Browsing by Author "Mok, Samuel C."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Quality of Life and Adverse Events: Prognostic Relationships in Long-Term Ovarian Cancer Survival
    (Oxford University Press, 2021) Wenzel, Lari; Osann, Kathryn; McKinney, Chelsea; Cella, David; Fulci, Giulia; Scroggins, Mary J.; Lankes, Heather A.; Wang, Victoria; Nephew, Kenneth P.; Maxwell, George L.; Mok, Samuel C.; Conrads, Thomas P.; Miller, Austin; Mannel, Robert S.; Gray, Heidi J.; Hanjani, Parviz; Huh, Warner K.; Spirtos, Nick; Leitao, Mario M., Jr.; Glaser, Gretchen; Sharma, Sudarshan K.; Santin, Alessandro D.; Sperduto, Paul; Lele, Shashikant B.; Burger, Robert A.; Monk, Bradley J.; Birrer, Michael; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: There is a critical need to identify patient characteristics associated with long-term ovarian cancer survival. Methods: Quality of life (QOL), measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian-Trial Outcome Index (FACT-O-TOI), including physical, functional, and ovarian-specific subscales, was compared between long-term survivors (LTS) (8+ years) and short-term survivors (STS) (<5 years) of GOG 218 at baseline; before cycles 4, 7, 13, 21; and 6 months post-treatment using linear and longitudinal mixed models adjusted for covariates. Adverse events (AEs) were compared between survivor groups at each assessment using generalized linear models. All P values are 2-sided. Results: QOL differed statistically significantly between STS (N = 1115) and LTS (N = 260) (P < .001). Baseline FACT-O-TOI and FACT-O-TOI change were independently associated with long-term survival (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval = 1.03 to 1.06 and odds ratio = 1.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.05 to 1.07, respectively). A 7-point increase in baseline QOL was associated with a 38.0% increase in probability of LTS, and a 9-point increase in QOL change was associated with a 67.0% increase in odds for LTS. QOL decreased statistically significantly with increasing AE quartiles (cycle 4 quartiles: 0-5 vs 6-8 vs 9-11 vs ≥12 AEs, P = .01; cycle 21 quartiles: 0-2 vs 3 vs 4-5 vs ≥6 AEs, P = .001). Further, LTS reported statistically significantly better QOL compared with STS (P = .03 and P = .01, cycles 4 and 21, respectively), with similar findings across higher AE grades. Conclusions: Baseline and longitudinal QOL change scores distinguished LTS vs STS and are robust prognosticators for long-term survival. Results have trial design and supportive care implications, providing meaningful prognostic value in this understudied population.