prognostic effect of gender on outcome of treatment for adults with acute myeloid leukaemia(Wiley, 2021) Wiernik, Peter H.; Sun, Zhuoxin; Cripe, Larry D.; Rowe, Jacob M.; Fernandez, Hugo F.; Luger, Selina M.; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Paietta, Elisabeth M.; Tallman, Martin S.; Litzow, Mark R.; Medicine, School of MedicineThere are conflicting reports in the literature suggesting that one gender or the other has a better survival with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This study was done in an attempt to resolve the issue. The effect of gender was examined on 3,546 newly diagnosed patients with AML, including 548 patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) enrolled in 10 multi-institutional treatment studies from March 1984 to November 2008. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate event-time distributions for survival and multivariate models were used to examine the gender effect after adjusting for multiple risk factors. P values were based on 2-sided tests. Non-APL female patients had a significantly better overall but not disease-free survival than males, irrespective of age, initial WBC count, or dose of daunorubicin. No differences were observed for obese or FLT3-ITD + patients. Female APL patients had a significantly better overall and disease-free survival than male APL patients, and differences in survival were greater for patients with t(15;17) + other cytogenetic abnormalities compared with those with t(15;17) only. Gender is an independent prognostic variable in patients with AML. Whether these survival differences are due to hormonal, genetic or pharmacokinetic differences between the sexes, or differential toxin exposure such as smoking is unknown. However, the former seems less likely since patient age did not influence the survival advantage for female patients.Item Survival following allogeneic transplant in patients with myelofibrosis(American Society of Hematology, 2020-05-08) Gowin, Krisstina; Ballen, Karen; Ahn, Kwang Woo; Hu, Zhen-Huan; Ali, Haris; Arcasoy, Murat O.; Devlin, Rebecca; Coakley, Maria; Gerds, Aaron T.; Green, Michael; Gupta, Vikas; Hobbs, Gabriela; Jain, Tania; Kandarpa, Malathi; Komrokji, Rami; Kuykendall, Andrew T.; Luber, Kierstin; Masarova, Lucia; Michaelis, Laura C.; Patches, Sarah; Pariser, Ashley C.; Rampal, Raajit; Stein, Brady; Talpaz, Moshe; Verstovsek, Srdan; Wadleigh, Martha; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Diaz, Miguel Angel; Avalos, Belinda R.; Bacher, Ulrike; Bashey, Asad; Beitinjaneh, Amer M.; Cerny, Jan; Chhabra, Saurabh; Copelan, Edward; Cutler, Corey S.; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Gadalla, Shahinaz M.; Ganguly, Siddhartha; Grunwald, Michael R.; Hashmi, Shahrukh K.; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.; Kindwall-Keller, Tamila; Kröger, Nicolaus; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Liesveld, Jane L.; Litzow, Mark R.; Marks, David I.; Nathan, Sunita; Nishihori, Taiga; Olsson, Richard F.; Pawarod, Attaphol; Rowe, Jacob M.; Savani, Bipin N.; Savoie, Mary Lynn; Seo, Sachiko; Solh, Melhem; Tamari, Roni; Verdonck, Leo F.; Yared, Jean A.; Alyea, Edwin; Popat, Uday; Sobecks, Ronald; Scott, Bart L.; Nakamura, Ryotaro; Mesa, Ruben; Saber, Wael; Medicine, School of MedicineAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.