Browsing by Author "Mormino, Elizabeth C."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Divergent Cortical Tau Positron Emission Tomography Patterns Among Patients With Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
    (American Medical Association, 2022) Young, Christina B.; Winer, Joseph R.; Younes, Kyan; Cody, Karly A.; Betthauser, Tobey J.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Schultz, Aaron; Sperling, Reisa A.; Greicius, Michael D.; Cobos, Inma; Poston, Kathleen L.; Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; Harvard Aging Brain Study; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Importance: Characterization of early tau deposition in individuals with preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) is critical for prevention trials that aim to select individuals at risk for AD and halt the progression of disease. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of cortical tau positron emission tomography (PET) heterogeneity in a large cohort of clinically unimpaired older adults with elevated β-amyloid (A+). Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study examined prerandomized tau PET, amyloid PET, structural magnetic resonance imaging, demographic, and cognitive data from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) Study from April 2014 to December 2017. Follow-up analyses used observational tau PET data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), the Harvard Aging Brain Study (HABS), and the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (together hereinafter referred to as Wisconsin) to evaluate consistency. Participants were clinically unimpaired at the study visit closest to the tau PET scan and had available amyloid and tau PET data (A4 Study, n = 447; ADNI, n = 433; HABS, n = 190; and Wisconsin, n = 328). No participants who met eligibility criteria were excluded. Data were analyzed from May 11, 2021, to January 25, 2022. Main outcomes and measures: Individuals with preclinical AD with heterogeneous cortical tau PET patterns (A+T cortical+) were identified by examining asymmetrical cortical tau signal and disproportionate cortical tau signal relative to medial temporal lobe (MTL) tau. Voxelwise tau patterns, amyloid, neurodegeneration, cognition, and demographic characteristics were examined. Results: The 447 A4 participants (A+ group, 392; and normal β-amyloid group, 55), with a mean (SD) age of 71.8 (4.8) years, included 239 women (54%). A total of 36 individuals in the A+ group (9% of the A+ group) exhibited heterogeneous cortical tau patterns and were further categorized into 3 subtypes: asymmetrical left, precuneus dominant, and asymmetrical right. A total of 116 individuals in the A+ group (30% of the A+ group) showed elevated MTL tau (A+T MTL+). Individuals in the A+T cortical+ group were younger than those in the A+T MTL+ group (t61.867 = -2.597; P = .03). Across the A+T cortical+ and A+T MTL+ groups, increased regional tau was associated with reduced hippocampal volume and MTL thickness but not with cortical thickness. Memory scores were comparable between the A+T cortical+ and A+T MTL+ groups, whereas executive functioning scores were lower for the A+T cortical+ group than for the A+T MTL+ group. The prevalence of the A+T cortical+ group and tau patterns within the A+T cortical+ group were consistent in ADNI, HABS, and Wisconsin. Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that early tau deposition may follow multiple trajectories during preclinical AD and may involve several cortical regions. Staging procedures, especially those based on neuropathology, that assume a uniform trajectory across individuals are insufficient for disease monitoring with tau imaging.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Introduction to special edition, "State of the Field: Advances in Neuroimaging from the 2016 Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium"
    (Elsevier, 2016-12-21) Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Wolk, David A.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Department of Neurology, IU School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive resilience to Alzheimer's disease
    (Oxford University Press, 2022) Eissman, Jaclyn M.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Mahoney, Emily R.; Smith, Alexandra N.; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Scollard, Phoebe; Choi, Seo Eun; Bush, William S.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Lu, Qiongshi; Fardo, David W.; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse; Kaczorowski, Catherine C.; Hernandez Saucedo, Hector; Widaman, Keith F.; Buckley, Rachel F.; Properzi, Michael J.; Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Yang, Hyun Sik; Harrison, Theresa M.; Hedden, Trey; Nho, Kwangsik; Andrews, Shea J.; Tommet, Douglas; Hadad, Niran; Sanders, R. Elizabeth; Ruderfer, Douglas M.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Zhong, Xiaoyuan; Raghavan, Neha S.; Vardarajan, Badri N.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); A4 Study Team; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li San; Cruchaga, Carlos; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Cox, Nancy J.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Larson, Eric B.; Sperling, Reisa A.; Mayeux, Richard; Cuccaro, Michael L.; Bennett, David A.; Schneider, Julie A.; Crane, Paul K.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Approximately 30% of elderly adults are cognitively unimpaired at time of death despite the presence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology at autopsy. Studying individuals who are resilient to the cognitive consequences of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology may uncover novel therapeutic targets to treat Alzheimer's disease. It is well established that there are sex differences in response to Alzheimer's disease pathology, and growing evidence suggests that genetic factors may contribute to these differences. Taken together, we sought to elucidate sex-specific genetic drivers of resilience. We extended our recent large scale genomic analysis of resilience in which we harmonized cognitive data across four cohorts of cognitive ageing, in vivo amyloid PET across two cohorts, and autopsy measures of amyloid neuritic plaque burden across two cohorts. These data were leveraged to build robust, continuous resilience phenotypes. With these phenotypes, we performed sex-stratified [n (males) = 2093, n (females) = 2931] and sex-interaction [n (both sexes) = 5024] genome-wide association studies (GWAS), gene and pathway-based tests, and genetic correlation analyses to clarify the variants, genes and molecular pathways that relate to resilience in a sex-specific manner. Estimated among cognitively normal individuals of both sexes, resilience was 20-25% heritable, and when estimated in either sex among cognitively normal individuals, resilience was 15-44% heritable. In our GWAS, we identified a female-specific locus on chromosome 10 [rs827389, β (females) = 0.08, P (females) = 5.76 × 10-09, β (males) = -0.01, P(males) = 0.70, β (interaction) = 0.09, P (interaction) = 1.01 × 10-04] in which the minor allele was associated with higher resilience scores among females. This locus is located within chromatin loops that interact with promoters of genes involved in RNA processing, including GATA3. Finally, our genetic correlation analyses revealed shared genetic architecture between resilience phenotypes and other complex traits, including a female-specific association with frontotemporal dementia and male-specific associations with heart rate variability traits. We also observed opposing associations between sexes for multiple sclerosis, such that more resilient females had a lower genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis, and more resilient males had a higher genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Overall, we identified sex differences in the genetic architecture of resilience, identified a female-specific resilience locus and highlighted numerous sex-specific molecular pathways that may underly resilience to Alzheimer's disease pathology. This study illustrates the need to conduct sex-aware genomic analyses to identify novel targets that are unidentified in sex-agnostic models. Our findings support the theory that the most successful treatment for an individual with Alzheimer's disease may be personalized based on their biological sex and genetic context.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sex, racial, and APOE-ε4 allele differences in longitudinal white matter microstructure in multiple cohorts of aging and Alzheimer’s disease
    (bioRxiv, 2024-06-12) Peterson, Amalia; Sathe, Aditi; Zaras, Dimitrios; Yang, Yisu; Durant, Alaina; Deters, Kacie D.; Shashikumar, Niranjana; Pechman, Kimberly R.; Kim, Michael E.; Gao, Chenyu; Khairi, Nazirah Mohd; Li, Zhiyuan; Yao, Tianyuan; Huo, Yuankai; Dumitrescu, Logan; Gifford, Katherine A.; Wilson, Jo Ellen; Cambronero, Francis; Risacher, Shannon L.; Beason-Held, Lori L.; An, Yang; Arfanakis, Konstantinos; Erus, Guray; Davatzikos, Christos; Tosun, Duygu; Toga, Arthur W.; Thompson, Paul M.; Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Zhang, Panpan; Schilling, Kurt; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); BIOCARD Study Team; Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP); Albert, Marilyn; Kukull, Walter; Biber, Sarah A.; Landman, Bennett A.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Schneider, Julie; Barnes, Lisa L.; Bennett, David A.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Resnick, Susan M.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Archer, Derek B.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Introduction: The effects of sex, race, and Apolipoprotein E (APOE) - Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk factors - on white matter integrity are not well characterized. Methods: Diffusion MRI data from nine well-established longitudinal cohorts of aging were free-water (FW)-corrected and harmonized. This dataset included 4,702 participants (age=73.06 ± 9.75) with 9,671 imaging sessions over time. FW and FW-corrected fractional anisotropy (FAFWcorr) were used to assess differences in white matter microstructure by sex, race, and APOE-ε4 carrier status. Results: Sex differences in FAFWcorr in association and projection tracts, racial differences in FAFWcorr in projection tracts, and APOE-ε4 differences in FW limbic and occipital transcallosal tracts were most pronounced. Discussion: There are prominent differences in white matter microstructure by sex, race, and APOE-ε4 carrier status. This work adds to our understanding of disparities in AD. Additional work to understand the etiology of these differences is warranted.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sex-specific genetic predictors of memory, executive function, and language performance
    (Wiley, 2022) Eissman, Jaclyn M.; Smith, Alexandra N.; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Lee, Michael L.; Choi, Seo-Eun; Scollard, Phoebe; Trittschuh, Emily H.; Mez, Jesse B.; Bush, William S.; Engelman, Corinne D.; Lu, Qiongshi; Fardo, David W.; Widaman, Keith F.; Buckley, Rachel F.; Mormino, Elizabeth C.; Kunkle, Brian W.; Naj, Adam C.; Clark, Lindsay R.; Gifford, Katherine A.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI); Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC); A4 Study Team; The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP); Cuccaro, Michael L.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A.; Farrer, Lindsay A.; Wang, Li-San; Schellenberg, Gerard D.; Haines, Jonathan L.; Jefferson, Angela L.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Kukull, Walter A.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Keene, C. Dirk; Saykin, Andrew J.; Larson, Eric B.; Sperling, Reisa A.; Mayeux, Richard; Thompson, Paul M.; Martin, Eden R.; Bennett, David A.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Schneider, Julie A.; Crane, Paul K.; Hohman, Timothy J.; Dumitrescu, Logan; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is more prevalent in women than men, and robust evidence shows sex differences in the biological response to the AD neuropathological cascade. However, there is a lack of large-scale genetic studies on sex-specific genetic predictors of AD-related cognitive outcomes. Thus, we sought to elucidate the sex-specific genetic etiology of memory, executive function, and language performance. Method: This study included six cohorts of cognitive aging (Nmales=7,267, Nfemales=9,518). We applied psychometric approaches to build harmonized memory, executive function, and language composite scores. Next, for all domains, we calculated slopes from the cognitive scores (two or more timepoints) with linear mixed effects models. Then we performed sex-stratified and sex-interaction GWAS on these phenotypes, covarying for baseline age and the first three genetic principal components. We meta-analyzed across cohorts with a fixed-effects model. Sensitivity analyses for all models restricted the sample to cognitively unimpaired individuals. Result: In addition to well-established associations with cognition at the APOE locus, we identified three genetic loci that showed sex-specific effects with cognition. A chromosome 16 locus (rs114106271), a splicing-quantitative trait locus for RP11-152O14.4 and LINC02180 in the testis (GTEx), associated with baseline memory performance in men (β=0.13, P=2.40×10-8; PInteraction=8.96×10-6; Figures 1-2) but not in women (β=-0.01, P=0.76). A chromosome 14 locus (rs34074573), an expression-quantitative trait locus (GTEx) for HOMEZ (a homeobox gene), and for BCL2L2 (a previously reported AD risk gene), associated with longitudinal memory performance in men (β=-0.01, P=4.15×10-8; PInteraction=5.83×10-7; Figures 3-4) but not in women (β=0.001, P=0.09). Finally, a chromosome 6 locus (rs9382966) associated with longitudinal language performance in men with near genome-wide significance (β=-0.004, P=6.29×10-8; PInteraction=2.01×10-4) but not in women (β=-0.0003, P=0.61). Conclusion: Our results highlight some key sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive outcomes. Findings further suggest that some sex-specific genetic predictors have domain-specific associations, providing an exciting opportunity to better understand the molecular basis of memory, executive function, and language through genomic analysis. Although our findings need to be replicated, our GWAS analyses highlight the contribution of sex-specific genetic predictors beyond the APOE locus in conferring risk for late-life cognitive decline.