Browsing by Author "Paolillo, Emily W."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A harmonized memory composite score for cross‐cohort Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia research: development and validation
    (Wiley, 2025-01-03) Sanderson-Cimino, Mark E.; Gross, Alden L.; Gaynor, Leslie S.; Paolillo, Emily W.; Casaletto, Kaitlin B.; Chatterjee, Ankita; Albert, Marilyn S.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Boersema, Brooke; Boxer, Adam L.; Boeve, Brad F.; Clark, Lindsay R.; La Joie, Renaud; Eloyan, Ani; Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah; Gonzales, Mitzi M.; Hammers, Dustin B.; Wise, Amy B.; Cobigo, Yann; Yballa, Claire; Schonhaut, Daniel R.; Hampstead, Benjamin M.; Mechanic-Hamilton, Dawn; Miller, Bruce L.; Rabinovici, Gil D.; Rascovsky, Katya; Ringman, John M.; Rosen, Howard J.; Ryman, Sephira; Salmon, David P.; Smith, Glenn E.; Decarli, Charles; Kramer, Joel H.; Staffaroni, Adam M.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: The Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological battery, administered across Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADC), includes memory tests but lacks a list‐learning paradigm. ADCs often supplement the UDS with their own preferred list‐learning task. Given the importance of list‐learning for characterizing memory, we aimed to develop a harmonized memory score that incorporates UDS memory tests while allowing centers to contribute differing list‐learning tasks. Method: We applied item‐banking confirmatory factor analysis to develop a composite memory score in 5,287 participants (mean age 67.1; SD = 12.2) recruited through 18 ADCs and four consortia (DiverseVCID, MarkVCID, ALLFTD, LEADS) who completed UDS memory tasks (used as linking‐items) and one of five list‐learning tasks. All analyses used linear regression. We tested whether memory scores were affected by which list‐learning task was administered. To assess construct validity, we tested associations of memory scores with demographics, disease severity (CDR Box Score), an independent memory task (TabCAT Favorites, n = 675), and hippocampal volume (n = 811). We compared performances between cognitively unimpaired (n = 279), AD‐biomarker+ MCI (n = 26), and AD‐biomarker+ dementia (n = 98). In a subsample with amyloid‐ and tau‐PET (n = 49), we compared memory scores from participants with positive vs negative scans determined using established quantitative cutoffs. Result: Model fit indices were excellent (e.g., CFI = 0.998) and factor loadings were strong (0.43‐0.93). Differences in list‐learning task had a negligible effect on scores (average Cohen’s d = 0.11). Higher memory scores were significantly (p’s<.001) correlated with younger age (β = ‐0.18), lower CDR Box Scores (β = ‐0.63), female sex (β = 0.12), higher education (β = 0.19), larger hippocampal volume (β = 0.42), and an independent memory task (β = 0.71, p<0.001). The memory composite declined in a stepwise fashion by diagnosis (cognitively unimpaired>MCI>AD dementia, p<0.001). On average, amyloid‐PET positivity was associated with lower composite scores, but was not statistically significant (β = ‐0.34; p = 0.25; d = 0.40). Tau‐PET positivity was associated with worse performance, demonstrating a large effect size (β = ‐0.75; p<0.002; d = 0.91). Conclusion: The harmonized memory score developed in a large national sample was stable regardless of contributing list‐learning task and its validity for cross‐cohort ADRD research is supported by expected associations with demographics, clinical measures, and Alzheimer’s biomarkers. A processing script will be made available to enhance cross‐cohort ADRD research.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development and validation of a harmonized memory score for multicenter Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research
    (medRxiv, 2025-04-03) Sanderson-Cimino, Mark; Gross, Alden L.; Gaynor, Leslie S.; Paolillo, Emily W.; Saloner, Rowan; Albert, Marilyn S.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Boersema, Brooke; Boxer, Adam L.; Boeve, Bradley F.; Casaletto, Kaitlin B.; Hallgarth, Savannah R.; Diaz, Valentina E.; Clark, Lindsay R.; Maillard, Pauline; Eloyan, Ani; Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah; Gonzales, Mitzi M.; Hammers, Dustin B.; La Joie, Renaud; Cobigo, Yann; Wolf, Amy; Hampstead, Benjamin M.; Mechanic-Hamilton, Dawn; Miller, Bruce L.; Rabinovici, Gil D.; Ringman, John M.; Rosen, Howie J.; Ryman, Sephira G.; Prestopnik, Jillian L.; Salmon, David P.; Smith, Glenn E.; DeCarli, Charles; Rajan, Kumar B.; Jin, Lee-Way; Hinman, Jason; Johnson, David K.; Harvey, Danielle; Fornage, Myriam; Kramer, Joel H.; Staffaroni, Adam M.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Introduction: List-learning tasks are important for characterizing memory in ADRD research, but the Uniform Data Set neuropsychological battery (UDS-NB) lacks a list-learning paradigm; thus, sites administer a range of tests. We developed a harmonized memory composite that incorporates UDS memory tests and multiple list-learning tasks. Methods: Item-banking confirmatory factor analysis was applied to develop a memory composite in a diagnostically heterogenous sample (n=5943) who completed the UDS-NB and one of five list-learning tasks. Construct validity was evaluated through associations with demographics, disease severity, cognitive tasks, brain volume, and plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau181 and p-tau217). Test-retest reliability was assessed. Analyses were replicated in a racially/ethnically diverse cohort (n=1058). Results: Fit indices, loadings, distributions, and test-retest reliability were adequate. Expected associations with demographics and clinical measures within development and validation cohorts supported validity. Discussion: This composite enables researchers to incorporate multiple list-learning tasks with other UDS measures to create a single metric.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sex differences in the clinical manifestation of autosomal dominant frontotemporal dementia
    (Wiley, 2025) Memel, Molly; Staffaroni, Adam M.; Ilan-Gala, Ignacio; Garcia Castro, Jesús; Kornak, John; Tartaglia, Carmela M.; Saloner, Rowan; VandeBunte, Anna M.; Paolillo, Emily W.; Cadwallader, Claire J.; Chen, Coty; Gorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa; Mandelli, Malu; Apostolova, Liana; Graff-Radford, Neil; Litvan, Irene; Bayram, Ece; Pressman, Peter S.; Miyagawa, Toji; Mackenzie, Ian; Goldman, Jill; Darby, Richard R.; Appleby, Brian S.; Petrucelli, Len; Gendron, Tania; Heuer, Hilary W.; Forseberg, Leah K.; Rojas, Julio C.; Boeve, Brad F.; Brushaber, Nellie; Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko; Ghoshal, Nupur; Lapid, Maria; Pascual, Belen; Lee, Suzee; Ramos, Eliana Marisa; Ramanan, Vijay; Rademakers, Rosa; Rascovsky, Katya; Pantelyat, Alex; Masdeu, Joseph C.; Snyder, Allison; Boxer, Adam L.; Rosen, Howard J.; Casaletto, Kaitlin; ALLFTD Consortium; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Sex differences are apparent in neurodegenerative diseases but have not been comprehensively characterized in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Methods: Participants included 337 adults with autosomal dominant FTD enrolled in the ALLFTD Consortium. Clinical assessments and plasma were collected annually for up to 6 years. Linear mixed-effects models investigated how sex and disease stage are associated with longitudinal trajectories of cognition, function, and neurofilament light chain (NfL). Results: While sex differences were not apparent at asymptomatic stages, females showed more rapid declines across all outcomes in symptomatic stages compared to males. In asymptomatic participants, the association between baseline NfL and clinical trajectories was weaker in females versus males, a difference that was not present in symptomatic participants. Discussion: In genetic FTD, females show cognitive resilience in early disease stages followed by steeper clinical declines later in the disease. Baseline NfL may be a less sensitive prognostic tool for clinical progression in females with FTD-causing mutations. Highlights: Females with genetic FTD exhibit overall steeper increases in plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) than males. Females with genetic FTD outperform NfL levels in asymptomatic stages compared to males. Once symptomatic, females with genetic FTD decline more rapidly than males. Plasma NfL is a stronger prognostic marker in asymptomatic males than females.