Browsing by Author "Patel, Rena C."
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Contraception use and HIV outcomes among women initiating dolutegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy in Kenya: a retrospective cohort study(Wiley, 2022) Humphrey, John M.; Omodi, Victor; Bernard, Caitlin; Maina, Mercy; Thorne, Julie; Mwangi, Ann; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Patel, Rena C.; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction: The rollout of dolutegravir (DTG) in low- and middle-income countries was disrupted by a potential association reported with periconceptional DTG exposure among women living with HIV (WLHIV) and infant neural tube defects. This prompted countries to issue interim guidance limiting DTG use among women of reproductive potential to those on effective contraception. Data to understand the potential impact of such guidance on WLHIV are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of WLHIV 15-49 years initiating DTG-containing antiretroviral treatment (ART) in Kenya from 2017 to 2020. We determined baseline effective (oral, injectable or lactational amenorrhea) and very effective (implant, intrauterine device or female sterilization) contraception use among women who initiated DTG before (Group 1) or during (Group 2) the interim guideline period. We defined incident contraception use in each group as the number of contraceptive methods initiated ≤180 days post-guideline (Group 1) or post-DTG initiation (Group 2). We determined the proportions of all women who switched from DTG- to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)- (efavirenz or nevirapine) containing ART ≤12 months post-DTG initiation, compared their viral suppression (<1000 copies/ml) and conducted multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with switching from DTG to NNRTI-containing ART. Results: Among 5155 WLHIV in the analysis (median age 43 years), 89% initiated DTG after transitioning from an NNRTI. Baseline effective and very effective contraception use, respectively, by the group were: Group 1 (12% and 13%) and Group 2 (41% and 35%). Incident contraception use in each group was <5%. Overall, 498 (10%) women switched from DTG to an NNRTI. Viral suppression among those remaining on DTG versus switched to NNRTI was 95% and 96%, respectively (p = 0.63). In multivariable analysis, incident effective and very effective contraception use was not associated with switching. Conclusions: Baseline, but not incident, effective contraception use was higher during the interim guideline period compared to before it, suggesting women already using effective contraception were preferentially selected to initiate DTG after the guideline was released. These findings reveal challenges in the implementation of policy which ties antiretroviral access to contraceptive use. Future guidance should capture nuances of contraception decision-making and support women's agency to make informed decisions.Item Contraceptive implant use duration is not associated with breakthrough pregnancy among women living with HIV and using efavirenz: a retrospective, longitudinal analysis(Wiley, 2022) Stalter, Randy M.; Amorim, Gustavo; Mocello, A. Rain; Jakait, Beatrice; Shepherd, Bryan E.; Musick, Beverly; Bernard, Caitlin; Bukusi, Elizabeth A.; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Cohen, Craig R.; Yiannoutsos, Constantin T.; Patel, Rena C.; Implant/Efavirenz Study Group; East Africa IeDEA regional consortium; Biostatistics, School of Public HealthIntroduction: Contraceptive implants containing etonogestrel and levonorgestrel have emerged as popular contraceptive options among women in areas of high HIV burden in sub-Saharan Africa. However, recent pharmacokinetic data have shown drug-drug interactions between implants and efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART), reducing the effectiveness of the implants. Here, we evaluated pregnancy incidence in 6-month intervals following implant initiation among women using efavirenz and contraceptive implants to assess whether the risk of breakthrough pregnancy is higher after specific periods of implant use. Methods: We used data from a retrospective longitudinal analysis of women living with HIV ages 18-45 years in western Kenya who attended HIV-care facilities between 2011 and 2015. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compute hazard ratios (HRs) for breakthrough pregnancy by implant type and ART regimen. Depending on the model, we adjusted for socio-demographic and clinical factors, programme, site and interaction between calendar time and ART regimen. We utilized inverse probability weights (IPWs) to account for three sampling phases (electronic medical record [EMR], chart review and phone interview) and calculated overall parameter estimates. Results: Women contributed 14,768 woman-years from the largest sampling phase (EMR). The median age was 31 years. Women used etonogestrel implants for 26-69% of the time and levonorgestrel implants for 7-31% of the time, depending on the sampling phase. Women used efavirenz, nevirapine or no ART for 27-33%, 40-46% and 15-26% of follow-ups, respectively. When combining sampling phases, there was little evidence to suggest that the relative hazard of pregnancy among efavirenz-containing ART users relative to nevirapine-containing ART changed with length of time on implants: IPW-adjusted HR of 3.1 (CI: [1.5; 6.4]) at 12 months, 3.4 (CI: [1.8; 6.3]) at 24 months, 3.8 (CI: [1.9; 7.7]) at 36 months and 4.2 (CI: [1.6; 11.1]) at 48 months (interaction p-value = 0.88). Similarly, no significant change in HRs over time was found when comparing women not using ART to nevirapine-containing ART users (interaction p-value = 0.49). Conclusions: We did not find evidence to suggest implants being more fallible from drug-drug interactions with efavirenz at later time intervals of implant use. Thus, we would not recommend shortening the duration of implant use or replacing implants sooner when concomitantly used with efavirenz.Item Disparities in Dolutegravir Uptake Affecting Females of Reproductive Age With HIV in Low- and Middle-Income Countries After Initial Concerns About Teratogenicity : An Observational Study(American College of Physicians, 2022) Romo, Matthew L.; Patel, Rena C.; Edwards, Jessie K.; Humphrey, John M.; Musick, Beverly S.; Bernard, Caitlin; Maina, Mercy W.; Brazier, Ellen; Castelnuovo, Barbara; Penner, Jeremy; Wyka, Katarzyna; Wagner Cardoso, Sandra; Ly, Penh Sun; Kunzekwenyika, Cordelia; Cortés, Claudia P.; Panczak, Radoslaw; Kelvin, Elizabeth A.; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara K.; Nash, Denis; International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA); Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: The transition to dolutegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) was complicated by an initial safety signal in May 2018 suggesting that exposure to dolutegravir at conception was possibly associated with infant neural tube defects. On the basis of additional evidence, in July 2019, the World Health Organization recommended dolutegravir for all adults and adolescents living with HIV. Objective: To describe dolutegravir uptake and disparities by sex and age group in LMICs. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: 87 sites that began using dolutegravir in 11 LMICs in the Asia-Pacific; Caribbean, Central and South America network for HIV epidemiology (CCASAnet); and sub-Saharan African regions of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium. Patients: 134 672 patients aged 16 years or older who received HIV care from January 2017 through March 2020. Measurements: Sex, age group, and dolutegravir uptake (that is, newly initiating ART with dolutegravir or switching to dolutegravir from another regimen). Results: Differences in dolutegravir uptake among females of reproductive age (16 to 49 years) emerged after the safety signal. By the end of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of dolutegravir uptake among females 16 to 49 years old was 29.4% (95% CI, 29.0% to 29.7%) compared with 57.7% (CI, 57.2% to 58.3%) among males 16 to 49 years old. This disparity was greater in countries that began implementing dolutegravir before the safety signal and initially had highly restrictive policies versus countries with a later rollout. Dolutegravir uptake was similar among females and males aged 50 years or older. Limitation: Follow-up was limited to 6 to 8 months after international guidelines recommended expanding access to dolutegravir. Conclusion: Substantial disparities in dolutegravir uptake affecting females of reproductive age through early 2020 are documented. Although this disparity was anticipated because of country-level restrictions on access, the results highlight its extent and initial persistence.Item Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to HIV and reproductive health care among women living with HIV (WLHIV) in Western Kenya: A mixed methods analysis(Frontiers Media, 2022-12-12) Bernard, Caitlin; Hassan, Shukri A.; Humphrey, John; Thorne, Julie; Maina, Mercy; Jakait, Beatrice; Brown, Evelyn; Yongo, Nashon; Kerich, Caroline; Changwony, Sammy; Qian, Shirley Rui W.; Scallon, Andrea J.; Komanapalli, Sarah A.; Enan, Leslie A.; Oyaro, Patrick; Abuogi, Lisa L.; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Patel, Rena C.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of MedicineIntroduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted access to health services. Our objective was to understand the pandemic's impact on access to HIV, pregnancy, and family planning (FP) care among women living with HIV (WLHIV). Methods: Data were collected after June 2020, when questions about the pandemic were added to two ongoing mixed methods studies using telephone surveys and in-depth interviews among WLHIV in western Kenya. The Chaguo Langu (CL) study includes primarily non-pregnant WLHIV receiving HIV care at 55 facilities supported by AMPATH and the Opt4Mamas study includes pregnant WLHIV receiving antenatal care at five facilities supported by FACES. Our outcomes were self-reported increased difficulty refilling medication, accessing care, and managing FP during the pandemic. We summarized descriptive data and utilized multivariable logistic regression to evaluate predictors of difficulty refilling medication and accessing care. We qualitatively analyzed the interviews using inductive coding with thematic analysis. Results: We analyzed 1,402 surveys and 15 in-depth interviews. Many (32%) CL participants reported greater difficulty refilling medications and a minority (14%) reported greater difficulty accessing HIV care during the pandemic. Most (99%) Opt4Mamas participants reported no difficulty refilling medications or accessing HIV/pregnancy care. Among the CL participants, older women were less likely (aOR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) and women with more children were more likely (aOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00-1.28) to report difficulty refilling medications. Only 2% of CL participants reported greater difficulty managing FP and most (95%) reported no change in likelihood of using FP or desire to get pregnant. Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: (1) adverse organizational/economic implications of the pandemic, (2) increased importance of pregnancy prevention during the pandemic, and (3) fear of contracting COVID-19. Discussion: The two unique participant groups included in our study encountered overlapping problems during the COVID-19 epidemic. Access to HIV services and antiretrovirals was interrupted for a large proportion of non-pregnant WLHIV in western Kenya, but access to pregnancy/family planning care was less affected in our cohort. Innovative solutions are needed to ensure HIV and reproductive health outcomes do not worsen during the ongoing pandemic.Item Predicting neurodevelopmental risk in children born to mothers living with HIV in Kenya: protocol for a prospective cohort study (Tabiri Study)(BMJ, 2022-04-04) Oyungu, Eren; El Kebbi, Ola; Vreeman, Rachel; Nyandiko, Winstone; Monahan, Patrick O.; Tu, Wanzhu; Khaitan, Alka; Desta, Zeruesenay; Slogrove, Amy L.; Humphrey, John M.; Were, Edwin; Patel, Rena C.; Carlucci, James G.; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; McHenry, Megan S.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineIntroduction: For the growing number of children with in utero and postpartum exposure to HIV and/or antiretrovirals, it is unclear which exposures or risk factors play a significant role in predicting worse neurodevelopmental outcomes. This protocol describes a prospective longitudinal cohort study of infants born to mothers living with HIV and those born to mothers without HIV. We will determine which risk factors are most predictive of child neurodevelopment at 24 months. We aim to create a risk assessment tool to help predict which children are at risk for worse neurodevelopment outcomes. Methods and analysis: This study leverages an existing Kenyan cohort to prospectively enrol 500 children born to mothers living with HIV and 500 to those without HIV (n=1000 total) and follow them from birth to age 24 months. The following factors will be measured every 6 months: infectious morbidity and biological/sociodemographic/psychosocial risk factors. We will compare these factors between the two groups. We will then measure and compare neurodevelopment within children in both groups at 24 months of age using the Child Behaviour Checklist and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition. Finally, we will use generalised linear mixed modelling to quantify associations with neurodevelopment and create a risk assessment tool for children ≤24 months. Ethics and dissemination: The study is approved by the Moi University's Institutional Research and Ethics Committee (IREC/2021/55; Approval #0003892), Kenya's National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI, Reference #700244) and Indiana University's Institutional Review Board (IRB Protocol #110990). This study carries minimal risk to the children and their mothers, and all mothers will provide written consent for participation in the study. Results will be disseminated to maternal child health clinics within Uasin Gishu County, Kenya and via papers submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presentation at international conferences.Item Preferences for Multipurpose Technology and Non-oral Methods of Antiretroviral Therapy Among Women Living With HIV in Western Kenya: A Survey Study(Frontiers Media, 2022-05-19) Bernard, Caitlin; Jakait, Beatrice; Fadel, William F.; Mocello, A. Rain; Onono, Maricianah A.; Bukusi, Elizabeth A.; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara K.; Cohen, Craig R.; Patel, Rena C.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of MedicineIntroduction: Understanding interests in and preferences for multipurpose technology (MPT) for the co-administration of contraception and antiretroviral therapy (ART) and alternative, non-oral ART methods among women living with HIV (WLHIV) is vital to successful implementation of future treatment options, such as long-acting injectable ART. Methods: Between May 2016 and March 2017 we conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey of 1,132 WLHIV of reproductive potential with prior experience using intermediate- or long-acting contraceptive methods in western Kenya. We present descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression to evaluate predictors of interest in specific MPT and non-oral ART methods. Results: Two-thirds (67%) reported interest in MPT, with the most common reason for interest being ease of using a single medication for both purposes of HIV treatment and pregnancy prevention (26%). Main reasons for lack of interest in MPT were need to stop/not use contraception while continuing ART (21%) and risk of side effects (16%). Important characteristics of MPT were effectiveness for pregnancy prevention (26%) and HIV treatment (24%) and less than daily dosing (19%). Important characteristics of non-oral ART methods were less than daily dosing (47%), saving time accessing ART (16%), and effectiveness of HIV treatment (15%). The leading preferred methods for both MPT and non-oral ART were injectables (50 and 54%) and implants (32 and 31%). Prior use of a contraceptive implant or injectable predicted interest in similar methods for both MPT and non-oral ART methods, while this relationship did not appear to vary between younger vs. older WLHIV. Discussion: Most WLHIV in western Kenya are interested in MPT for HIV treatment and contraception. Prior exposure to contraceptive implants or injectables appears to predict interest in similar methods of MPT and non-oral ART. Developers of MPT and non-oral ART methods should strongly consider WLHIV's preferences, including their changing reproductive desires.Item Pregnancies among women living with HIV using contraceptives and antiretroviral therapy in western Kenya: a retrospective, cohort study(BMC, 2021-08-13) Patel, Rena C.; Amorim, Gustavo; Jakait, Beatrice; Shepherd, Bryan E.; Mocello, A. Rain; Musick, Beverly; Bernard, Caitlin; Onono, Maricianah; Bukusi, Elizabeth A.; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Cohen, Craig R.; Yiannoutsos, Constantin T.; Biostatistics, School of Public HealthBackground: Preventing unintended pregnancies is paramount for women living with HIV (WLHIV). Previous studies have suggested that efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces contraceptive effectiveness of implants, but there are uncertainties regarding the quality of the electronic medical record (EMR) data used in these prior studies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of EMR data from 2011 to 2015 among WLHIV of reproductive age accessing HIV care in public facilities in western Kenya. We validated a large subsample of records with manual chart review and telephone interviews. We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) with Poisson regression accounting for the validation sampling using inverse probability weighting and generalized raking. Results: A total of 85,324 women contributed a total of 170,845 women-years (w-y) of observation time; a subset of 5080 women had their charts reviewed, and 1285 underwent interviews. Among implant users, the aIRR of pregnancy for efavirenz- vs. nevirapine-containing ART was 1.9 (95% CI 1.6, 2.4) using EMR data only and 3.2 (95% CI 1.8, 5.7) when additionally using both chart review and interview validated data. Among efavirenz users, the aIRR of pregnancy for depomedroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) vs. implant use was 1.8 (95% CI 1.5, 2.1) in EMR only and 2.4 (95% CI 1.0, 6.1) using validated data. Conclusion: Pregnancy rates are higher when contraceptive implants are concomitantly used with efavirenz-containing ART, though rates were similar to leading alternative contraceptive methods such as DMPA. Our data provides policymakers, program staff, and WLHIV greater confidence in guiding their decision-making around contraceptive and ART options. Our novel, 3-phase validation sampling provides an innovative tool for using routine EMR data to improve the robustness of data quality.