Browsing by Author "Risam, Roopika"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Disrupting Hierarchies of Evaluation: The Case of Reviews in Digital Humanities(Knowledge Futures, 2022-11-15) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jen; History, School of Liberal ArtsThis essay discusses how the editors of the journal Reviews in Digital Humanities have developed a people-first approach to peer review: community-centered peer review policies, workflows, and practices intended to address the gap in evaluation of digital scholarship. This work offers a model for disrupting hierarchies of evaluation that position senior, tenured professors as the appropriate gatekeepers of “quality” for digital scholarship and instead reframes the notion of “scholarly community” to recognize that expertise lies beyond the professoriate — particularly when evaluating public-facing scholarship. The essay further offers an example of how to create a community-driven peer review culture that brings in graduate students, librarians, archivists, public humanities workers, curators, and more to assess scholarship. In doing so, it articulates a vision for disrupting conventional notions of “expertise” and, in turn, hierarchies of evaluation for scholarship within the academy. What does it mean to develop and implement a people-first peer review system? This question lies at the heart of our work founding and running Reviews in Digital Humanities, an open-access journal published on PubPub that is dedicated to peer reviewing digital scholarly outputs (e.g., digital archives, exhibits, data sets, games) based on humanities research. Reviews responds to a gap in evaluation at the intersection of technology and the humanities, offering researchers who produce scholarship in genres other than traditional monographs, journal articles, and book chapters the opportunity to seek the imprimatur of peer review and external vetting of their work. From our commitment to creating a humane system of peer review that supports scholars as people, to the design of our peer review workflow, to the selection of reviewers who participants, Reviews disrupts hierarchies of evaluation in the academy and aims to consistently remind our scholarly community that we are all people first. The journal emerged from conversations between us, based on our experiences running peer review mechanisms for digital humanities conferences together. Through this work, we recognized a lack of consensus over how to peer review digital scholarly outputs. Despite the fact that colleagues in digital humanities create digital scholarship, there appeared to be no shared sense of how to evaluate digital scholarship created by others. Although professional organizations like the Modern Language Association (MLA) and American Historical Association (AHA) have invested time in developing guidelines, these have yet to be operationalized in evaluation. In addition to the challenges of conference abstract reviewing, there has also been a lack of outlets for peer review of digital scholarly projects themselves. We further observed that those most negatively affected by this lack of consensus were scholars in areas such as African diaspora studies, Latinx studies, Native and Indigenous studies, Asian American studies, and other areas that have been systematically marginalized in the academy. As many in these fields are also often scholars of color and/or Indigenous scholars, the peer review problems for digital scholarship compound harm in multiple ways: scholars in these areas already have a burden of demonstrating the legitimacy of their research, which is further compounded by the lack of an evaluation structure for the digital scholarship they create. This, in turn, has impacts on how their work is (or isn’t) valued in hiring, reappointment, tenure, and promotion. Recognizing that the many facets of these scholars’ identities as people has a direct impact on their professional lives, we identified the lack of peer review as a clear deterrent to building up digital scholarship in these underrepresented fields in digital humanities.Item Editors' Note: April 2022(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2022-04-19) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; Brown, Aleia; Parham, Marisa; Muñoz, Trevor; History, School of Liberal ArtsWelcome to the April 2022 issue of Reviews in Digital Humanities, which is the first of our two-part special issue on Black DH. Given our commitment to making Reviews as space that supports the formation of review communities for areas of scholarship that have not been as recognized in digital humanities communities as they should be, we are delighted to share this special issue, guest edited by Aleia Brown, Marisa Parham, and Trevor Muñoz.Item Editors' Note: August 2021(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2021-08-16) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal ArtsWelcome to the August 2021 issue of Reviews in Digital Humanities! This month, we are delighted to share the first installment of our special issue on sound, edited by Mary Caton Lingold. “Sound” is the first special issue of the journal to focus on a method and explores a broad range of interventions at the intersections of sound studies and digital humanities. Over the next three months, the special issue will explore experimental scholarship that blends sensory modalities, sonic histories, and the use of computational tools with large audio collections. Featuring sound demonstrates the journal’s commitment to creating spaces to showcase thriving areas of scholarship that do not always register within digital humanities broadly.Item Editors' Note: December 2022(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2022-12-19) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal ArtsWelcome to the December issue of Reviews in Digital Humanities. As we wrap up our third year of Reviews, we want to thank you for your enthusiasm, participation, and support for the journal. We wouldn’t be able to run the journal without such a generous community, so we’re incredibly grateful to you. We hope you have a restful holiday and wish you a happy and healthy new year.Item Editors' Note: June 2023(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2023-06-26) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal ArtsOur frenetic summer at Reviews in Digital Humanities is in full swing. Last week, we held the first training for our summer cohort of topic editors. We introduced them to the steps of defining a vision for their first topic issues, and to the processes we use to manage communications here at Reviews (hint: we love spreadsheets).Item Editors’ Note: July 2023(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2023-07-31) Guiliano, Jennifer; Risam, Roopika; Josephs, Kelly Baker; History, School of Liberal ArtsWelcome to the July 2023 issue of Reviews in Digital Humanities. This month, we are pleased to bring you a new special issue, “The Digital Black Atlantic,” edited by Roopika and guest editor Kelly Baker Josephs. This issue sheds light on a range of exciting projects in African diaspora studies.Item The Future of Land-Grab Universities(University of Minnesota Press, 2021) McCoy, Meredith; Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal ArtsItem Introduction: Reviews in Digital Humanities(2019) Guiliano, Jennifer; Risam, Roopika; History, School of Liberal Arts