Browsing by Author "Pruitt, Sandi L."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Emergency department involvement in the diagnosis of cancer among older adults: a SEER-Medicare study
    (Oxford University Press, 2024) Thompson, Caroline A.; Sheridan, Paige; Metwally, Eman; Peacock Hinton, Sharon; Mullins, Megan A.; Dillon, Ellis C.; Thompson, Matthew; Pettit, Nicholas; Kurian, Allison W.; Pruitt, Sandi L.; Lyratzopoulos, Georgios; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Internationally, 20% to 50% of cancer is diagnosed through emergency presentation, which is associated with lower survival, poor patient experience, and socioeconomic disparities, but population-based evidence about emergency diagnosis in the United States is limited. We estimated emergency department (ED) involvement in the diagnosis of cancer in a nationally representative population of older US adults, and its association with sociodemographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics. Methods: We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare data for Medicare beneficiaries (≥66 years old) with a diagnosis of female breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers (2008-2017), defining their earliest cancer-related claim as their index date, and patients who visited the ED 0 to 30 days before their index date to have "ED involvement" in their diagnosis, with stratification as 0 to 7 or 8 to 30 days. We estimated covariate-adjusted associations of patient age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status, comorbidity score, tumor stage, year of diagnosis, rurality, and census-tract poverty with ED involvement using modified Poisson regression. Results: Among 614 748 patients, 23% had ED involvement, with 18% visiting the ED in the 0 to 7 days before their index date. This rate varied greatly by tumor site, with breast cancer at 8%, colorectal cancer at 39%, lung cancer at 40%, and prostate cancer at 7%. In adjusted models, older age, female sex, non-Hispanic Black and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander race, being unmarried, recent year of diagnosis, later-stage disease, comorbidities, and poverty were associated with ED involvement. Conclusions: The ED may be involved in the initial identification of cancer for 1 in 5 patients. Earlier, system-level identification of cancer in non-ED settings should be prioritized, especially among underserved populations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Racial and Ethnic Survival Disparities Among Children With High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Children's Oncology Group Report
    (American Medical Association, 2025-02-03) Umaretiya, Puja J.; Naranjo, Arlene; Zhang, Fan F.; Park, Julie R.; Weiss, Brian D.; Granger, Meaghan; Desai, Ami V.; Ozkaynak, M. Fevzi; Yu, Alice L.; Aziz-Bose, Rahela; Pruitt, Sandi L.; DuBois, Steven G.; Bagatell, Rochelle; Bona, Kira; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Importance: Whether population-based racial and ethnic survival disparities for children with high-risk neuroblastoma persist in the clinical trial setting is unknown. Objective: To investigate racial and ethnic survival disparities among children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on frontline clinical trials. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from Children's Oncology Group (COG) high-risk neuroblastoma trials from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, with a data freeze on June 30, 2021. Children with high-risk neuroblastoma were analyzed in 2 cohorts: induction/consolidation trial participants and post-consolidation trial participants. Statistical analyses were performed from September 2, 2021, to December 30, 2024. Exposures: Race and ethnicity were the primary exposures, categorized as Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic other (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander), or non-Hispanic White. Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) from time of trial enrollment, estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Associations with race and ethnicity were evaluated by log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Secondary outcomes included induction delays, early trial withdrawal, relapse as first event, death as first event, postrelapse OS, and early phase trial enrollment. Results: The induction/consolidation cohort (median follow-up, 8.3 years [IQR, 6.1-9.8 years]) included 696 patients (404 males [58.1%]; 79 Hispanic patients [11.4%], 109 non-Hispanic Black patients [15.7%], 27 patients of non-Hispanic other race [3.9%], and 481 non-Hispanic White patients [69.1%]). The post-consolidation cohort (median follow-up, 7.5 years [IQR, 5.8-9.4 years]) included 935 patients (567 males [60.6%]; 87 Hispanic patients [9.3%], 145 non-Hispanic Black patients [15.5%], 41 patients of non-Hispanic other race [4.4%], and 662 non-Hispanic White patients [70.8%]). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, Hispanic children experienced significantly inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.53; P = .01) on induction/consolidation studies compared with non-Hispanic White children; EFS did not differ. Non-Hispanic Black (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.13-2.11) and Hispanic children (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.09-2.43) experienced inferior OS on post-consolidation studies compared with non-Hispanic White children (P = .009); Hispanic children in post-consolidation studies experienced inferior EFS (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.14-2.47; P = .02). Death as first event and postrelapse OS also differed by race and ethnicity. Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that Black and Hispanic children with high-risk neuroblastoma experienced inferior OS despite uniform planned treatment on frontline COG clinical trials. Investigated mechanisms did not completely explain survival disparities. Future evaluation of disparate treatment-related toxicities and postrelapse care as explanatory mechanisms are key next steps to promote equity.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Registry versus claims-based index dates for studies of cancer diagnosis in administrative data
    (Springer, 2025) Soppe, Sarah E.; Peacock Hinton, Sharon; Halula, Jamie C.; Lund, Jennifer L.; Baggett, Chris D.; Pruitt, Sandi L.; Mullins, Megan A.; Dillon, Ellis C.; Barclay, Matthew E.; Thompson, Matthew; Pettit, Nicholas; Lyratzopoulos, Georgios; Thompson, Caroline A.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Studies of healthcare encounters leading to cancer diagnosis have increased over recent years. While some studies examine healthcare utilization before the cancer registry date of diagnosis, relevant pre-diagnosis interactions are not always immediately prior to this date due to date abstraction guidelines. We evaluated agreement of a registry date with a claims-based index and examined Emergency Department (ED) involvement in cancer diagnosis as an example of possible pre-diagnostic healthcare misclassification that could arise from improper date choice. Methods: We implemented an algorithm to define a claims-based index as the date of the earliest International Classification of Diseases code for the cancer in Medicare and estimated agreement with the date of diagnosis from a North Carolina registry for patients diagnosed aged 66 or older with 16 cancer types from 2008 to 2017 (n = 92,056). We then classified whether each cancer was initially diagnosed through care originating in the ED using each date. Results: The index date was identical to the cancer registry date for 47% of patients and preceded the registry date for 28%, with extent of agreement varying by cancer- and patient-specific characteristics. Agreement in ED-involved diagnosis classification using each date varied by cancer site, with sensitivity of classifications using the registry date relative to the index having a minimum of 86% for prostate and kidney cancer. Conclusion: Studies assessing healthcare utilization proximal to cancer diagnosis should carefully consider the relevant assessment window and be aware that the use of cancer registry versus claims-based dates may impact variable classification.