Browsing by Author "Mosher, Catherine"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Associations between coping skills practice and symptom change in a psychosocial symptom management intervention for lung cancer patients and their family caregivers(2017) Winger, Joseph G.; Mosher, Catherine; Rand, Kevin; McGrew, John; Frankel, RichardLittle research has explored the degree to which specific intervention components predict improved health outcomes for cancer patients and their family caregivers. The present study examined relations of intervention components (i.e., coping skills) to symptoms in a telephone symptom management (TSM) intervention delivered concurrently to symptomatic lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. Guided by Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) frameworks, patient-caregiver dyads were taught coping skills including: a mindfulness exercise (i.e., noticing sounds and thoughts), pursed lips breathing, guided imagery, cognitive restructuring, and assertive communication. Symptom measures were administered at baseline and 2 and 6 weeks post-intervention. The measures assessed patient and caregiver depressive and anxiety symptoms as well as patient pain severity, distress related to breathlessness, and fatigue interference. Data were examined from patient-caregiver dyads enrolled in TSM (N = 51 dyads). Patients and caregivers were predominantly female (55% and 73%, respectively) and Caucasian (87%). The average patient was 63 years of age (SD = 8) and the average caregiver was 56 years of age (SD = 14). Seven autoregressive panel models tested relations of coping skills to symptoms. All models had at least adequate fit to the data (χ2 ps > 0.05, RMSEA values < 0.06). For patients, more assertive communication practice during the intervention was related to less pain severity, fatigue interference, and depressive and anxiety symptoms at 6 weeks post-intervention. Additionally, more guided imagery practice during the intervention was related to less fatigue interference and anxiety at 6 weeks post-intervention. In contrast, more cognitive restructuring practice during the intervention was related to more distress related to breathlessness and depressive and anxiety symptoms at 6 weeks post-intervention. Similarly, more practice of a mindfulness exercise during the intervention was related to more fatigue interference and anxiety at 6 weeks post-intervention. For caregivers, more guided imagery practice was related to more anxiety at 2 weeks post-intervention. All other pathways from coping skills to symptoms at 2 and 6 weeks post-intervention were non-significant for both patients and caregivers. Findings suggest intervention effectiveness may have been reduced by competing effects of certain coping skills. For lung cancer patients, future studies should consider focusing on assertive communication and guided imagery, as these two coping skills were most consistently associated with reduced symptoms. However, more studies are needed to better understand these findings and particular caution should be used when applying CBT-based interventions that have not been validated in lung cancer populations.Item Bias in pain care: What patient variables do providers report as influencing their treatment decisions?(2024-10) Rose-McCandlish, Margaret; Hirsh, Adam; Mosher, Catherine; Stewart, JesseRacialized and low socioeconomic status (SES) patients are often under-treated for chronic pain, despite reporting more pain on average. This disparity is likely due to multiple systemic factors, including healthcare provider bias. Providers often treat patients differently for chronic pain depending on the patient’s race and SES, but little is known about providers’ awareness of the extent to which patient demographic variables influence their pain treatment decisions. The present study examined the variables that providers report as influencing their pain treatment decisions, whether these variables group together to form distinct factors, and whether providers who demonstrate racial or socioeconomic bias in their treatment decisions report different patient variables or factors as influencing their treatment decisions compared to providers who did not demonstrate biases. Four hundred thirty-two United States-based physician residents and fellows (“providers”) made treatment decisions for 12 computer-simulated patients with chronic pain who varied by race (Black/White) and SES (high/low). Providers then rated the level to which 15 different variables influenced their treatment decision-making. Robust repeated measures ANOVAs indicated that providers rated patient sex/gender, age, and race as the least influential variables in their pain treatment decisions for the simulated patients. For the factor analysis, I sequentially omitted variables to achieve proper model fit and reliability and arrived at a three-factor solution; I labelled these factors Demographic, Biomedical, and Psychosocial, according to the variables’ conceptual overlap. Robust repeated measures ANOVAs found that reported use of variables did not differ between the providers who demonstrated bias and those who did not demonstrate bias, nor did factor scores for the three factors. The present study suggests that providers have low awareness of the extent to which patient race and SES may influence their clinical decision-making in pain care. Results can help inform future research to improve interventions to reduce the impact of racial and socioeconomic bias on providers’ treatment decisions for patients with chronic pain.Item Caregiver Adaptation among Black and White Families of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Comparison of the Two Racial Groups(2020-08) Yu, Yue; McGrew, John; Mosher, Catherine; Zapolski, Tamika; Wu, Wei; Ruble, LisaTo date, only two studies, both using the same sample at two different time points, have quantitatively examined outcomes in Black caregivers of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study examined family adaptational outcomes in Black and White caregivers of individuals with ASD using the double ABCX model of family adaptation to examine the impacts of stressors, the A in the model (e.g., autism symptom severity, general life demands), resources/supports, the B in the model (e.g., social support), and individual coping/stress appraisal styles, the C in the model (e.g., cognitive appraisal, religious coping) on caregiver positive and negative adaptation outcomes, the X in the model, (e.g., caregiver strain, benefit finding, family quality of life). Black and White caregivers were compared on adaptation outcomes at the family, dyadic, and individual level, including both positively valenced (e.g., benefit finding) and negatively valenced outcomes (e.g., depression, caregiver strain). Participants were Black (N = 24) and White (N = 32) primary caregivers of individuals with ASD. Racial differences were found for both the general and racial-specific factors in the ABCX model. White and Black caregivers reported moderate and equal levels of caregiver strain. However, Black caregivers reported greater levels of anxiety and depression and lower levels of life satisfaction. When adjusting for potential ABC covariates, racial differences in outcomes were no longer significant. That is, racial differences in outcomes could be explained by differences in the proximal elements represented by the ABC variables of the model (e.g., passive-avoidance coping, religious coping). Black caregivers reported higher levels of pile-up of demands, formal social support, threat appraisal, passive-avoidance coping, and positive and negative religious coping than White caregivers. Different factors were related to caregiver strain in the two racial groups. Conscientiousness was a protective factor against caregiver strain for Black caregivers, whereas greater use of passive-avoidance coping and threat appraisal, higher levels of neuroticism and barriers to care, and lower levels of satisfaction with services, parenting self-efficacy, and formal social support were explanatory factors for increased caregiver strain among White caregivers. These results are helpful in informing interventions and support the cultural adaptation of care as provided to Black caregivers of individuals with ASD.Item Development of a Patient Centered Outcome Questionnaire for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients(2020-05) Krueger, Ellen F.; Mosher, Catherine; Hirsh, Adam; McGrew, JohnSymptom research with advanced lung cancer patients has primarily focused on symptom severity, frequency, and distress; yet, little is known about advanced lung cancer patients’ priorities and success criteria for symptom improvement. To address these gaps in the literature, this study examined these outcomes using a modified Patient Centered Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ), which has largely been used with adults with chronic pain. Advanced lung cancer patients (N = 102) were recruited from the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center to participate in a one-time self-report survey, including demographic and medical questionnaires, symptom treatment history, standardized measures of symptom severity and quality of life, and the modified PCOQ focused on eight common symptoms in advanced lung cancer. Cancer information was collected from medical records. My primary aim was to evaluate the construct validity of the PCOQ. As hypothesized, symptom severity ratings on the PCOQ were positively correlated with standardized assessments of the same symptoms as well as functional status. Greater severity of most symptoms on the PCOQ was also correlated with worse quality of life, and greater severity of four symptoms was correlated with having more medical comorbidities. Positive, moderate correlations were found between the severity and importance of seeing improvement in cough, fatigue, sleep problems, and pain on the PCOQ. Patients considered low levels of symptom severity to be acceptable following symptom treatment; no differences were found across the eight symptoms. Latent profile analysis identified four patient subgroups based on the importance of seeing improvement in each of the symptoms: (1) those who rated all symptoms as low in importance (n = 12); (2) those who rated bronchial symptoms and sleep problems as low in importance and all other symptoms as moderately important (n = 29); (3) those who rated nausea and emotional distress as low in importance and all other symptoms as moderately important (n = 23); and (4) those who rated all symptoms as highly important (n = 33). These subgroups were unrelated to demographic and clinical factors, except for functional status. Findings suggest that symptom severity and importance are related yet distinct aspects of the advanced lung cancer symptom experience. Furthermore, patients have heterogeneous priorities for symptom management, which has implications for tailoring treatment.Item Measurement of Patients' Acceptable Symptom Levels and Priorities for Symptom Improvement in Advanced Prostate Cancer(Research Square, 2024-09-18) Snyder, Stella; Secinti, Ekin; Krueger, Ellen; Adra, Nabil; Pili, Roberto; Hanna, Nasser; Mosher, Catherine; Psychology, School of SciencePurpose: Limited research has evaluated the success criteria and priorities for symptom improvement of patients with cancer to inform patient-centered care. In this study, we adapted and tested a measure of these constructs, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ), for patients with advanced prostate cancer. We compared acceptable symptom severity levels following symptom treatment across 10 symptoms and identified patient subgroups based on symptom importance. Methods: Patients with advanced prostate cancer (N = 99) participated in a one-time survey, which included a modified version of the PCOQ, standard symptom measures, and additional clinical characteristics. Results: The modified PCOQ demonstrated construct validity through its correlations with related theoretical constructs. There was a moderate correlation between symptom severity and importance. Acceptable symptom severity levels were generally low, with sexual dysfunction having a higher acceptable severity than most other symptoms. Three patient subgroups were identified: (1) those who rated all symptoms as low in importance (n = 43); (2) those who rated all symptoms as moderately important (n = 33); and (3) those who rated all symptoms as highly important (n= 18). Subgroups were associated with functional status, fatigue, sleep problems, pain, and emotional distress. Conclusion: The modified PCOQ demonstrated preliminary evidence of construct validity. Patients generally considered low symptom severity to be acceptable, with variations across symptoms. Results suggest that symptom severity and importance are related but distinct aspects of the symptom experience in advanced prostate cancer. Patients' diverse priorities for symptom improvement point to the need for individualized treatment plans.Item Supportive Care for Adults with Advanced Cancer and their Family Caregivers(Center for Translating Research Into Practice, IU Indianapolis, 2022-10-28) Mosher, CatherineIn this presentation, Dr. Catherine Mosher presents an intervention study that her team conducted to reduce the negative impact of symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and improve family caregivers’ well-being. This study used a telephone-delivered approach to reach participants throughout the state of Indiana. Also, a community partner shares her experiences as a cancer survivor.