Browsing by Author "Pastore, Yves D."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical features and outcomes of patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study
    (Elsevier, 2020-03) Myers, Kasiani C.; Furutani, Elissa; Weller, Edie; Siegele, Bradford; Galvin, Ashley; Arsenault, Valerie; Alter, Blanche P.; Boulad, Farid; Bueso-Ramos, Carlos; Burroughs, Lauri; Castillo, Paul; Connelly, James; Davies, Stella M.; DiNardo, Courtney D.; Hanif, Iftikhar; Ho, Richard H.; Karras, Nicole; Manalang, Michelle; McReynolds, Lisa J.; Nakano, Taizo A.; Nalepa, Grzegorz; Norkin, Maxim; Oberley, Matthew J.; Orgel, Etan; Pastore, Yves D.; Rosenthal, Joseph; Walkovich, Kelly; Larson, Jordan; Malsch, Maggie; Elghetany, M. Tarek; Fleming, Mark D.; Shimamura, Akiko; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Data to inform surveillance and treatment for leukaemia predisposition syndromes are scarce and recommendations are largely based on expert opinion. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, an inherited bone marrow failure disorder with high risk of developing myeloid malignancies. Methods: We did a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study in collaboration with the North American Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome Registry. We reviewed patient medical records from 17 centres in the USA and Canada. Patients with a genetic (biallelic mutations in the SBDS gene) or clinical diagnosis (cytopenias and pancreatic dysfunction) of Shwachman-Diamond syndrome who developed myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia were eligible without additional restriction. Medical records were reviewed between March 1, 2001, and Oct 5, 2017. Masked central review of bone marrow pathology was done if available to confirm leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome diagnosis. We describe the clinical features and overall survival of these patients. Findings: We initially identified 37 patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia. 27 patients had samples available for central pathology review and were reclassified accordingly (central diagnosis concurred with local in 15 [56%] cases), 10 had no samples available and were classified based on the local review data, and 1 patient was excluded at this stage as not eligible. 36 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 10 (28%) initially presented with acute myeloid leukaemia and 26 (72%) initially presented with myelodysplastic syndrome. With a median follow-up of 4·9 years (IQR 3·9-8·4), median overall survival for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome was 7·7 years (95% CI 0·8-not reached) and 0·99 years (95% CI 0·2-2·4) for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Overall survival at 3 years was 11% (95% CI 1-39) for patients with leukaemia and 51% (29-68) for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Management and surveillance were variable. 18 (69%) of 26 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome received upfront therapy (14 haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and 4 chemotherapy), 4 (15%) patients received no treatment, 2 (8%) had unavailable data, and 2 (8%) progressed to acute myeloid leukaemia before receiving treatment. 12 patients received treatment for acute myeloid leukaemia-including the two patients initially diagnosed with myelodysplastic who progressed- two (16%) received HSCT as initial therapy and ten (83%) received chemotherapy with intent to proceed with HSCT. 33 (92%) of 36 patients (eight of ten with leukaemia and 25 of 26 with myelodysplastic syndrome) were known to have Shwachman-Diamond syndrome before development of a myeloid malignancy and could have been monitored with bone marrow surveillance. Bone marrow surveillance before myeloid malignancy diagnosis was done in three (33%) of nine patients with leukaemia for whom surveillance status was confirmed and 11 (46%) of 24 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Patients monitored had a 3-year overall survival of 62% (95% CI 32-82; n=14) compared with 28% (95% CI 10-50; n=19; p=0·13) without surveillance. Six (40%) of 15 patients with available longitudinal data developed myelodysplastic syndrome in the setting of stable blood counts. Interpretation: Our results suggest that prognosis is poor for patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia owing to both therapy-resistant disease and treatment-related toxicities. Improved surveillance algorithms and risk stratification tools, studies of clonal evolution, and prospective trials are needed to inform effective prevention and treatment strategies for leukaemia predisposition in patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Physician decision making in selection of second-line treatments in immune thrombocytopenia in children.
    (Wiley, 2018-07) Grace, Rachael F.; Despotovic, Jenny M.; Bennett, Carolyn M.; Bussel, James B.; Neier, Michelle; Neunert, Cindy; Crary, Shelley E.; Pastore, Yves D.; Klaassen, Robert J.; Rothman, Jennifer A.; Hege, Kerry; Breakey, Vicky R.; Rose, Melissa J.; Shimano, Kristin A.; Buchanan, George R.; Geddis, Amy; Haley, Kristina M.; Lorenzana, Adonis; Thompson, Alexis; Jeng, Michael; Neufeld, Ellis J.; Brown, Travis; Forbes, Peter W.; Lambert, Michele P.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune bleeding disorder which presents with isolated thrombocytopenia and risk of hemorrhage. While most children with ITP promptly recover with or without drug therapy, ITP is persistent or chronic in others. When needed, how to select second-line therapies is not clear. ICON1, conducted within the Pediatric ITP Consortium of North America (ICON), is a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of 120 children from 21 centers starting second-line treatments for ITP which examined treatment decisions. Treating physicians reported reasons for selecting therapies, ranking the top three. In a propensity weighted model, the most important factors were patient/parental preference (53%) and treatment-related factors: side effect profile (58%), long-term toxicity (54%), ease of administration (46%), possibility of remission (45%), and perceived efficacy (30%). Physician, health system, and clinical factors rarely influenced decision-making. Patient/parent preferences were selected as reasons more often in chronic ITP (85.7%) than in newly diagnosed (0%) or persistent ITP (14.3%, P = .003). Splenectomy and rituximab were chosen for the possibility of inducing long-term remission (P < .001). Oral agents, such as eltrombopag and immunosuppressants, were chosen for ease of administration and expected adherence (P < .001). Physicians chose rituximab in patients with lower expected adherence (P = .017). Treatment choice showed some physician and treatment center bias. This study illustrates the complexity and many factors involved in decision-making in selecting second-line ITP treatments, given the absence of comparative trials. It highlights shared decision-making and the need for well-conducted, comparative effectiveness studies to allow for informed discussion between patients and clinicians.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Second-line treatments in children with immune thrombocytopenia: Effect on platelet count and patient-centered outcomes
    (Wiley, 2019-04-03) Grace, Rachael F.; Shimano, Kristin A.; Bhat, Rukhmi; Neunert, Cindy; Bussel, James B.; Klaassen, Robert J.; Lambert, Michele P.; Rothman, Jennifer A.; Breakey, Vicky R.; Hege, Kerry; Bennett, Carolyn M.; Rose, Melissa J.; Haley, Kristina M.; Buchanan, George R.; Geddis, Amy; Lorenzana, Adonis; Jeng, Michael; Pastore, Yves D.; Crary, Shelley E.; Neier, Michelle; Neufeld, Ellis J.; Neu, Nolan; Forbes, Peter W.; Despotovic, Jenny M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with isolated thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic risk. While many children with ITP can be safely observed, treatments are often needed for various reasons, including to decrease bleeding or improve health related quality of life (HRQoL). There are a number of available second-line treatments, including rituximab, thrombopoietin-receptor agonists, oral immunosuppressive agents, and splenectomy, but data comparing treatment outcomes are lacking. ICON1 is a prospective, multi-center, observational study of 120 children starting second-line treatments for ITP designed to compare treatment outcomes including platelet count, bleeding, and HRQoL utilizing the Kids ITP Tool (KIT). While all treatments resulted in increased platelet counts, romiplostim had the most pronounced effect at 6 months (p=0.04). Only patients on romiplostim and rituximab had a significant reduction in both skin-related (84% to 48%, p=0.01 and 81% to 43%, p=0.004) and non-skin-related bleeding symptoms (58% to 14%, p=0.0001 and 54% to 17%, p=0.0006) after 1 month of treatment. HRQoL significantly improved on all treatments. However, only patients treated with eltrombopag had a median improvement in KIT scores at 1 month that met the minimal important difference (MID). Bleeding, platelet count, and HRQoL improved in each treatment group, but the extent and timing of the effect varied among treatments. These results are hypothesis generating and help to improve our understanding of the effect of each treatment on specific patient outcomes. Combined with future randomized trials, these findings will help clinicians select the optimal second-line treatment for an individual child with ITP.