Browsing by Author "Pericak-Vance, Margaret A."
Now showing 1 - 10 of 36
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A genome-wide search for pleiotropy in more than 100,000 harmonized longitudinal cognitive domain scores(BMC, 2023-06-22) Kang, Moonil; Ang, Ting Fang Alvin; Devine, Sherral A.; Sherva, Richard; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Gibbons, Laura E.; Scollard, Phoebe; Lee, Michael; Choi, Seo-Eun; Klinedinst, Brandon; Nakano, Connie; Dumitrescu, Logan C.; Durant, Alaina; Hohman, Timothy J.; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Kukull, Walter A.; Bennett, David A.; Wang, Li-San; Mayeux, Richard P.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Crane, Paul K.; Au, Rhoda; Lunetta, Kathryn L.; Mez, Jesse B.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineBackground: More than 75 common variant loci account for only a portion of the heritability for Alzheimer's disease (AD). A more complete understanding of the genetic basis of AD can be deduced by exploring associations with AD-related endophenotypes. Methods: We conducted genome-wide scans for cognitive domain performance using harmonized and co-calibrated scores derived by confirmatory factor analyses for executive function, language, and memory. We analyzed 103,796 longitudinal observations from 23,066 members of community-based (FHS, ACT, and ROSMAP) and clinic-based (ADRCs and ADNI) cohorts using generalized linear mixed models including terms for SNP, age, SNP × age interaction, sex, education, and five ancestry principal components. Significance was determined based on a joint test of the SNP's main effect and interaction with age. Results across datasets were combined using inverse-variance meta-analysis. Genome-wide tests of pleiotropy for each domain pair as the outcome were performed using PLACO software. Results: Individual domain and pleiotropy analyses revealed genome-wide significant (GWS) associations with five established loci for AD and AD-related disorders (BIN1, CR1, GRN, MS4A6A, and APOE) and eight novel loci. ULK2 was associated with executive function in the community-based cohorts (rs157405, P = 2.19 × 10-9). GWS associations for language were identified with CDK14 in the clinic-based cohorts (rs705353, P = 1.73 × 10-8) and LINC02712 in the total sample (rs145012974, P = 3.66 × 10-8). GRN (rs5848, P = 4.21 × 10-8) and PURG (rs117523305, P = 1.73 × 10-8) were associated with memory in the total and community-based cohorts, respectively. GWS pleiotropy was observed for language and memory with LOC107984373 (rs73005629, P = 3.12 × 10-8) in the clinic-based cohorts, and with NCALD (rs56162098, P = 1.23 × 10-9) and PTPRD (rs145989094, P = 8.34 × 10-9) in the community-based cohorts. GWS pleiotropy was also found for executive function and memory with OSGIN1 (rs12447050, P = 4.09 × 10-8) and PTPRD (rs145989094, P = 3.85 × 10-8) in the community-based cohorts. Functional studies have previously linked AD to ULK2, NCALD, and PTPRD. Conclusion: Our results provide some insight into biological pathways underlying processes leading to domain-specific cognitive impairment and AD, as well as a conduit toward a syndrome-specific precision medicine approach to AD. Increasing the number of participants with harmonized cognitive domain scores will enhance the discovery of additional genetic factors of cognitive decline leading to AD and related dementias.Item A global view of the genetic basis of Alzheimer disease(Springer Nature, 2023) Reitz, Christiane; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Foroud, Tatiana; Mayeux, Richard; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineThe risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) increases with age, family history and informative genetic variants. Sadly, there is still no cure or means of prevention. As in other complex diseases, uncovering genetic causes of AD could identify underlying pathological mechanisms and lead to potential treatments. Rare, autosomal dominant forms of AD occur in middle age as a result of highly penetrant genetic mutations, but the most common form of AD occurs later in life. Large-scale, genome-wide analyses indicate that 70 or more genes or loci contribute to AD. One of the major factors limiting progress is that most genetic data have been obtained from non-Hispanic white individuals in Europe and North America, preventing the development of personalized approaches to AD in individuals of other ethnicities. Fortunately, emerging genetic data from other regions - including Africa, Asia, India and South America - are now providing information on the disease from a broader range of ethnicities. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on AD genetics in populations across the world. We predominantly focus on replicated genetic discoveries but also include studies in ethnic groups where replication might not be feasible. We attempt to identify gaps that need to be addressed to achieve a complete picture of the genetic and molecular factors that drive AD in individuals across the globe.Item A locus at 19q13.31 significantly reduces the ApoE ε4 risk for Alzheimer's Disease in African Ancestry(Public Library of Science, 2022-07-05) Rajabli, Farid; Beecham, Gary W.; Hendrie, Hugh C.; Baiyewu, Olusegun; Ogunniyi, Adesola; Gao, Sujuan; Kushch, Nicholas A.; Lipkin-Vasquez, Marina; Hamilton-Nelson, Kara L.; Young, Juan I.; Dykxhoorn, Derek M.; Nuytemans, Karen; Kunkle, Brian W.; Wang, Liyong; Jin, Fulai; Liu, Xiaoxiao; Feliciano-Astacio, Briseida E.; Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project; Alzheimer’s Disease Genetic Consortium; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Dalgard, Clifton L.; Griswold, Anthony J.; Byrd, Goldie S.; Reitz, Christiane; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Vance, Jeffery M.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineAfrican descent populations have a lower Alzheimer disease risk from ApoE ε4 compared to other populations. Ancestry analysis showed that the difference in risk between African and European populations lies in the ancestral genomic background surrounding the ApoE locus (local ancestry). Identifying the mechanism(s) of this protection could lead to greater insight into the etiology of Alzheimer disease and more personalized therapeutic intervention. Our objective is to follow up the local ancestry finding and identify the genetic variants that drive this risk difference and result in a lower risk for developing Alzheimer disease in African ancestry populations. We performed association analyses using a logistic regression model with the ApoE ε4 allele as an interaction term and adjusted for genome-wide ancestry, age, and sex. Discovery analysis included imputed SNP data of 1,850 Alzheimer disease and 4,331 cognitively intact African American individuals. We performed replication analyses on 63 whole genome sequenced Alzheimer disease and 648 cognitively intact Ibadan individuals. Additionally, we reproduced results using whole-genome sequencing of 273 Alzheimer disease and 275 cognitively intact admixed Puerto Rican individuals. A further comparison was done with SNP imputation from an additional 8,463 Alzheimer disease and 11,365 cognitively intact non-Hispanic White individuals. We identified a significant interaction between the ApoE ε4 allele and the SNP rs10423769_A allele, (β = -0.54,SE = 0.12,p-value = 7.50x10-6) in the discovery data set, and replicated this finding in Ibadan (β = -1.32,SE = 0.52,p-value = 1.15x10-2) and Puerto Rican (β = -1.27,SE = 0.64,p-value = 4.91x10-2) individuals. The non-Hispanic Whites analyses showed an interaction trending in the "protective" direction but failing to pass a 0.05 significance threshold (β = -1.51,SE = 0.84,p-value = 7.26x10-2). The presence of the rs10423769_A allele reduces the odds ratio for Alzheimer disease risk from 7.2 for ApoE ε4/ε4 carriers lacking the A allele to 2.1 for ApoE ε4/ε4 carriers with at least one A allele. This locus is located approximately 2 mB upstream of the ApoE locus, in a large cluster of pregnancy specific beta-1 glycoproteins on chromosome 19 and lies within a long noncoding RNA, ENSG00000282943. This study identified a new African-ancestry specific locus that reduces the risk effect of ApoE ε4 for developing Alzheimer disease. The mechanism of the interaction with ApoEε4 is not known but suggests a novel mechanism for reducing the risk for ε4 carriers opening the possibility for potential ancestry-specific therapeutic intervention.Item A multiethnic transcriptome for Alzheimer Disease identifies cross‐ancestry and ancestry‐specific expression profiles(Wiley, 2025-01-03) Yang, Zikun; Cieza, Basilio; Reyes-Dumeyer, Dolly; Lee, Annie J.; Dugger, Brittany N.; Jin, Lee-Way; Murray, Melissa E.; Dickson, Dennis W.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Vance, Jeffery M.; Foroud, Tatiana M.; Teich, Andrew F.; Mayeux, Richard; Tosto, Giuseppe; Neurology, School of MedicineBackground: Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) presents complex molecular heterogeneity, influenced by a variety of factors including heterogeneous phenotypic, genetic, and neuropathologic presentations. Regulation of gene expression mechanisms is a primary interest of investigations aiming to uncover the underlying disease mechanisms and progression. Method: We generated bulk RNA‐sequencing in prefrontal cortex from 565 AD brain samples (non‐Hispanic Whites, n = 399; Hispanics, n = 113; African American, n = 12) across six U.S. brain banks, and conducted differential gene expression and enrichment analyses. We sought to identify cross‐ancestry and ancestry‐specific differentially expressed genes (DEG) and pathways across Braak stages, adjusting for sex, age at death, and RNA quality metrics. We validated our findings using the Religious Orders Study/Memory and Aging Project study (ROS/MAP, n = 1,095). Lastly, we validated top DEG using publically‐available human single‐nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) data. Result: AD‐known genes VGF (LFC = ‐0.661, padj = 3.78) and ADAMTS2 (padj = 1.21) were consistently differentially expressed across statistical models, ethnic groups, and replicated in ROS/MAP (Figure 1). Genes from the heat shock protein (HSP) family, e.g. HSPB7 (padj = 3.78), were the top DEG, also replicated in ROS/MAP. Ethnic‐stratified analyses prioritized TNFSF14 and SPOCD1 as top DEG in Hispanic samples. Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted several significantly pathways, including “TYROBP causal network in microglia” (WP3945; padj = 1.68) and “Alzheimer Disease” (WP5124; padj = 4.24). snRNAseq validated several DEG, including VGF downregulated in neurons (padj = 1.1). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest diverse transcriptome study for AD in post‐mortem tissue. We identified perturbated genes and pathways resulting in cross‐ethnic and ethnic‐specific findings, ultimately highlighting the importance of diversity in AD investigations.Item The Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project: Study design and sample selection(Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2017-10-13) Beecham, Gary W.; Bis, J.C.; Martin, E.R.; Choi, S.-H.; DeStefano, A. L.; van Duijn, C.M.; Fornage, M.; Gabriel, S.B.; Koboldt, D.C.; Larson, D.E.; Naj, A.C.; Psaty, B.M.; Salerno, W.; Bush, W.S.; Foroud, T.M.; Wijsman, E.; Farrer, L.A.; Goate, A.; Haines, J.L.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Boerwinkle, E.; Mayeux, R.; Seshadri, S.; Schellenberg, G.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineItem APOE Promoter Polymorphism-219T/G is an Effect Modifier of the Influence of APOE ε4 on Alzheimer's Disease Risk in a Multiracial Sample(MDPI, 2019-08-16) Choi, Kyu Yeong; Lee, Jang Jae; Gunasekaran, Tamil Iniyan; Kang, Sarang; Lee, Wooje; Jeong, Jangho; Lim, Ho Jae; Zhang, Xiaoling; Zhu, Congcong; Won, So-Yoon; Choi, Yu Yong; Seo, Eun Hyun; Lee, Seok Cheol; Gim, Jungsoo; Chung, Ji Yeon; Chong, Ari; Byun, Min Soo; Seo, Sujin; Ko, Pan-Woo; Han, Ji-Won; McLean, Catriona; Farrell, John; Lunetta, Kathryn L.; Miyashita, Akinori; Hara, Norikazu; Won, Sungho; Choi, Seong-Min; Ha, Jung-Min; Jeong, Jee Hyang; Kuwano, Ryozo; Song, Min Kyung; An, Seong Soo A.; Lee, Young Min; Park, Kyung Won; Lee, Ho-Won; Choi, Seong Hye; Rhee, Sangmyung; Song, Woo Keun; Lee, Jung Sup; Mayeux, Richard; Haines, Jonathan L.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Choo, IL Han; Nho, Kwangsik; Kim, Ki-Woong; Lee, Dong Young; Kim, SangYun; Kim, Byeong C.; Kim, Hoowon; Jun, Gyungah R.; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Ikeuchi, Takeshi; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Lee, Kun Ho; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineVariants in the APOE gene region may explain ethnic differences in the association of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with ε4. Ethnic differences in allele frequencies for three APOE region SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) were identified and tested for association in 19,398 East Asians (EastA), including Koreans and Japanese, 15,836 European ancestry (EuroA) individuals, and 4985 African Americans, and with brain imaging measures of cortical atrophy in sub-samples of Koreans and EuroAs. Among ε4/ε4 individuals, AD risk increased substantially in a dose-dependent manner with the number of APOE promoter SNP rs405509 T alleles in EastAs (TT: OR (odds ratio) = 27.02, p = 8.80 × 10-94; GT: OR = 15.87, p = 2.62 × 10-9) and EuroAs (TT: OR = 18.13, p = 2.69 × 10-108; GT: OR = 12.63, p = 3.44 × 10-64), and rs405509-T homozygotes had a younger onset and more severe cortical atrophy than those with G-allele. Functional experiments using APOE promoter fragments demonstrated that TT lowered APOE expression in human brain and serum. The modifying effect of rs405509 genotype explained much of the ethnic variability in the AD/ε4 association, and increasing APOE expression might lower AD risk among ε4 homozygotes.Item Association between known Alzheimer’s disease risk genetic variants and hippocampal atrophy along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum in a Korean cohort(Wiley, 2025-01-03) Ahn, Hyejin; Byun, Min Soo; Yi, Dahyun; Jung, Gijung; Huang, Yen-Ning; Risacher, Shannon L.; Griswold, Anthony J.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Kim, Yu Kyeong; Lee, Yun-Sang; Sohn, Chul-Ho; Kang, Koung Mi; Lee, Jun-Young; Saykin, Andrew J.; Nho, Kwangsik; Lee, Dong Young; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineBackground: Large‐scale genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from European ancestry identified many genetic variants associated with clinical diagnosis of AD dementia. However, it remains unclear whether these AD‐related variants are associated with AD biomarkers, particularly hippocampal atrophy, a well‐known neurodegeneration biomarker of AD in a Korean population. In this study, we investigated the association between known AD risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and hippocampal atrophy along the AD continuum in older Korean adults. Method: A total of 487 participants (258 cognitively normal olde adults [CN], 144 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], 85 AD dementia) from the Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease (KBASE) were included for analysis. All participants underwent 11C‐PiB‐PET/MRI. Hippocampal volume adjusted for intracranial volume (HVa) was obtained from 3D T1‐weighted MRI scans using FreeSurfer and used as a neurodegeneration marker of AD. Global beta‐amyloid (Aβ) deposition was calculated from PiB uptake in the global cortical region‐of‐interest using SPM12. From the genetic evidence gathered by the AD Sequencing Project (ADSP), which consists of 76 SNPs associated with AD, we selected 38 SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 1% from the genotyping data imputed using the TOPMed imputation server in the KBASE cohort. Result: Among 38 known AD‐related SNPs, three SNPs (rs6966331 in EPDR1, rs2242595 in MYO15A, and rs17125924 in FERMT2) were associated with HVa in an initial exploratory analysis (p<0.05). In a subsequent confirmatory analysis, the associations of rs6966331 in EPDR1 and rs2242595 in MYO15A with HVa remained significant after controlling for age, sex, and APOE4 carrier status, as well as global Aβ deposition (p<0.001 and p = 0.009 for rs6966331 and rs2242595, respectively) (Table 1). Conclusion: Our study identified associations of rs6966331 in EPDR1 and rs2242595 in MYO15A with hippocampal volume in Korean older adults, and these associations were independent of cerebral Aβ deposition and APOE4 carrier status. These findings suggest that these AD‐related loci may contribute to the development of AD dementia via Aβ‐independent neurodegeneration.Item Association of Long Runs of Homozygosity With Alzheimer Disease Among African American Individuals(American Medical Association, 2015-11) Ghani, Mahdi; Reitz, Christiane; Cheng, Rong; Vardarajan, Badri Narayan; Jun, Gyungah; Sato, Christine; Naj, Adam; Rajbhandary, Ruchita; Wang, Li-San; Valladares, Otto; Lin, Chiao-Feng; Larson, Eric B.; Graff-Radford, Neill R.; Evans, Denis; De Jager, Philip L.; Crane, Paul K.; Buxbaum, Joseph D.; Murrell, Jill R.; Raj, Towfique; Ertekin-Taner, Nilufer; Logue, Mark; Baldwin, Clinton T.; Green, Robert C.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Cantwell, Laura B.; Fallin, M. Daniele; Go, Rodney C. P.; Griffith, Patrick A.; Obisesan, Thomas O.; Manly, Jennifer J.; Lunetta, Kathryn L.; Kamboh, M. Ilyas; Lopez, Oscar L.; Bennett, David A.; Hendrie, Hugh; Hall, Kathleen S.; Goate, Alison M.; Byrd, Goldie S.; Kukull, Walter A.; Foroud, Tatiana M.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Lee, Joseph H.; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; St. George-Hyslop, Peter; Mayeux, Richard; Rogaeva, Ekaterina; Department of Psychiatry, IU School of MedicineIMPORTANCE: Mutations in known causal Alzheimer disease (AD) genes account for only 1% to 3% of patients and almost all are dominantly inherited. Recessive inheritance of complex phenotypes can be linked to long (>1-megabase [Mb]) runs of homozygosity (ROHs) detectable by single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between ROHs and AD in an African American population known to have a risk for AD up to 3 times higher than white individuals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Case-control study of a large African American data set previously genotyped on different genome-wide SNP arrays conducted from December 2013 to January 2015. Global and locus-based ROH measurements were analyzed using raw or imputed genotype data. We studied the raw genotypes from 2 case-control subsets grouped based on SNP array: Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium data set (871 cases and 1620 control individuals) and Chicago Health and Aging Project-Indianapolis Ibadan Dementia Study data set (279 cases and 1367 control individuals). We then examined the entire data set using imputed genotypes from 1917 cases and 3858 control individuals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The ROHs larger than 1 Mb, 2 Mb, or 3 Mb were investigated separately for global burden evaluation, consensus regions, and gene-based analyses. RESULTS: The African American cohort had a low degree of inbreeding (F ~ 0.006). In the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium data set, we detected a significantly higher proportion of cases with ROHs greater than 2 Mb (P = .004) or greater than 3 Mb (P = .02), as well as a significant 114-kilobase consensus region on chr4q31.3 (empirical P value 2 = .04; ROHs >2 Mb). In the Chicago Health and Aging Project-Indianapolis Ibadan Dementia Study data set, we identified a significant 202-kilobase consensus region on Chr15q24.1 (empirical P value 2 = .02; ROHs >1 Mb) and a cluster of 13 significant genes on Chr3p21.31 (empirical P value 2 = .03; ROHs >3 Mb). A total of 43 of 49 nominally significant genes common for both data sets also mapped to Chr3p21.31. Analyses of imputed SNP data from the entire data set confirmed the association of AD with global ROH measurements (12.38 ROHs >1 Mb in cases vs 12.11 in controls; 2.986 Mb average size of ROHs >2 Mb in cases vs 2.889 Mb in controls; and 22% of cases with ROHs >3 Mb vs 19% of controls) and a gene-cluster on Chr3p21.31 (empirical P value 2 = .006-.04; ROHs >3 Mb). Also, we detected a significant association between AD and CLDN17 (empirical P value 2 = .01; ROHs >1 Mb), encoding a protein from the Claudin family, members of which were previously suggested as AD biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, we discovered the first evidence of increased burden of ROHs among patients with AD from an outbred African American population, which could reflect either the cumulative effect of multiple ROHs to AD or the contribution of specific loci harboring recessive mutations and risk haplotypes in a subset of patients. Sequencing is required to uncover AD variants in these individuals.Item Associations of Sex, Race, and Apolipoprotein E Alleles With Multiple Domains of Cognition Among Older Adults(American Medical Association, 2023) Walters, Skylar; Contreras, Alex G.; Eissman, Jaclyn M.; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse B.; Bush, William S.; Kunkle, Brian W.; Naj, Adam C.; Peterson, Amalia; Gifford, Katherine A.; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li-San; Haines, Jonathan L.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Kukull, Walter A.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Thompson, Paul M.; Martin, Eden R.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Crane, Paul K.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium; Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineImportance: Sex differences are established in associations between apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease (AD). However, it is unclear whether sex-specific cognitive consequences of APOE are consistent across races and extend to the APOE ε2 allele. Objective: To investigate whether sex and race modify APOE ε4 and ε2 associations with cognition. Design, setting, and participants: This genetic association study included longitudinal cognitive data from 4 AD and cognitive aging cohorts. Participants were older than 60 years and self-identified as non-Hispanic White or non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, White and Black). Data were previously collected across multiple US locations from 1994 to 2018. Secondary analyses began December 2021 and ended September 2022. Main outcomes and measures: Harmonized composite scores for memory, executive function, and language were generated using psychometric approaches. Linear regression assessed interactions between APOE ε4 or APOE ε2 and sex on baseline cognitive scores, while linear mixed-effect models assessed interactions on cognitive trajectories. The intersectional effect of race was modeled using an APOE × sex × race interaction term, assessing whether APOE × sex interactions differed by race. Models were adjusted for age at baseline and corrected for multiple comparisons. Results: Of 32 427 participants who met inclusion criteria, there were 19 007 females (59%), 4453 Black individuals (14%), and 27 974 White individuals (86%); the mean (SD) age at baseline was 74 years (7.9). At baseline, 6048 individuals (19%) had AD, 4398 (14%) were APOE ε2 carriers, and 12 538 (38%) were APOE ε4 carriers. Participants missing APOE status were excluded (n = 9266). For APOE ε4, a robust sex interaction was observed on baseline memory (β = -0.071, SE = 0.014; P = 9.6 × 10-7), whereby the APOE ε4 negative effect was stronger in females compared with males and did not significantly differ among races. Contrastingly, despite the large sample size, no APOE ε2 × sex interactions on cognition were observed among all participants. When testing for intersectional effects of sex, APOE ε2, and race, an interaction was revealed on baseline executive function among individuals who were cognitively unimpaired (β = -0.165, SE = 0.066; P = .01), whereby the APOE ε2 protective effect was female-specific among White individuals but male-specific among Black individuals. Conclusions and relevance: In this study, while race did not modify sex differences in APOE ε4, the APOE ε2 protective effect could vary by race and sex. Although female sex enhanced ε4-associated risk, there was no comparable sex difference in ε2, suggesting biological pathways underlying ε4-associated risk are distinct from ε2 and likely intersect with age-related changes in sex biology.Item Beyond GWAS: Investigating Structural Variants and Their Segregation in Familial Alzheimer’s Disease(Wiley, 2025-01-09) Gunasekaran, Tamil Iniyan; Reyes-Dumeyer, Dolly; Corvelo, André; Clarke, Wayne E.; Evani, Uday S.; Byrska-Bishop, Marta S.; Basile, Anna O.; Runnels, Alexi; Musunuri, Rajeeva O.; Narzisi, Giuseppe; Faber, Kelley M.; Goate, Alison M.; Boeve, Brad F.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Rosenberg, Roger N.; Tsuang, Debby W.; Rivera Mejia, Diones; Medrano, Martin; Lantigua, Rafael A.; Sweet, Robert; Bennett, David A.; Wilson, Robert S.; Foroud, Tatiana M.; Dalgard, Clifton L.; Mayeux, Richard; Zody, Michael; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineBackground: Late‐Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (LOAD) is characterized by genetic heterogeneity and there is no single model explaining the genetic mode of inheritance. To date, more than 70 genetic loci associated with AD have been identified but they explain only a small proportion of AD heritability. Structural variants (SVs) may explain some of the missing AD heritability, and specifically, their segregation in AD families has yet to be investigated. Method: We analyzed WGS data from 197 NHW families (926 subjects, 58.5% affected) and 214 CH families (1,340 subjects, 59.17% affected). Manta, Absinthe, and MELT were used for large insertions/deletions calling from short‐read WGS, combined with Sniffles2 calls from 4 ONT‐sequenced genomes and an external SV call set from HGSVC on 32 PacBio‐sequenced genomes from the 1000 Genomes Project. Genotyping produced a unified project‐level VCF. We identified 45,251 insertions and 76,566 deletions genome‐wide. Variants were tested for segregation and pathogenicity using Annot‐SV, cadd‐SV, and Variant Effect Predictor. Segregation required SV presence in all affected family members and only in unaffected members five years younger than average disease onset. Result: We identified 453 insertions and 598 deletions segregating in 78.68% and 87.31% of NHW families, respectively. In CH families, 432 insertions and 460 deletions were segregating in 75.23% and 72.90% of the families, respectively. Genes overlapping with the SVs exhibited high expression levels in brain tissues. Notably, around 93% of insertions and 76% of deletions segregating in NHW and CH families were less than 1 kilobase pair (1kbp) in length. A total of 79 insertions and 96 deletions were found to be segregating in both NHW and CH families. Interestingly, a segregating insertion was observed in CH families overlapping within the CACNA2D3 gene, which was previously reported in a CH GWAS for clinical AD. A deletion segregating in NHW overlapped with the PSEN1, and another in a CH family overlapped with the PTK2B gene. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that there are several SVs associated with familial AD across CH and NHW families. Prioritizing the SVs based on their effects on gene function and expression will be helpful in understanding their contributions in AD.