Browsing by Author "Patel, Parth M."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Congenital Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: Encouraging Mid-term Outcome
    (Springer, 2015-08) Charlagorla, Pradeepkumar; Becerra, David; Patel, Parth M.; Hoyer, Mark; Darragh, Robert K.; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of Medicine
    Congenital pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare entity with limited outcome literature. Multiple interventional approaches have evolved including surgical and catheterization techniques. Our objective is to report our center experience and to compare short-term and mid-term outcomes among these therapeutic modalities. Retrospective study on 23 patients (n = 23) with PVS that required intervention over the last 13 years (2000–2013). Patients were divided into three groups based on type of initial intervention. Of these, 10 (43.5 %) had balloon angioplasty, 3 (13.0 %) had surgical dilation, and 10 (43.5 %) had surgical marsupialization. Mortality and number of re-interventions were our primary outcomes. Mean age at diagnosis was 10.9 ± 18.4 months. Mean age at initial intervention was 14.5 ± 18.0 months. Mean pre- and post-initial intervention PVS gradients were 9.2 ± 3.4 and 3.4 ± 2.2 mmHg, respectively. Mean survival time and re-intervention-free survival time were 4.8 ± 4.0 and 2.8 ± 3.4 years. No statistical significance was found between the interventions with respect to survival time (p = 0.52) and re-intervention free time (p = 0.78). High initial pre- and post-intervention gradients were significantly associated with re-intervention-free survival (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). Patients with bilateral disease have increased mortality (p = 0.01) and decreased 5-year survival (p = 0.009) compared to patients with unilateral disease irrespective of type of intervention. No statistically significant difference in mortality or re-intervention rate was present among these different therapeutic modalities. This study has the longest follow-up so far reported in the current literature (58 months) with overall survival of 78 %.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Perioperative and long-term outcomes of Ross versus mechanical aortic valve replacement
    (Wiley, 2022) Wenos, Chelsea D.; Herrmann, Jeremy L.; Timsina, Lava R.; Patel, Parth M.; Fehrenbacher, John W.; Brown, John W.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: The ideal aortic valve replacement strategy in young- and middle-aged adults remains up for debate. Clinical practice guidelines recommend mechanical prostheses for most patients less than 50 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement. However, risks of major hemorrhage and thromboembolism associated with long-term anticoagulation may make the pulmonary autograft technique, or Ross procedure, a preferred approach in select patients. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for patients 18-50 years of age who underwent either the Ross procedure or mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR) between January 2000 and December 2016 at a single institution. Propensity score matching was performed and yielded 32 well-matched pairs from a total of 216 eligible patients. Results: Demographic and preoperative characteristics were similar between the two groups. Median follow-up was 7.3 and 6.9 years for Ross and mAVR, respectively. There were no early mortalities in either group and no statistically significant differences were observed with respect to perioperative outcomes or complications. Major hemorrhage and stroke events were significantly more frequent in the mAVR population (p < .01). Overall survival (p = .93), freedom from reintervention and valve dysfunction free survival (p = .91) were equivalent. Conclusions: In this mid-term propensity score-matched analysis, the Ross procedure offers similar perioperative outcomes, freedom from reintervention or valve dysfunction as well as overall survival compared to traditional mAVR but without the morbidity associated with long-term anticoagulation. At specialized centers with sufficient expertize, the Ross procedure should be strongly considered in select patients requiring aortic valve replacement.