- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Peycelon, Matthieu"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Correspondence: transurethral catheter drainage in febrile urinary tract infection—practice patterns among specialized centers in North America and Europe(Elsevier, 2019-12) Salama, Amr K.; Haid, Bernhard; Strasser, Christa; Smith, Caroline; Spinoit, Anne-Françoise; Saad, Kahlil N.; Peycelon, Matthieu; Urology, School of MedicineItem Management of lower urinary tract fibroepithelial polyps in children(Elsevier, 2020) Rousseau, Sybille; Peycelon, Matthieu; Grosos, Céline; Bidault, Valeska; Poupalou, Anna; Martin, Garance; Dobremez, Éric; Harper, Luke; Raquillet, Claire; Arnaud, Alexis; Sapin, Emmanuel; Scalabre, Aurélien; Buisson, Philippe; Levard, Guillaume; Pommepuy, Isabelle; Pons, Maguelonne; Fourcade, Laurent; Ballouhey, Quentin; Urology, School of MedicineIntroduction Fibroepithelial polyps (FEP) of the lower urinary tract are relatively common in adults but rare in children, with fewer than 250 cases reported in the literature to date. Objective The aim of this study was to address the experience of FEP management in children. Study design A retrospective multicenter review was undertaken in children with defined FEP of the lower urinary tract managed between 2008 and 2018. The data at 18 pediatric surgery centers were collected. Their demographic, radiological, surgical, and pathological information were reviewed. Results A total of 33 children (26 boys; 7 girls) were treated for FEP of the lower urinary tract at 13 centers. The most common presentation was urinary outflow as hematuria (41%), acute urinary retention (25%), dysuria (19%), or urinary infections (28%). A prenatal diagnosis was made for three patients with hydronephrosis. Almost all of the children (94%) underwent ultrasound imaging of the urinary tract as the first diagnostic examination, 23 (70%) of them also either had an MRI (15%), cystourethrography (25%), computerized tomography (6%), or cystoscopy (45%). Two of these children (6%) had a biopsy prior to the surgery. The median preoperative delay was 7.52 (range: 1–48) months. Most of the patients were treated endoscopically, although four (12.1%) had open surgery and two (6.1%) had an additional incision for specimen extraction. The median hospital stay was 1.5 (range: 1–10) days. There were no recurrences and no complications after a median follow-up of 13 (range: 1–34) months. Discussion The main limitation of our study is the retrospective design, although it is the largest one for this pathology. Conclusion This series supports sonography as the most suitable diagnosis tool before endoscopy to confirm the diagnosis and to perform the resection for most FEP in children. This report confirms the recognized benign nature in the absence of recurrences.Item Testicular-sparing surgery in the pediatric population: Multicenter review of practice with review of the literature(Wolters Kluwer, 2019-09) Radford, Anna; Peycelon, Matthieu; Haid, Bernhard; Powis, Mark; Lakshminarayanan, Bhanu; Surgery, School of MedicinePurpose of review Pediatric testicular tumors have predominantly favorable histology, which may permit testicular sparing surgery (TSS). Limited guidance exists for TSS in adults and is absent in pediatric practice. The international survey and retrospective case series evaluated the current use of TSS in pediatric testicular tumors. Alongside the complementary literature review, the aim of this work was to provide evidence that could be used to produce a guideline document. Recent findings Published evidence advocates small mass size as an indicator for TSS, this was not supported in the pediatric literature. Frozen section examination at TSS was not always performed by surgeons and yet the literature reports close to 100% specificity. Tumor markers and ultrasound findings are also used as indicators for TSS, a finding reflected in our survey results. Summary Multiple case series are reported but no large data series exists, which will require international collaboration rather than a drive to publish the results of individual centers. Common indicators for TSS use; such as tumor markers and imaging are known but further work needs to evaluate the role of on-table histology and the risks of this not being available.