Browsing by Author "Pastor, Richard W."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed
    (American Chemical Society, 2024) Hwang, Wonmuk; Austin, Steven L.; Blondel, Arnaud; Boittier, Eric D.; Boresch, Stefan; Buck, Matthias; Buckner, Joshua; Caflisch, Amedeo; Chang, Hao-Ting; Cheng, Xi; Choi, Yeol Kyo; Chu, Jhih-Wei; Crowley, Michael F.; Cui, Qiang; Damjanovic, Ana; Deng, Yuqing; Devereux, Mike; Ding, Xinqiang; Feig, Michael F.; Gao, Jiali; Glowacki, David R.; Gonzales, James E., II; Hamaneh, Mehdi Bagerhi; Harder, Edward D.; Hayes, Ryan L.; Huang, Jing; Huang, Yandong; Hudson, Phillip S.; Im, Wonpil; Islam, Shahidul M.; Jiang, Wei; Jones, Michael R.; Käser, Silvan; Kearns, Fiona L.; Kern, Nathan R.; Klauda, Jeffery B.; Lazaridis, Themis; Lee, Jinhyuk; Lemkul, Justin A.; Liu, Xiaorong; Luo, Yun; MacKerell, Alexander D., Jr.; Major, Dan T.; Meuwly, Markus; Nam, Kwangho; Nilsson, Lennart; Ovchinnikov, Victor; Paci, Emanuele; Park, Soohyung; Pastor, Richard W.; Pittman, Amanda R.; Post, Carol Beth; Prasad, Samarjeet; Pu, Jingzhi; Qi, Yifei; Rathinavelan, Thenmalarchelvi; Roe, Daniel R.; Roux, Benoit; Rowley, Christopher N.; Shen, Jana; Simmonett, Andrew C.; Sodt, Alexander J.; Töpfer, Kai; Upadhyay, Meenu; van der Vaart, Arjan; Vazquez-Salazar, Luis Itza; Venable, Richard M.; Warrensford, Luke C.; Woodcock, H. Lee; Wu, Yujin; Brooks, Charles L., III; Brooks, Bernard R.; Karplus, Martin; Chemistry and Chemical Biology, School of Science
    Since its inception nearly a half century ago, CHARMM has been playing a central role in computational biochemistry and biophysics. Commensurate with the developments in experimental research and advances in computer hardware, the range of methods and applicability of CHARMM have also grown. This review summarizes major developments that occurred after 2009 when the last review of CHARMM was published. They include the following: new faster simulation engines, accessible user interfaces for convenient workflows, and a vast array of simulation and analysis methods that encompass quantum mechanical, atomistic, and coarse-grained levels, as well as extensive coverage of force fields. In addition to providing the current snapshot of the CHARMM development, this review may serve as a starting point for exploring relevant theories and computational methods for tackling contemporary and emerging problems in biomolecular systems. CHARMM is freely available for academic and nonprofit research at https://academiccharmm.org/program.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Molecular Structure of Sphingomyelin in Fluid Phase Bilayers Determined by the Joint Analysis of Small-Angle Neutron and X-ray Scattering Data
    (American Chemical Society, 2020-06-25) Doktorova, Milka; Kučerka, Norbert; Kinnun, Jacob J.; Pan, Jianjun; Marquardt, Drew; Scott, Haden L.; Venable, Richard M.; Pastor, Richard W.; Wassall, Stephen R.; Katsaras, John; Heberle, Frederick A.; Physics, School of Science
    We have determined the fluid bilayer structure of palmitoyl sphingomyelin (PSM) and stearoyl sphingomyelin (SSM) by simultaneously analyzing small-angle neutron and X-ray scattering data. Using a newly developed scattering density profile (SDP) model for sphingomyelin lipids, we report structural parameters including the area per lipid, total bilayer thickness, and hydrocarbon thickness, in addition to lipid volumes determined by densitometry. Unconstrained all-atom simulations of PSM bilayers at 55 °C using the C36 CHARMM force field produced a lipid area of 56 Å2, a value that is 10% lower than the one determined experimentally by SDP analysis (61.9 Å2). Furthermore, scattering form factors calculated from the unconstrained simulations were in poor agreement with experimental form factors, even though segmental order parameter (SCD) profiles calculated from the simulations were in relatively good agreement with SCD profiles obtained from NMR experiments. Conversely, constrained area simulations at 61.9 Å2 resulted in good agreement between the simulation and experimental scattering form factors, but not with SCD profiles from NMR. We discuss possible reasons for the discrepancies between these two types of data that are frequently used as validation metrics for molecular dynamics force fields.