Browsing by Author "Roep, Bart O."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Introducing the Endotype Concept to Address the Challenge of Disease Heterogeneity in Type 1 Diabetes
    (American Diabetes Association, 2020-01) Battaglia, Manuela; Ahmed, Simi; Anderson, Mark S.; Atkinson, Mark A.; Becker, Dorothy; Bingley, Polly J.; Bosi, Emanuele; Brusko, Todd M.; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Evans-Molina, Carmella; Gitelman, Stephen E.; Greenbaum, Carla J.; Gottlieb, Peter A.; Herold, Kevan C.; Hessner, Martin J.; Knip, Mikael; Jacobsen, Laura; Krischer, Jeffrey P.; Long, S. Alice; Lundgren, Markus; McKinney, Eoin F.; Morgan, Noel G.; Oram, Richard A.; Pastinen, Tomi; Peters, Michael C.; Petrelli, Alessandra; Qian, Xiaoning; Redondo, Maria J.; Roep, Bart O.; Schatz, Desmond; Skibinski, David; Peakman, Mark; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    The clinical diagnosis of new-onset type 1 diabetes has, for many years, been considered relatively straightforward. Recently, however, there is increasing awareness that within this single clinical phenotype exists considerable heterogeneity: disease onset spans the complete age range; genetic susceptibility is complex; rates of progression differ markedly, as does insulin secretory capacity; and complication rates, glycemic control, and therapeutic intervention efficacy vary widely. Mechanistic and immunopathological studies typically show considerable patchiness across subjects, undermining conclusions regarding disease pathways. Without better understanding, type 1 diabetes heterogeneity represents a major barrier both to deciphering pathogenesis and to the translational effort of designing, conducting, and interpreting clinical trials of disease-modifying agents. This realization comes during a period of unprecedented change in clinical medicine, with increasing emphasis on greater individualization and precision. For complex disorders such as type 1 diabetes, the option of maintaining the "single disease" approach appears untenable, as does the notion of individualizing each single patient's care, obliging us to conceptualize type 1 diabetes less in terms of phenotypes (observable characteristics) and more in terms of disease endotypes (underlying biological mechanisms). Here, we provide our view on an approach to dissect heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes. Using lessons from other diseases and the data gathered to date, we aim to delineate a roadmap through which the field can incorporate the endotype concept into laboratory and clinical practice. We predict that such an effort will accelerate the implementation of precision medicine and has the potential for impact on our approach to translational research, trial design, and clinical management.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Contributes to Phenotypic Presentation in Monogenic Autoimmune Diabetes
    (American Diabetes Association, 2025) Luckett, Amber M.; Hawkes, Gareth; Green, Harry D.; De Franco, Elisa; Hagopian, William A.; Roep, Bart O.; Weedon, Michael N.; Oram, Richard A.; Johnson, Matthew B.; EXE-T1D consortium; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    There is variability in early-onset autoimmune diabetes presentation in individuals with monogenic autoimmunity; the mechanism(s) underlying this is unclear. We examined whether type 1 diabetes (T1D) polygenic risk contributes to clinical phenotype in monogenic autoimmune diabetes. Individuals with monogenic autoimmune diabetes had higher T1D genetic risk scores compared with control cohorts, driven largely by increased presence of T1D-risk DR3-DQ2 haplotype. Established T1D polygenic risk alleles, particularly class II HLA genes, contribute to clinical presentation in monogenic autoimmunity.