- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Rafii, Michael S."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Comparison of amyloid accumulation between Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer disease(Wiley, 2022) Boerwinkle, Anna H.; Gordon, Brian A.; Wisch, Julie K.; Flores, Shaney; Henson, Rachel L.; Butt, Omar Hameed; Chen, Charles D.; Benzinger, Tammie L. S.; Fagan, Anne M.; Handen, Benjamin L.; Christian, Bradley T.; Head, Elizabeth; Mapstone, Mark; Klunk, William E.; Rafii, Michael S.; O’Bryant, Sid E.; Price, Julie C.; Schupf, Nicole; Laymon, Charles M.; Krinsky-McHale, Sharon J.; Lai, Florence; Rosas, H. Diana; Hartley, Sigan L.; Zaman, Shahid; Lott, Ira T.; Silverman, Wayne; Brickman, Adam M.; Lee, Joseph H.; Allegri, Ricardo Francisco; Berman, Sarah; Chhatwal, Jasmeer P.; Chui, Helena C.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Farlow, Martin R.; Fox, Nick C.; Goate, Alison; Day, Gregory S.; Graff-Radford, Neill R.; Jucker, Mathias; Lee, Jae-Hong; Levin, Johannes; Martins, Ralph N.; Mori, Hiroshi; Perrin, Richard J.; Salloway, Stephen P.; Sanchez-Valle, Raquel; Schofield, Peter R.; Xiong, Chengjie; Karch, Celeste M.; Hassenstab, Jason J.; McDade, Eric; Bateman, Randall J.; Ances, Beau M.; Neurology, School of MedicineBackground: Given the triplication of chromosome 21 and the location of the amyloid precursor protein gene on chromosome 21, almost all adults with Down syndrome (DS) develop Alzheimer disease (AD)-like pathology and dementia during their lifetime. Comparing amyloid accumulation in DS to autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), another genetic form of AD, may improve our understanding of early AD pathology development. Method: We assessed amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in 192 participants with DS and 33 sibling controls from the Alzheimer’s Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome (ABC-DS) and 265 mutation-carriers (MC) and 169 familial controls from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) (Table 1). We calculated regional standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) using a cerebellar cortex reference region and converted global amyloid burden SUVR to centiloids. We compared amyloid PET by cognitive status and estimated-years-to-symptom-onset (EYO). EYO was calculated for DIAN participants by subtracting their age from parental age of symptom onset and for ABC-DS participants by subtracting their age from 50.2 years, a published average age of symptom onset in a large sample of individuals with DS (Fortea et al., 2020). In a subset of participants, we assessed the relationship between amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/40. Result: The relationship between CSF Aβ42/40 and amyloid PET was similar in DS and MC participants (Figure 1). We did not observe significant differences between MC and DS grouped by cognitive status (Figure 2). However, when assessed over EYO, global amyloid burden was significantly elevated in MC at EYO ≥ -23 but was not elevated in DS until EYO ≥ -15 (Figure 3). We observed early cortical and subcortical amyloid PET increases in both groups, but we also measured some regional differences in amyloid PET changes between MC and DS, specifically in the medial occipital region (Figure 4 and 5). Conclusion: These results demonstrate similarities in the relationship between amyloid biomarkers and the levels of amyloid accumulation in ADAD and DS. However, we also observed a 5-10 year delay and some regional differences in amyloid accumulation in DS. This is important for future clinical trials to consider when recruiting participants and determining treatment efficacy.Item Findings of Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Outcomes of Atabecestat in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Truncated Randomized Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial(American Medical Association, 2021) Sperling, Reisa; Henley, David; Aisen, Paul S.; Raman, Rema; Donohue, Michael C.; Ernstrom, Karin; Rafii, Michael S.; Streffer, Johannes; Shi, Yingqi; Karcher, Keith; Raghavan, Nandini; Tymofyeyev, Yevgen; Bogert, Jennifer; Brashear, H. Robert; Novak, Gerald; Thipphawong, John; Saad, Ziad S.; Kolb, Hartmuth; Rofael, Hany; Sanga, Panna; Romano, Gary; Psychiatry, School of MedicineImportance: Atabecestat, a nonselective oral β-secretase inhibitor, was evaluated in the EARLY trial for slowing cognitive decline in participants with preclinical Alzheimer disease. Preliminary analyses suggested dose-related cognitive worsening and neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs). Objective: To report efficacy, safety, and biomarker findings in the EARLY trial, both on and off atabecestat treatment, with focus on potential recovery of effects on cognition and behavior. Design, setting, and participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 study conducted from November 2015 to December 2018 after being stopped prematurely. The study was conducted at 143 centers across 14 countries. Participants were permitted to be followed off-treatment by the original protocol, collecting safety and efficacy data. From 4464 screened participants, 557 amyloid-positive, cognitively normal (Clinical Dementia Rating of 0; aged 60-85 years) participants (approximately 34% of originally planned 1650) were randomized before the trial sponsor stopped enrollment. Interventions: Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to atabecestat, 5 mg (n = 189), 25 mg (n = 183), or placebo (n = 185). Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome: change from baseline in Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite score. Secondary outcomes: change from baseline in the Cognitive Function Index and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status total scale score. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Results: Of 557 participants, 341 were women (61.2%); mean (SD) age was 70.4 (5.56) years. In May 2018, study medication was stopped early owing to hepatic-related AEs; participants were followed up off-treatment for 6 months. Atabecestat, 25 mg, showed significant cognitive worsening vs placebo for Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite at month 6 (least-square mean difference, -1.09; 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.53; P < .001) and month 12 (least-square mean, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.76; P < .001), and at month 3 for Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (least-square mean, -3.70; 95% CI, -5.76 to -1.63; P < .001). Cognitive Function Index participant report showed nonsignificant worsening at month 12. Systemic and neuropsychiatric-related treatment-emergent AEs were greater in atabecestat groups vs placebo. After stopping treatment, follow-up cognitive testing and AE assessment provided evidence of reversibility of drug-induced cognitive worsening and AEs in atabecestat groups. Conclusions and relevance: Atabecestat treatment was associated with dose-related cognitive worsening as early as 3 months and presence of neuropsychiatric treatment-emergent AEs, with evidence of reversibility after 6 months off treatment.Item Plasma Total-Tau and Neurofilament Light Chain as Diagnostic Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Adults with Down Syndrome(IOS Press, 2021) Petersen, Melissa E.; Rafii, Michael S.; Zhang, Fan; Hall, James; Julovich, David; Ances, Beau M.; Schupf, Nicole; Krinsky-McHale, Sharon J.; Mapstone, Mark; Silverman, Wayne; Lott, Ira; Klunk, William; Head, Elizabeth; Christian, Brad; Foroud, Tatiana; Lai, Florence; Rosas, H. Diana; Zaman, Shahid; Wang, Mei-Cheng; Tycko, Benjamin; Lee, Joseph H.; Handen, Benjamin; Hartley, Sigan; Fortea, Juan; O’Bryant, Sid; Alzheimer’s Biomarker Consortium – Down Syndrome (ABC-DS); Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineBackground: The need for diagnostic biomarkers of cognitive decline is particularly important among aging adults with Down syndrome (DS). Growing empirical support has identified the utility of plasma derived biomarkers among neurotypical adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the application of such biomarkers has been limited among the DS population. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the cross-sectional diagnostic performance of plasma neurofilament light chain (Nf-L) and total-tau, individually and in combination among a cohort of DS adults. Methods: Plasma samples were analyzed from n = 305 (n = 225 cognitively stable (CS); n = 44 MCI-DS; n = 36 DS-AD) participants enrolled in the Alzheimer's Biomarker Consortium -Down Syndrome. Results: In distinguishing DS-AD participants from CS, Nf-L alone produced an AUC of 90%, total-tau alone reached 74%, and combined reached an AUC of 86%. When age and gender were included, AUC increased to 93%. Higher values of Nf-L, total-tau, and age were all shown to be associated with increased risk for DS-AD. When distinguishing MCI-DS participants from CS, Nf-L alone produced an AUC of 65%, while total-tau alone reached 56%. A combined model with Nf-L, total-tau, age, and gender produced an AUC of 87%. Both higher values in age and total-tau were found to increase risk for MCI-DS; Nf-L levels were not associated with increased risk for MCI-DS. Conclusion: Advanced assay techniques make total-tau and particularly Nf-L useful biomarkers of both AD pathology and clinical status in DS and have the potential to serve as outcome measures in clinical trials for future disease-modifying drugs.