ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Olumide, Adesola"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The International Sexual Health And Reproductive Health Survey (I-SHARE-1): A Multi-Country Analysis of Adults from 30 Countries Prior to and During the Initial COVID-19 Wave
    (medRxiv: The Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2021-10-19) Erausquin, Jennifer Toller; Tan, Rayner K. J.; Uhlich, Maximiliane; Francis, Joel M.; Kumar, Navin; Campbell, Linda; Zhang, Wei-Hong; Hlatshwako, Takhona G.; Kosana, Priya; Shah, Sonam; Brenner, Erica M.; Remmerie, Lore; Mussa, Aamirah; Klapilova, Katerina; Mark, Kristen; Perotta, Gabriela; Gabster, Amanda; Wouters, Edwin; Burns, Sharyn; Hendriks, Jacqueline; Hensel, Devon J.; Shamu, Simukai; Strizzi, Jenna Marie; Esho, Tammary; Morroni, Chelsea; Eleuteri, Stefano; Sahril, Norhafiza; Low, Wah Yun; Plasilova, Leona; Lazdane, Gunta; Marks, Michael; Olumide, Adesola; Abdelhamed, Amr; López Gómez, Alejandra; Michielsen, Kristien; Moreau, Caroline; Tucker, Joseph D.; I-SHARE research consortium
    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced billions of people to shelter in place, altering social and sexual relationships worldwide. In many settings, COVID-19 threatened already precarious health services. However, there is limited evidence to date about changes to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) during the initial wave of COVID-19 disease. To address this gap, our team organized a multi-country, cross-sectional online survey as part of a global consortium. Methods: Consortium research teams conducted online surveys in 30 countries. Sampling methods included convenience, online panels, and population-representative. Primary outcomes included sexual behaviors, partner violence, and SRH service utilization, and we compared three months prior to and three months after policy measures to mitigate COVID-19. We used established indicators and analyses pre-specified in our protocol. We conducted meta-analyses for primary outcomes and graded the certainty of the evidence using Cochrane methods. Descriptive analyses included 22,724 individuals in 25 countries. Five additional countries with sample sizes <200 were included in descriptive meta-analyses. Results: Respondents were mean age 34 years; most identified as women (15160; 66.7%), cis-gender (19432; 86.6%) and heterosexual (16592; 77.9%). Among 4546 respondents with casual partners, condom use stayed the same for 3374 (74.4%) people and 640 (14.1%) people reported a decline. Fewer respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence during COVID-19 measures (1063/15144, 7.0%) compared to the period before COVID-19 measures (1469/15887, 9.3%). COVID-19 measures impeded access to condoms (933/10790, 8.7%), contraceptives (610/8175, 7.5%), and HIV/STI testing (750/1965, 30.7%). Pooled estimates from meta-analysis indicate during COVID-19 measures, 32.3% (95% CI 23.9-42.1) of people needing HIV/STI testing had hindered access, 4.4% (95% CI 3.4-5.4) experienced partner violence, and 5.8% (95% CI 5.4-8.2) decreased casual partner condom use (moderate certainty of evidence for each outcome). Meta-analysis findings were robust in sensitivity analyses that examined country income level, sample size, and sampling strategy. Conclusion: Open science methods are feasible to organize research studies as part of emergency responses. The initial COVID-19 wave impacted SRH behaviors and access to services across diverse global settings.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Telemedicine Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 8 Countries From the International Sexual Health and Reproductive Health Consortium: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    (JMIR, 2025-03-04) Tan, Rayner Kay Jin; Hensel, Devon; Ivanova, Olena; Bravo, Raquel Gomez; Olumide, Adesola; Adebayo, Emmanuel; Cleeve, Amanda; Gesselman, Amanda; Shah, Sonam Jyoti; Adesoba, Helen; Marley, Gifty; Tang, Weiming; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Telemedicine is an important way to fill in the access gap to in-person health care services during challenging times like pandemics. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the role that telemedicine played during the COVID-19 pandemic by multicountry comparison of the use of telemedicine prior to and during the pandemic. Methods: This study analyzes data from the second wave of the International Sexual Health and Reproductive Health study. This included data collected between April 2021 and July 2022 in 8 countries, including Armenia (n=296), Egypt (n=889), Germany (n=138), Moldova (n=311), Nigeria (n=205), Portugal (n=951), Singapore (n=13), and Spain (n=54). This study covered sociodemographics, sexual and reproductive health (SRH), and telemedicine use. Descriptive statistics and multilevel modeling were used to assess the factors influencing the use of telemedicine. Results: Overall, 2857 participants were recruited. Approximately 57.6% (n=1646) of participants had never used telemedicine prior to COVID-19 measures, while 45.9% (n=1311) of participants required health care but reported not using telemedicine services following the introduction of COVID-19 measures. In high-income countries, the most common mode reported was audio-based telemedicine services, with 283 (71.8%) and 417 (73.5%) participants doing so before and during COVID-19, respectively. This was followed by text-based telemedicine services, with 152 (38.6%) and 173 (30.5%) participants doing so before and during COVID-19, respectively. In low- to middle-income countries, many participants also reported using audio-based telemedicine services, with 288 (35.3%) and 237 (40.8%) participants doing so before and during COVID-19, respectively. This was followed by chat-based telemedicine services, with 265 (32.4%) and 217 (37.3%) participants doing so before and during COVID-19, respectively. Multilevel modeling revealed that those who were older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00) and were in countries with a higher gross domestic product per capita (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00) were less likely to have ever used telemedicine. Participants who were of male sex assigned at birth (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96) were less likely to use telemedicine during the pandemic. Participants who perceived that they were worse off financially were more likely to have switched to telemedicine during COVID-19 (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02-1.89) and were more likely to report having a poor or fair experience of telemedicine services (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.34-2.29). When sexual orientation was included in the model, nonheterosexual individuals were more likely to ever use telemedicine prior to COVID-19 (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08-1.69), more likely to have used telemedicine during COVID-19 (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.24-2.02), and more likely to have switched to telemedicine during COVID-19 (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.09-2.21). Conclusions: Telemedicine played a key role in addressing health care needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Age, sex, economic status, and sexual orientation influenced its use.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The International Sexual Health And REproductive Health during COVID-19 (I-SHARE) Study: A Multicountry Analysis of Adults from 30 Countries Prior to and During the Initial Coronavirus Disease 2019 Wave
    (Oxford University Press, 2022) Toller Erausquin, Jennifer; Tan, Rayner K.J.; Uhlich, Maximiliane; Francis, Joel M.; Kumar, Navin; Campbell, Linda; Zhang, Wei Hong; Hlatshwako, Takhona G.; Kosana, Priya; Shah, Sonam; Brenner, Erica M.; Remmerie, Lore; Mussa, Aamirah; Klapilova, Katerina; Mark, Kristen; Perotta, Gabriela; Gabster, Amanda; Wouters, Edwin; Burns, Sharyn; Hendriks, Jacqueline; Hensel, Devon J.; Shamu, Simukai; Strizzi, Jenna Marie; Esho, Tammary; Morroni, Chelsea; Eleuteri, Stefano; Sahril, Norhafiza; Low, Wah Yun; Plasilova, Leona; Lazdane, Gunta; Marks, Michael; Olumide, Adesola; Abdelhamed, Amr; López Gómez, Alejandra; Michielsen, Kristien; Moreau, Caroline; Tucker, Joseph D.; International Sexual Health And REproductive Health during COVID-19 Research Consortium; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: There is limited evidence to date about changes to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) during the initial wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To address this gap, our team organized a multicountry, cross-sectional online survey as part of a global consortium. Methods: Consortium research teams conducted online surveys in 30 countries. Sampling methods included convenience, online panels, and population-representative. Primary outcomes included sexual behaviors, partner violence, and SRH service use, and we compared 3 months prior to and during policy measures to mitigate COVID-19. We conducted meta-analyses for primary outcomes and graded the certainty of the evidence. Results: Among 4546 respondents with casual partners, condom use stayed the same for 3374 (74.4%), and 640 (14.1%) reported a decline. Fewer respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence during COVID-19 measures (1063 of 15 144, 7.0%) compared to before COVID-19 measures (1469 of 15 887, 9.3%). COVID-19 measures impeded access to condoms (933 of 10 790, 8.7%), contraceptives (610 of 8175, 7.5%), and human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted infection (HIV/STI) testing (750 of 1965, 30.7%). Pooled estimates from meta-analysis indicate that during COVID-19 measures, 32.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.9%-42.1%) of people needing HIV/STI testing had hindered access, 4.4% (95% CI, 3.4%-5.4%) experienced partner violence, and 5.8% (95% CI, 5.4%-8.2%) decreased casual partner condom use (moderate certainty of evidence for each outcome). Meta-analysis findings were robust in sensitivity analyses that examined country income level, sample size, and sampling strategy. Conclusions: Open science methods are feasible to organize research studies as part of emergency responses. The initial COVID-19 wave impacted SRH behaviors and access to services across diverse global settings.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University