Browsing by Author "Mossman, Brenna"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Application of Terror Management Theory to End-Of-Life Care Decision-Making: A Narrative Literature Review
    (Sage, 2022-06) Perry, Laura M.; Mossman, Brenna; Lewson, Ashley B.; Gerhart, James I.; Freestone, Lily; Hoerger, Michael; Psychology, School of Science
    Patients with serious illnesses often do not engage in discussions about end-of-life care decision-making, or do so reluctantly. These discussions can be useful in facilitating advance care planning and connecting patients to services such as palliative care that improve quality of life. Terror Management Theory, a social psychology theory stating that humans are motivated to resolve the discomfort surrounding their inevitable death, has been discussed in the psychology literature as an underlying basis of human decision-making and behavior. This paper explores how Terror Management Theory could be extended to seriously ill populations and applied to their healthcare decision-making processes and quality of care received.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Fear of Palliative Care: Roles of Age and Depression Severity
    (Mary Ann Liebert, 2022) Alonzi, Sarah; Perry, Laura M.; Lewson, Ashley B.; Mossman, Brenna; Silverstein, Madison W.; Hoerger, Michael; Psychology, School of Science
    Background: Palliative care is underutilized due in part to fear and misunderstanding, and depression might explain variation in fear of palliative care. Objective: Informed by the socioemotional selectivity theory, we hypothesized that older adults with cancer would be less depressed than younger adults, and subsequently less fearful of utilizing palliative care. Setting/Subjects: Patients predominately located in the United States with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses (n = 1095) completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) Depression scale and rated their fear of palliative care using the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS). We examined the hypothesized intercorrelations, followed by a bootstrapped analysis of indirect effects in the PROCESS macro for SPSS. Results: Participants ranged from 26 to 93 years old (mean [M] = 60.40, standard deviation = 11.45). The most common diagnoses were prostate (34.1%), breast (23.3%), colorectal (17.5%), skin (15.3%), and lung (13.5%) cancer. As hypothesized, older participants had lower depression severity (r = −0.20, p < 0.001) and were less fearful of palliative care (r = −0.11, p < 0.001). Participants who were more depressed were more fearful of palliative care (r = 0.21, p < 0.001). An indirect effect (β = −0.04, standard error = .01, 95% confidence interval: −0.06 to −0.02) suggested that depression severity may account for up to 40% of age-associated differences in fear of palliative care. Conclusions: Findings indicate that older adults with cancer are more likely to favor palliative care, with depression symptom severity accounting for age-related differences. Targeted interventions among younger patients with depressive symptoms may be helpful to reduce fear and misunderstanding and increase utilization of palliative care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Increasing Readiness for Early Integrated Palliative Oncology Care: Development and Initial Evaluation of the EMPOWER 2 Intervention
    (Elsevier, 2021) Perry, Laura M.; Sartor, Oliver; Malhotra, Sonia; Alonzi, Sarah; Kim, Seowoo; Voss, Hallie M.; Rogers, James L.; Robinson, William; Harris, Kendra; Shank, Jessica; Morrison, David G.; Lewson, Ashley B.; Fuloria, Jyotsna; Miele, Lucio; Lewis, Brian; Mossman, Brenna; Hoerger, Michael; Psychology, School of Science
    Context: Early integrated palliative care improves quality of life, but palliative care programs are underutilized. Psychoeducational interventions explaining palliative care may increase patients' readiness for palliative care. Objectives: To 1) collaborate with stakeholders to develop the EMPOWER 2 intervention explaining palliative care, 2) examine acceptability, 3) evaluate feasibility and preliminary efficacy. Methods: The research was conducted at a North American cancer center and involved 21 stakeholders and 10 patient-participants. Investigators and stakeholders iteratively developed the intervention. Stakeholders rated acceptability of the final intervention. Investigators implemented a pre-post trial to examine the feasibility of recruiting 10 patients with metastatic cancer within one month and with a ≥50% consent rate. Preliminary efficacy outcomes were changes in palliative care knowledge and attitudes. Results: Using feedback from four stakeholder meetings, we developed a multimedia intervention tailored to three levels of health-literacy. The intervention provides knowledge and reassurance about the purpose and nature of palliative care, addressing cognitive and emotional barriers to utilization. Stakeholders rated the intervention and design process highly acceptable (3.78/4.00). The pilot met a priori feasibility criteria (10 patients enrolled in 14 days; 83.3% consent rate). The intervention increased palliative care knowledge by 83.1% and improved attitudes by 18.9 points on a 0 to 51 scale (Ps < 0.00001). Conclusions: This formative research outlines the development of a psychoeducational intervention about palliative care. The intervention is acceptable, feasible, and demonstrated promising pilot test results. This study will guide clinical teams in improving patients' readiness for palliative care and inform the forthcoming EMPOWER 3 randomized clinical trial.