- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Pediatric Heart Network Investigators"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Height Versus Body Surface Area to Normalize Cardiovascular Measurements in Children Using the Pediatric Heart Network Echocardiographic Z-Score Database(Springer, 2021) Mahgerefteh, Joseph; Lai, Wyman; Colan, Steven; Trachtenberg, Felicia; Gongwer, Russel; Stylianou, Mario; Bhat, Aarti H.; Goldberg, David; McCrindle, Brian; Frommelt, Peter; Sachdeva, Ritu; Shuplock, Jacqueline Marie; Spurney, Christopher; Troung, Dongngan; Cnota, James F.; Camarda, Joseph A.; Levine, Jami; Pignatelli, Ricardo; Altmann, Karen; van der Velde, Mary; Thankavel, Poonam Punjwani; Chowdhury, Shahryar; Srivastava, Shubhika; Johnson, Tiffanie R.; Lopez, Leo; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators; Pediatrics, School of MedicineNormalizing cardiovascular measurements for body size allows for comparison among children of different ages and for distinguishing pathologic changes from normal physiologic growth. Because of growing interest to use height for normalization, the aim of this study was to develop height-based normalization models and compare them to body surface area (BSA)-based normalization for aortic and left ventricular (LV) measurements. The study population consisted of healthy, non-obese children between 2 and 18 years of age enrolled in the Pediatric Heart Network Echo Z-Score Project. The echocardiographic study parameters included proximal aortic diameters at 3 locations, LV end-diastolic volume, and LV mass. Using the statistical methodology described in the original project, Z-scores based on height and BSA were determined for the study parameters and tested for any clinically significant relationships with age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). Normalization models based on height versus BSA were compared among underweight, normal weight, and overweight (but not obese) children in the study population. Z-scores based on height and BSA were calculated for the 5 study parameters and revealed no clinically significant relationships with age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Normalization based on height resulted in lower Z-scores in the underweight group compared to the overweight group, whereas normalization based on BSA resulted in higher Z-scores in the underweight group compared to the overweight group. In other words, increasing BMI had an opposite effect on height-based Z-scores compared to BSA-based Z-scores. Allometric normalization based on height and BSA for aortic and LV sizes is feasible. However, height-based normalization results in higher cardiovascular Z-scores in heavier children, and BSA-based normalization results in higher cardiovascular Z-scores in lighter children. Further studies are needed to assess the performance of these approaches in obese children with or without cardiac disease.Item Impact of Major Residual Lesions on Outcomes after Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease(Elsevier, 2021) Nathan, Meena; Levine, Jami C.; Van Rompay, Maria I.; Lambert, Linda M.; Trachtenberg, Felicia L.; Colan, Steven D.; Adachi, Iki; Anderson, Brett R.; Bacha, Emile A.; Eckhauser, Aaron; Gaynor, J. William; Graham, Eric M.; Goot, Benjamin; Jacobs, Jeffrey P.; John, Rija; Kaltman, Jonathan R.; Kanter, Kirk R.; Mery, Carlos M.; Minich, L. LuAnn; Ohye, Richard; Overman, David; Pizarro, Christian; Raghuveer, Geetha; Schamberger, Marcus S.; Schwartz, Steven M.; Narasimhan, Shanthi L.; Taylor, Michael D.; Wang, Ke; Newburger, Jane W.; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground: Many factors affect outcomes after congenital cardiac surgery. Objectives: The RLS (Residual Lesion Score) study explored the impact of severity of residual lesions on post-operative outcomes across operations of varying complexity. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study, 17 sites enrolled 1,149 infants undergoing 5 common operations: tetralogy of Fallot repair (n = 250), complete atrioventricular septal defect repair (n = 249), arterial switch operation (n = 251), coarctation or interrupted arch with ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair (n = 150), and Norwood operation (n = 249). The RLS was assigned based on post-operative echocardiography and clinical events: RLS 1 (trivial or no residual lesions), RLS 2 (minor residual lesions), or RLS 3 (reintervention for or major residual lesions before discharge). The primary outcome was days alive and out of hospital within 30 post-operative days (60 for Norwood). Secondary outcomes assessed post-operative course, including major medical events and days in hospital. Results: RLS 3 (vs. RLS 1) was an independent risk factor for fewer days alive and out of hospital (p ≤ 0.008) and longer post-operative hospital stay (p ≤ 0.02) for all 5 operations, and for all secondary outcomes after coarctation or interrupted arch with VSD repair and Norwood (p ≤ 0.03). Outcomes for RLS 1 versus 2 did not differ consistently. RLS alone explained 5% (tetralogy of Fallot repair) to 20% (Norwood) of variation in the primary outcome. Conclusions: Adjusting for pre-operative factors, residual lesions after congenital cardiac surgery impacted in-hospital outcomes across operative complexity with greatest impact following complex operations. Minor residual lesions had minimal impact. These findings may provide guidance for surgeons when considering short-term risks and benefits of returning to bypass to repair residual lesions.Item Results of a phase I/II multi-center investigation of udenafil in adolescents after fontan palliation(Elsevier, 2017-06) Goldberg, David J.; Zak, Victor; Goldstein, Bryan H.; Chen, Shan; Hamstra, Michelle S.; Radojewski, Elizabeth A.; Maunsell, Eileen; Mital, Seema; Menon, Shaji C.; Schumacher, Kurt R.; Payne, R. Mark; Stylianou, Mario; Kaltman, Jonathan R.; deVries, Tina M.; Yeager, James L.; Paridon, Stephen M.; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBACKGROUND: The Fontan operation results in a circulation that is dependent on low pulmonary vascular resistance to maintain an adequate cardiac output. Medical therapies that lower pulmonary vascular resistance may augment cardiac output and improve long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This phase I/II clinical trial conducted by the Pediatric Heart Network was designed to evaluate short-term safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of udenafil in adolescents following Fontan. METHODS: A 5-day dose-escalation trial was conducted in five study cohorts of six subjects each (37.5, 87.5, and 125 mg daily, 37.5 and 87.5 mg by mouth twice daily). A control cohort with 6 subjects underwent exercise testing only. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded, PK samples were collected on study days six through eight, and clinical testing was performed at baseline and day five. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 36 subjects; mean age 15.8 years (58% male). There were no significant differences in subject characteristics between cohorts. No drug-related serious AEs were reported during the study period; 24 subjects had AEs possibly or probably related to study drug. Headache was the most common AE, occurring in 20 of 30 subjects. The 87.5 mg bid cohort was well tolerated, achieved the highest maximal concentration (506 ng/mL) and the highest average concentration over the dosing interval (279 ng/mL), and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. Exercise performance did not improve in any of the dosing cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Udenafil was well-tolerated at all dosing levels. The 87.5 mg bid cohort achieved the highest plasma drug level and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. These data suggest that the 87.5 mg bid regimen may be the most appropriate for a Phase III clinical trial.Item The Effect of Udenafil on Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Adolescents With the Fontan Circulation(Elsevier, 2024) Edelson, Jonathan B.; Zak, Victor; Goldberg, David; Fleming, Greg; Mackie, Andrew S.; Patel, Jyoti K.; Files, Matthew; Downing, Tacy; Richmond, Marc; Acheampong, Ben; Cartoski, Mark; Detterich, Jon; McCrindle, Brian; McHugh, Kimberly; Hansen, Jesse E.; Wagner, Jonathan; Di Maria, Michael; Weingarten, Angela; Nowlen, Todd; Yoon, Ja Kyoung; Kim, Gi Beom; Williams, Richard; Whitehill, Robert; Kirkpatrick, Edward; Yin, Suellen; Ermis, Peter; Lubert, Adam M.; Stylianou, Mario; Freemon, D'Andrea; Hu, Chenwei; Garuba, Olukayode D.; Frommelt, Peter; Goldstein, Bryan H.; Paridon, Stephen; Garg, Ruchira; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators; Pediatrics, School of MedicineThe Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal (FUEL) trial showed that treatment with udenafil was associated with improved exercise performance at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold in children with Fontan physiology. However, it is not known how the initiation of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy affects heart rate and blood pressure in this population. These data may help inform patient selection and monitoring after the initiation of udenafil therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of udenafil on vital signs in the cohort of patients enrolled in the FUEL trial. This international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of udenafil included adolescents with single ventricle congenital heart disease who had undergone Fontan palliation. Changes in vital signs (heart rate [HR], systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) were compared both to subject baseline and between the treatment and the placebo groups. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to evaluate changes in vital signs for prespecified subpopulations believed to be most sensitive to udenafil initiation. Baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment and placebo cohorts (n = 200 for each). The groups demonstrated a decrease in HR, SBP, and DBP 2 hours after drug/placebo administration, except SBP in the placebo group. There was an increase in SBP from baseline to after 6-min walk test in the treatment and placebo groups, and the treatment group showed an increase in HR (87.4 ± 15.0 to 93.1 ± 19.4 beats/min, p <0.01) after exercise. When comparing changes from baseline to the 26-week study visit, small decreases in both SBP (-1.9 ± 12.3 mm Hg, p = 0.03) and DBP (-3.0 ± 9.6 mm Hg, p <0.01) were seen in the treatment group. There were no clinically significant differences between treatment and placebo group in change in HR or blood pressure in the youngest age quartile, lightest weight quartile, or those on afterload-reducing agents. In conclusion, initiation of treatment with udenafil in patients with Fontan circulation was not associated with clinically significant changes in vital signs, implying that for patients similar to those enrolled in the FUEL trial, udenafil can be started without the requirement for additional monitoring after initial administration.