Browsing by Author "Miller, Monica L."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Community Pharmacist-Provided Opioid Intervention Frequencies and Barriers
    (Elsevier, 2023) Nichols, Molly A.; Kepley, Kristen L.; Rosko, Kylee S.; Suchanek Hudmon, Karen; Curran, Geoffrey M.; Ott, Carol A.; Snyder, Margie E.; Miller, Monica L.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Community pharmacists are well-positioned to engage in opioid-related harm reduction activities (i.e., opioid interventions). However, several barriers to providing these interventions have been identified. Comparing the frequencies of opioid interventions and identifying which barriers are perceived to have the highest impact in providing interventions will yield valuable information for increasing opioid use disorder (OUD) care access within pharmacies. Objectives: To (1) characterize the frequency of 9 opioid interventions in community practice settings and (2) assess community pharmacists' perceptions of what impact 15 key barriers have on providing opioid interventions. Methods: This was a multi-state, cross-sectional, and descriptive survey study. Opioid interventions evaluated included prevention (e.g., OUD screening) and treatment (e.g., OUD resource referral); barriers encompassed confidence and knowledge, work environment, provider interactions, and patient interactions. Respondents were recruited from 3 community pharmacy practice-based research networks in the Midwest and South regions of the US. Recruitment and telephone survey administration occurred between December 2021 and March 2022. Descriptive statistics were computed and open-ended items were reviewed to identify common themes. Results: Sixty-nine of 559 pharmacists contacted (12.3%) completed the survey. All opioid interventions were reported to be provided less frequently than indicated in practice. Screening and referral interventions were provided least frequently, at 1.2 and 1.6 times on average, respectively, to the last 10 patients for which respondents felt each intervention was needed. Patient refusal, minimal or no reimbursement, inadequate staffing and time, and negative patient reactions were identified as the highest-impact barriers to providing opioid interventions. Approximately 26% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that pharmacy school adequately prepared them to provide opioid interventions in practice. Conclusion: Prioritizing the resolution of pharmacy work environment barriers will support pharmacists in routinely providing opioid interventions. Changes in Doctor of Pharmacy curricula and continuing education are also indicated to further prepare pharmacists to engage in opioid-related harm reduction.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of Clinical Interventions between Student Pharmacists on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences in Indianapolis, Indiana versus Eldoret, Kenya
    (MDPI, 2023-05-30) Karwa, Rakhi; Miller, Monica L.; Schellhase, Ellen; Crowe, Susie; Manji, Imran; Albertson, Shelby; Frauhiger, Monica; Pastakia, Sonak; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Student pharmacists can have a positive impact on patient care. The objective of this research was to compare clinical interventions made by Purdue University College of Pharmacy (PUCOP) student pharmacists completing internal medicine Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPE) in Kenya and the US. A retrospective analysis of interventions made by PUCOP student pharmacists participating in either the 8-week global health APPE at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH-Kenya) or the 4-week adult medicine APPE at the Sydney & Lois Eskenazi Hospital (SLEH-US) was completed. Twenty-nine students (94%) documented interventions from the MTRH-Kenya cohort and 23 (82%) from the SLEH-US cohort. The median number of patients cared for per day was similar between the MTRH-Kenya (6.98 patients per day, interquartile range [IQR] = 5.75 to 8.15) and SLEH-US students (6.47 patients per day, IQR = 5.58 to 7.83). MTRH-Kenya students made a median number of 25.44 interventions per day (IQR = 20.80 to 28.95), while SLEH-US students made 14.77 (IQR = 9.80 to 17.72). The most common interventions were medication reconciliation/t-sheet rewrite and patient chart reviews for MTRH-Kenya and the SLEH-US, respectively. This research highlights how student pharmacists, supported in a well-designed, location-appropriate learning environment, can positively impact patient care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Meeting the Needs of Underserved Patients in Western Kenya by Creating the Next Generation of Global Health Pharmacists
    (American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2016-03-25) Miller, Monica L.; Karwa, Rakhi; Schellhase, Ellen M.; Pastakia, Sonak D.; Crowe, Susie; Manji, Imran; Jakait, Beatrice; Maina, Mercy; Medicine Faculty Volunteers, IU School of Medicine
    Objective. To describe a novel training model used to create a sustainable public health-focused pharmacy residency based in Kenya and to describe the outcomes of this training program on underserved populations. Design. The postgraduate year 2 residency was designed to expose trainees to the unique public health facets of inpatient, outpatient, and community-based care delivery in low and middle-income countries. Public health areas of focus included supply chain management, reproductive health, pediatrics, HIV, chronic disease management, and teaching. Assessment. The outcomes of the residency were assessed based on the number of new clinical programs developed by residents, articles and abstracts written by residents, and resident participation in grant writing. To date, six residents from the United States and eight Kenyan residents have completed the residency. Eleven sustainable patient care services have been implemented as a result of the residency program. Conclusion. This pharmacy residency training model developed accomplished pharmacists in public health pharmacy, with each residency class expanding funding and clinical programming, contributing to curriculum development, and creating jobs.