Browsing by Author "Robertson, Ashley S."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Faculty salaries in health administration: trends and correlates 2015-2021
    (2022-06) Balio, Casey P.; Taylor, Heather L.; Robertson, Ashley S.; Menachemi, Nir
    In this study, we provide updated information on salaries of academic health administration (HA) faculty members based on data collected in 2015, 2018, and 2021 and examine characteristics associated with earnings. We present mean inflation-adjusted salaries by demographic characteristics, education, experience, productivity, and job activities. We find that salaries of assistant, associate, and full professors have kept up with inflation and there have not been significant changes in salary by any characteristics over time. As in previous iterations of similar survey data, there remain differences in salary by both gender and race. Higher salaries were associated with having a 12-month contract, being tenured or tenure-track, having an administrative position, and being in a department whose focus is not primarily teaching. Findings from our study will be of interest to individuals on the HA job market, hiring committees, and doctoral students preparing for a position after graduation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    How Has the Pandemic Affected Career Satisfaction and Employment Perceptions of Faculty in Health Administration?
    (2023) Robertson, Ashley S.; Balio, Casey P.; Taylor, Heather L.; Menachemi, Nir
    Employee satisfaction has been shown to affect productivity and turnover among faculty in higher education. The COVID-19 pandemic has required significant organizational changes in higher education, including hiring freezes, furloughs, and a rapid move to online teaching. Little is known about the effects of these changes on health administration faculty. Therefore, the current study utilizes data from a national survey of health administration faculty conducted in 2018 and 2021 to perform three analyses: quantification of the proportion of faculty respondents experiencing furloughs or whose depart ments implemented a hiring freeze brought upon by the pandemic; changes in career satisfaction and employment perceptions between the years 2018 and 2021; and a cross-sectional analysis of the relationship between furloughs and/ or hiring freezes and 2021 career satisfaction and employment perceptions. Overall, 17.9% experienced a furlough and 81.4% indicated their department had a hiring freeze. We observed no significant changes in career satisfaction or employment perceptions from 2018 to 2021. However, receipt of furloughs was negatively associated with multiple indicators of career satisfaction and employment perceptions. The results of this study will be of interest to health administration program administrators and faculty as well as leaders in higher education who would benefit from understanding the impact of the pandemic on faculty more broadly.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Work-life balance among health administration faculty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
    (2022) Taylor, Heather L.; Balio, Casey P.; Robertson, Ashley S.; Menachemi, Nir
    This current study examines measures of work-life balance among health administration faculty prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A repeated cross-sectional design is used to analyze data collected from a national survey in 2018 and 2021. Changes in six different outcome measures of work-life balance were examined using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for health administration faculty characteristics. Compared to 2018 respondents, faculty respondents in 2021 were more likely to report that family and personal matters were interfering with their ability to do their job (OR = 1.93, p=0.001). Females more frequently reported that their career had suffered because of personal issues/obligations (OR = 1.82, p=0.003) but were less likely to report having enough time to get their teaching (OR = 0.68, p=0.026). Respondents with children 18 years or younger reported higher rates of regularly having to miss a meeting or event at home (OR = 1.88, p<0.001) and an event at work (OR = 3.74, p<0.001). These faculty also more frequently reported that family or personal matters were interfering with their ability to do their job (OR = 3.04, p<0.001) and that their career suffered because of personal issues/obligations (OR = 2.09, p=0.001). Given the implications of work-life conflicts to organizational outcomes, academic leaders and university decision-makers should consider adopting strategies to mitigate the effects of these disruptions to the work-life equilibrium of academics.