IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks :: Browsing by Author "Palmer, Megan M."

Browsing by Author "Palmer, Megan M."

Now showing 1 - 10 of 15

6: Enhancing Vitality in Academic Medicine
(Wiley, 2013) Palmer, Megan M.; Hoffmann-Longtin, Krista; Ribera, Tony; Dankoski, Mary E.; Ribera, Amy K.; Nelson Laird, Tom F.
The prevalence of low satisfaction and increased stress among faculty in academic medicine makes understanding faculty vitality in this field more important than ever before. To explore the contributors to and outcomes of faculty vitality, we conducted a multi-institutional study of faculty in academic medicine (N = 1,980, 42 percent response rate). Faculty were surveyed about climate and leadership, career and life management, satisfaction, engagement, productivity, and involvement in faculty development. Analysis reveals that controlling for other factors, academic medicine faculty who participate regularly in faculty development activities are significantly more satisfied, engaged, and productive.
Business of Medicine: Developing Leaders in Academic Medicine and Learning Health Systems
(Dove Press, 2024-06-24) Sotto-Santiago, Sylk; Neal, Chemen; Caudill, Darren; Gist, Amanda; Eastwick, Susannah; Palmer, Megan M.; Geraci, Mark W.; Aronoff, David M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
Purpose: To develop healthcare professionals as clinical leaders in academic medicine and learning health system; and uncover organizational barriers, as well as pathways and practices to facilitate career growth and professional fulfillment. Methods: The Department of Medicine strategic plan efforts prompted the development of a business of medicine program informed by a needs assessment and realignment between academic departments and the healthcare system. The business of medicine leadership program launched in 2017. This descriptive case study presents its 5th year evaluation. Competencies were included from the Physician MBA program and from specific departmental needs and goals. Results: The program hosted a total of 102 clinical faculty. We had a 37% response rate of those retained at Indiana University School of Medicine. Overall, responses conveyed a positive experience in the course. Over 80% of participants felt that they gained skills in professional reflection, professional socialization, goal orientation, critical thinking, and commitment to profession. Financial literacy was overwhelmingly the skill that was reported to be the most valuable. Finance and accounting were mentioned as the most difficult concepts to understand. Familiar concepts included communication, LEAN, and wellness related topics. One hundred percent of participants said they are utilizing the skills gained in this program in their current role and that they would recommend the course to others. Conclusion: Business of medicine courses are more common now with programs describing elements informed by health system operations. However, few programs incorporate aspects of wellness, equity, diversity, inclusion, and health equity. Our program makes the case for multiple ways to develop inclusive leaders through a focused five-month program. It also recognizes that to really impact the learning health system, health professionals need leadership development and leaders suited to work alongside career administrators, all aiming towards a common goal of equitable patient-centered care.
Despite faculty skepticism: Lessons from a graduate-level seminar in a hybrid course environment
(Taylor & Francis, 2014) Palmer, Megan M.; Shaker, Genevieve; Hoffmann-Longtin, Krista
A recent survey of 2,251 university faculty members revealed that only one in five agreed that online courses can achieve learning outcomes equivalent to those of in-person courses (Lederman and Jaschik 2013). In an effort to determine if online graduate courses can be effective, in this study we explore the extent to which qualities commonly found in graduate level seminars can be replicated in hybrid graduate-level courses. A course for students in a higher education graduate program titled “The American Community College” serves as the study case. The course was developed as a hybrid with synchronous, asynchronous, and in-person elements intended to foster highly interactive exchanges of information, deep analysis of subject matter, and advanced means of communicating one’s ideas: all elements of a successful graduate-level course. Web technologies including wikis, blogs, and podcasting provided creative and varied pedagogical tools, which could be fully realized only when students were immersed in the online learning environment. Data collected from students across two semesters and assessment of learning outcomes indicate the value and success of the approach and several advantages to in-person courses, generating a set of implications.
Does time matter? : a search for meaningful medical school faculty cohorts
(2014-12) Guillot III, Gerard Majella; Palmer, Megan M.; Dankoski, Mary E.; Nelson Laird, Thomas F.; Seifert, Mark F.; Shew, Ronald L.
Background. Traditionally, departmental appointment type (basic science or clinical) and/or degree earned (PhD, MD, or MD-PhD) have served as proxies for how we conceptualize clinical and basic science faculty. However, the landscape in which faculty work has considerably changed and now challenges the meaning of these cohorts. Within this context I introduce a behavior-based role variable that is defined by how faculty spend their time in four academic activities: teaching, research, patient care, and administrative duties. Methods. Two approaches to role were compared to department type and degree earned in terms of their effects on how faculty report their perceptions and experiences of faculty vitality and its related constructs. One approach included the percent of time faculty spent engaged in each of the four academic activities. The second approach included role groups described by a time allocation rubric. This study included faculty from four U.S. medical schools (N = 1,497) and data from the 2011 Indiana University School of Medicine Faculty Vitality Survey. Observed variable path analysis evaluated models that included traditional demographic variables, the role variable, and faculty vitality constructs (e.g., productivity, professional engagement, and career satisfaction). Results. Role group effects on faculty vitality constructs were much stronger than those of percent time variables, suggesting that patterns of how faculty distribute their time are more important than exactly how much time they allocate to single activities. Role group effects were generally similar to, and sometimes stronger than, those of department type and degree earned. Further, the number of activities that faculty participate in is as important a predictor of how faculty experience vitality constructs as their role groups. Conclusions. How faculty spend their time is a valuable and significant addition to vitality models and offers several advantages over traditional cohort variables. Insights into faculty behavior can also show how institutional missions are (or are not) being served. These data can inform hiring practices, development of academic tracks, and faculty development interventions. As institutions continue to unbundle faculty roles and faculty become increasingly differentiated, the role variable can offer a simple way to study faculty, especially across multiple institutions.
The Donors Next Door; Raising Funds from Faculty for Faculty Development Centers
(Wiley, 2012) Shaker, Genevieve G.; Palmer, Megan M.
As a result of waning institutional support and charitable foundation interest, teaching and learning centers and other faculty development units may have little choice but to turn to private donors. Although faculty and staff giving is an important part of higher education fundraising, considering faculty as potential donors for faculty development centers is uncommon. In this chapter, we provide information on faculty and staff giving, review the related literature, share findings from a new study on faculty major donors, and provide a series of recommendations, stemming from the literature and the major donor study, to inform fundraising efforts by faculty development centers.
Exploring Gender Bias in Nursing Evaluations of Emergency Medicine Residents
(Wiley, 2019) Brucker, Krista; Whitaker, Nash; Morgan, Zachary S.; Pettit, Katie; Thinnes, Erynn; Banta, Alison M.; Palmer, Megan M.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
Objectives Nursing evaluations are an important component of residents’ professional development as nurses are present for interactions with patients and nonphysician providers. Despite this, there has been few prior studies on the benefits, harms, or effectiveness of using nursing evaluations to help guide emergency medicine residents’ development. We hypothesized that gender bias exists in nursing evaluations and that female residents, compared to their male counterparts, would receive more negative feedback on the perception of their interpersonal communication skills. Methods Data were drawn from nursing evaluations of residents between March 2013 and April 2016. All comments were coded if they contained words falling into four main categories: standout, ability, grindstone, and interpersonal. This methodology and the list of words that guided coding were based on the work of prior scholars. Names and gendered pronouns were obscured and each comment was manually reviewed and coded for valence (positive, neutral, negative) and strength (certain or tentative) by at least two members of the research team. Following the qualitative coding, quantitative analysis was performed to test for differences. To evaluate whether any measurable differences in ability between male and female residents existed, we compiled and compared American Board of Emergency Medicine in‐training examination scores and relevant milestone evaluations between female and male residents from the same period in which the residents were evaluated by nursing staff. Results Of 1,112 nursing evaluations, 30% contained comments. Chi‐square tests on the distribution of valence (positive, neutral, or negative) indicated statistically significant differences in ability and grindstone categories based on the gender of the resident. A total of 51% of ability comments about female residents were negative compared to 20% of those about male residents (χ2 = 11.83, p < 0.01). A total of 57% of grindstone comments about female residents were negative as opposed 24% of those about male residents (χ2 = 6.03, p < 0.01). Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that, despite the lack of difference in ability or competence as measured by in‐service examination scores and milestone evaluations, nurses evaluate female residents lower in their abilities and work ethic compared to male residents.
Factors that Contribute to Resident Teaching Effectiveness
(Cureus, 2019-03-21) Rutz, Matt; Turner, Joseph; Pettit, Katie; Palmer, Megan M.; Perkins, Anthony; Cooper, Dylan D; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
Background One of the key components of residency training is to become an educator. Resident physicians teach students, advanced practice providers, nurses, and even faculty on a daily basis. Objective The goal of this study was to identify the objective characteristics of residents, which correlate with perceived overall teaching effectiveness. Methods We conducted a one-year, retrospective study to identify factors that were associated with higher resident teaching evaluations. Senior emergency medicine (EM) teaching residents are evaluated by medical students following clinical teaching shifts. Eighteen factors pertaining to resident teaching effectiveness were chosen. Two items from the medical students' evaluations were analyzed against each factor: teaching effectiveness was measured on a five-point Likert scale and an overall teaching score (1-75). Results A total of 46 EM residents and 843 medical student evaluations were analyzed. The ACGME milestones for systems-based practice (p = 0.02) and accountability (p = 0.05) showed a statistically significant association with a rating of "five" on the Likert scale for teaching effectiveness. Three other ACGME milestones, systems-based practice (p = 0.01), task switching (p = 0.04), and team management (p = 0.03) also showed a statically significant association of receiving a score of 70 or greater on the overall teaching score. Conclusion Residents with higher performance associated with system management and accountability were perceived as highly effective teachers. USMLE and in-service exams were not predictive of higher teaching evaluations. Our data also suggest that effective teachers are working in both academic and community settings, providing a potential resource to academic departments and institutions.
Grit and beliefs about intelligence: the relationship and role these factors play in the self-regulatory processes involved in medical students learning gross anatomy
(2015-05) Fillmore, Erin Paige; Helfenbein, Robert J.; Palmer, Megan M.; Seifert, Mark F.; Shew, Ronald L.; Brokaw, James J.
Background: Gross anatomy is a foundational medical school course upon which other courses and patient care is grounded; however, variability in student performance suggests potential in studying underlying non-academic factors to explain some of these inconsistencies. Thus, this study examined medical students’ implicit theories of intelligence (ITI) and grit in order to better understand student learning outcomes in gross anatomy. Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted using 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year medical students who successfully completed gross anatomy. Students (n=382) completed the ITI Scale and Short Grit Scale in order to identify individual’s ITI and grit scores. Subsequent interviews (n=25) were conducted to explore how medical students set goals, operated while reaching those goals, and monitored their progress in achieving those goals. Results: Entity and incremental theorists with high grit performed significantly better in gross anatomy when compared to those with low grit. Further, highly gritty incremental and entity theorists were hard workers and showed resilience in the face of challenges. Specifically, those with an entity ITI had the central goal of getting an honors grade, while those with an incremental ITI desired to understand and apply their anatomical knowledge. Conversely, low grit individuals became overwhelmed by challenges, were more likely to show an inconsistent work ethic, and questioned their ability to master the material. An individual’s ITI, more so than grit, drove the presence of negative emotions in a medical student, with entity theorists feeling anxious and vulnerable, and incremental theorists feeling fewer negative emotions. Finally, grit level moderated how a medical student would respond to negative emotions, with highly gritty individuals exhibiting more constructive coping mechanisms. Conclusions: These findings suggest that medical students who possess high grit and an incremental theory of intelligence have the most effective learning strategies, set achievable goals, and enlist effective coping mechanisms while learning gross anatomy. The findings and tools used in this study could be incorporated into the medical school admissions process. Finally, findings reinforce the value of examining the ITI and grit of medical students, as they can provide educators with insight regarding important non-academic factors driving learning in gross anatomy.
Investigating the Long-Term Outcomes of Service-Learning
(2022-10) Schmalz, Naomi Alexandra; Byram, Jessica N.; Hoffman, Leslie A.; Organ, Jason M.; Palmer, Megan M.; Wisco, Jonathan J.
Anatomy Academy (AA) is a service-learning program in which pre- and current health professional students (Mentors) work in pairs to teach anatomy, physiology, and nutrition to children in the community. The purpose of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term Mentor outcomes in personal, social, civic, academic, and professional domains. Former Mentors were invited to complete a survey of Likert-style and free response questions evaluating the perceived impact of their AA experience on: teaching skills, personal and interpersonal development, civic engagement, and academic and professional development. Follow-up interviews with a subset of survey respondents were performed. The survey was completed by 219 Mentors and 17 survey respondents were interviewed. Over 50% of former Mentors reported moderate or major impact of AA participation on elements of personal and interpersonal development (e.g., selfesteem [57.6%], altruism [67.9%], communication skills [60.1%], and ability to work with others [72.6%]) and community service participation (54.2%) that endures in the years after the program. Mentors who worked with low-income or Special needs populations reported unique impacts in personal, interpersonal, and civic domains. A majority of former Mentors agreed that AA participation helped them learn practical skills (76.3%) and factual knowledge (65.4%) relevant to the their careers, with several current health professionals reported that they regularly employ teaching and interpersonal skills learned while Mentors in their roles as physicians, nurses, or physician’s assistants. A majority of former Mentors reported that AA validated their choice to either pursue a healthcare career or not (59.7%), increased their confidence in performing professional tasks (64.7%), and helped shape their professional identity (58.9%). These results indicate that a health education-based service-learning program offers undergraduate, graduate, and professional students interested in or actively pursuing a healthcare career benefits across personal, interpersonal, civic, and professional domains that support their academic progress and preparation for professional practice. This study contributes much-needed evidence of the long-term student outcomes of service-learning to the literature, with a particular focus on how the pedagogy can supplement the education and professional development of pre- and current health professional students.
Just Ask: Using Faculty Input to Inform Communication Strategies
(Wiley, 2014) Hoffmann Longtin, Krista; Palmer, Megan M.; Welch, Julie L.; Walvoord, Emily C.; Dankoski, Mary E.
Faculty members today are bombarded with information, yet limited in time and attention. Managing communication with faculty is an increasingly important function of faculty development offices. This study explored how communication frameworks can be paired with web design principles and attention economics to increase the effectiveness of communication with faculty members. We developed and tested communication approaches designed to enhance faculty members’ identification and involvement with our programs. The advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness of each model are presented. Ultimately, the study reframed our understanding of communication strategies, not as static tools, but rather as opportunities to engage faculty.

Browsing by Author "Palmer, Megan M."

Results Per Page

Sort Options