- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Mostafaei, Farshad"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item The association of bone, fingernail and blood manganese with cognitive and olfactory function in Chinese workers(Elsevier, 2019-05-20) Rolle-McFarland, Danelle; Liu, Yingzi; Mostafaei, Farshad; Zauber, S. Elizabeth; Zhou, Yuanzhong; Li, Yan; Fan, Quiyan; Zheng, Wei; Nie, Linda H.; Wells, Ellen M.; Neurology, School of MedicineOccupational manganese (Mn) exposure has been associated with cognitive and olfactory dysfunction; however, few studies have incorporated cumulative biomarkers of Mn exposure such as bone Mn (BnMn). Our goal was to assess the cross-sectional association between BnMn, blood Mn (BMn), and fingernail Mn (FMn) with cognitive and olfactory function among Mn-exposed workers. A transportable in vivo neutron activation analysis (IVNAA) system was designed and utilized to assess BnMn among 60 Chinese workers. BMn and FMn were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Cognitive and olfactory function was assessed using Animal and Fruit Naming tests, World Health Organization/University of California-Los Angeles Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). Additional data were obtained via questionnaire. Regression models adjusted for age, education, factory of employment, and smoking status (UPSIT only), were used to assess the relationship between Mn biomarkers and test scores. In adjusted models, increasing BnMn was significantly associated with decreased performance on average AVLT scores [β (95% confidence interval (CI)) = -0.65 (-1.21, -0.09)] and Animal Naming scores [β (95% CI) = -1.54 (-3.00, -0.07)]. Increasing FMn was significantly associated with reduced performance measured by the average AVLT [β (95% CI) = -0.35 (-0.70, -0.006)] and the difference in AVLT scores [β (95% CI) = -0.40 (-0.77, -0.03)]. BMn was not significantly associated with any test scores; no significant associations were observed with Fruit Naming or UPSIT tests. BnMn and FMn, but not BMn, are associated with cognitive function in Mn-exposed workers. None of theItem The association of bone and blood manganese with motor function in Chinese workers(Elsevier, 2022) Rolle-McFarland, Danelle; Liu, Yingzi; Mostafaei, Farshad; Zauber, S. Elizabeth; Zhou, Yuanzhong; Li, Yan; Fan, Quiyan; Zheng, Wei; Nie, Linda H.; Wells, Ellen M.; Neurology, School of MedicineManganese (Mn) is an essential element. However, Mn overexposure is associated with motor dysfunction. This cross-sectional study assessed the association between bone Mn (BnMn) and whole blood Mn (BMn) with motor function in 59 Chinese workers. BnMn and BMn were measured using a transportable in vivo neutron activation analysis system and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, respectively. Motor function (manual coordination, postural sway, postural hand tremor, and fine motor function) was assessed using the Coordination Ability Test System (CATSYS) and the Purdue Pegboard. Relationships between Mn biomarkers and motor test scores were analyzed with linear regression models adjusted for age, education, current employment, and current alcohol consumption. BMn was significantly inversely associated with hand tremor intensity (dominant hand (β=-0.04, 95 % confidence interval (CI):-0.07, -0.01; non-dominant hand β=-0.05, 95 % CI:-0.08, -0.01) hand tremor center frequency (non-dominant hand β=-1.61, 95 % CI:-3.03, -0.19) and positively associated with the Purdue Pegboard Assembly Score (β = 4.58, 95 % CI:1.08, 8.07). BnMn was significantly inversely associated with finger-tapping performance (non-dominant hand β=-0.02, 95 % CI:-0.04,-0.004), mean sway (eyes closed and foam β=-0.68, 95 % CI:-1.31,-0.04), and positively associated with hand tremor center frequency (dominant hand, β = 0.40, 95 % CI:0.002, 0.80). These results suggest BMn is related to better postural hand tremor and fine motor control and BnMn is related to worse motor coordination and postural hand tremor but better (i.e., less) postural sway. The unexpected positive results might be explained by choice of biomarker or confounding by work-related motor activities. Larger, longitudinal studies in this area are recommended.