Browsing by Author "Rapaport, Robert"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Differences in COVID-19 Outcomes Among Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: First vs Later Surges
    (MDedge, 2022-01) Gallagher, Mary Pat; Rompicherla, Saketh; Ebekozien, Osagie; Wilkes, Meredith; Antal, Zoltan; Feuer, Alexis Jamie; Rioles, Nicole; Noor, Nudrat; Gabriel, Liana; O’Malley, Grenye; Golden, Lauren; Alonso, G. Todd; Ospelt, Emma; Odugbesan, Ori; Lyons, Sarah K.; Mungmode, Ann; Prahalad, Priya; Clements, Mark; Neyman, Anna; Demeterco-Berggren, Carla; Rapaport, Robert; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background Outcomes of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) have improved throughout the pandemic. However, whether outcomes of COVID-19 in the type 1 diabetes (T1D) population improved over time is unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate differences in COVID-19 outcomes for patients with T1D in the US. Method We analyzed data collected via a registry of patients with T1D and COVID-19 from 56 sites between April 2020 and January 2021. First, we grouped cases into First Surge (04/09/2020 - 07/31/2020, n=188) and Late Surge (08/01/2020 - 01/31/2021, n=410). Then, we compared outcomes between both groups using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. Results Adverse outcomes were more frequent during the first surge including Diabetic Ketoacidosis (32% versus 15%, p<0.001), severe hypoglycemia (4% versus 1%, p=0.04) and hospitalization (52% versus 22%, p<0.001). The First surge cases were older (28 +/- 18.8 years versus 18.8 +/- 11.1 years, p<0.001), had higher hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (Median (IQR): 9.3 (4.0) versus 8.4(2.8), <0.001) and use public insurance (n(%): 107 (57) versus 154 (38), p <0.001). There were five times increased odds of hospitalization for adults (OR 5.01 (2.11,12.63) in the first surge compared to the late surge. Conclusion COVID-19 cases among patients with T1D reported during the first surge had a higher proportion of adverse outcomes than those presented in a later surge.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Updated Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Phelan-McDermid Syndrome
    (Wiley, 2023) Srivastava, Siddharth; Sahin, Mustafa; Buxbaum, Joseph D.; Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth; Valluripalli Soorya, Latha; Thurm, Audrey; Bernstein, Jonathan A.; Asante-Otoo, Afua; Bennett, William E., Jr.; Betancur, Catalina; Brickhouse, Tegwyn H.; Bueno, Maria Rita Passos; Chopra, Maya; Christensen, Celanie K.; Cully, Jennifer L.; Dies, Kira; Friedman, Kate; Gummere, Brittany; Holder, J. Lloyd, Jr.; Jimenez-Gomez, Andres; Kerins, Carolyn A.; Khan, Omar; Kohlenberg, Teresa; Lacro, Ronald V.; Levi, Lori A.; Levy, Tess; Linnehan, Diane; Loth, Eva; Moshiree, Baharak; Neumeyer, Ann; Paul, Scott M.; Phelan, Katy; Persico, Antonio; Rapaport, Robert; Rogers, Curtis; Saland, Jeffrey; Sethuram, Swathi; Shapiro, Janine; Tarr, Phillip I.; White, Kerry M.; Wickstrom, Jordan; Williams, Kent M.; Winrow, Dana; Wishart, Brian; Kolevzon, Alexander; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS) is a genetic condition caused by SHANK3 haploinsufficiency and characterized by a wide range of neurodevelopmental and systemic manifestations. The first practice parameters for assessment and monitoring in individuals with PMS were published in 2014; recently, knowledge about PMS has grown significantly based on data from longitudinal phenotyping studies and large-scale genotype-phenotype investigations. The objective of these updated clinical management guidelines was to: (1) reflect the latest in knowledge in PMS and (2) provide guidance for clinicians, researchers, and the general community. A taskforce was established with clinical experts in PMS and representatives from the parent community. Experts joined subgroups based on their areas of specialty, including genetics, neurology, neurodevelopment, gastroenterology, primary care, physiatry, nephrology, endocrinology, cardiology, gynecology, and dentistry. Taskforce members convened regularly between 2021 and 2022 and produced specialty-specific guidelines based on iterative feedback and discussion. Taskforce leaders then established consensus within their respective specialty group and harmonized the guidelines. The knowledge gained over the past decade allows for improved guidelines to assess and monitor individuals with PMS. Since there is limited evidence specific to PMS, intervention mostly follows general guidelines for treating individuals with developmental disorders. Significant evidence has been amassed to guide the management of comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions in PMS, albeit mainly from caregiver report and the experience of clinical experts. These updated consensus guidelines on the management of PMS represent an advance for the field and will improve care in the community. Several areas for future research are also highlighted and will contribute to subsequent updates with more refined and specific recommendations as new knowledge accumulates.