Browsing by Author "Powell, Byron J."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Core implementation strategies for improving cirrhosis care in the Veterans Health Administration
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Yakovchenko, Vera; Morgan, Timothy R.; Miech, Edward J.; Neely, Brittney; Lamorte, Carolyn; Gibson, Sandra; Beste, Lauren A.; McCurdy, Heather; Scott, Dawn; Gonzalez, Rachel; Park, Angela; Powell, Byron J.; Bajaj, Jasmohan S.; Dominitz, Jason A.; Chartier, Maggie; Ross, David; Chinman, Matthew J.; Rogal, Shari S.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background and aims: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides care for more than 80,000 veterans with cirrhosis. This longitudinal, multimethod evaluation of a cirrhosis care quality improvement program aimed to (1) identify implementation strategies associated with evidence-based, guideline-concordant cirrhosis care over time, and (2) use qualitative interviews to operationalize strategies for a manualized intervention. Approach and results: VHA providers were surveyed annually about the use of 73 implementation strategies to improve cirrhosis care in fiscal years 2018 (FY18) and 2019 (FY19). Implementation strategies linked to guideline-concordant cirrhosis care were identified using bivariate statistics and comparative configurational methods. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 facilities in the highest quartile of cirrhosis care to specify the successful implementation strategies and their mechanisms of change. A total of 106 VHA facilities (82%) responded at least once over the 2-year period (FY18, n = 63; FY19, n = 100). Facilities reported using a median of 12 (interquartile range [IQR] 20) implementation strategies in FY18 and 10 (IQR 19) in FY19. Of the 73 strategies, 35 (48%) were positively correlated with provision of evidence-based cirrhosis care. Configurational analysis identified multiple strategy pathways directly linked to more guideline-concordant cirrhosis care. Across both methods, a subset of eight strategies was determined to be core to cirrhosis care improvement and specified using qualitative interviews. Conclusions: In a national cirrhosis care improvement initiative, a multimethod approach identified a core subset of successful implementation strategy combinations. This process of empirically identifying and specifying implementation strategies may be applicable to other implementation challenges in hepatology.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Implementing a Mandated Program Across a Regional Health Care System: A Rapid Qualitative Assessment to Evaluate Early Implementation Strategies
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2019-09-01) Sperber, Nina R.; Bruening, Rebecca A.; Choate, Ashley; Mahanna, Elizabeth; Wang, Virginia; Powell, Byron J.; Damush, Teresa; Jackson, George L.; Van Houtven, Courtney H.; Allen, Kelli D.; Hastings, Susan N.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Rapid qualitative assessement was used to describe early strategies to implement an evidence-based walking program for hospitalized older adults, assiSTed eaRly mobIlity for hospitalizeD older vEterans (STRIDE), mandated by a regional Veterans Affairs health care system office (VISN). Data were collected from 6 hospital sites via semi-structured interviews with key informants, observations of telephone-based technical assistance (TA), and review of VISN-requested program documents (e.g., initial implementation plans). An overaching framework of actionable feedback for VISN leadership and specification of locally initiated implementation strategies, using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation, was used. Actionable feedback was shared with VISN leadership one month after the initiative. ERIC implementation strategies identified were: 1) Promoting Adaptability- Four sites had physical therapists (PT)/ kinesiotherapists (KT) instead of assistants walk patients, 2) Promoting Network Weaving- Strengthening nursing and PT/ KT partnership with regular communication opportunities or a point person was important for implementation, 3) Distributing Educational Materials – Two sites distributed information about STRIDE via email and in-person, and 4) Organizing Clinician Implementation Team Meetings – Three sites used interdisciplinary team meetings to communicate with clinical staff about STRIDE. This qualitative study sheds light on early experiences with implementing STRIDE; the results have been instructive for ongoing implementation and future dissemination of STRIDE, and the approach can be applied across contexts to inform implementation of other programs.