Browsing by Author "Merlini, Giampaolo"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Amyloid nomenclature 2018: recommendations by the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) nomenclature committee(Taylor & Francis, 2018-10-02) Benson, Merrill D.; Buxbaum, Joel N.; Eisenberg, David S.; Merlini, Giampaolo; Saraiva, Maria J. M.; Sekijima, Yoshiki; Sipe, Jean D.; Westermark, Per; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineThe nomenclature committee of the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) meets every second year to discuss and formulate recommendations. The conclusions from the discussion at the XVI International Symposium on Amyloidosis in Kumamoto, Japan, 25–29 March 2018 and afterwards are summarized in this Nomenclature Article. From having recommended the use of the designation “amyloid fibril” for in vivo material only, ISA’s nomenclature committee now accepts its use more broadly following the international scientific literature. However, it is important always to stress the origin of the β-fibrils in order to avoid misunderstanding. Given the more broad use of the word “amyloid” several classes of amyloid fibrils may be distinguished. For the medical in vivo situation, and to be included in the amyloid nomenclature list, “amyloid” still means mainly extracellular tissue deposits of protein fibrils, recognized by specific properties, such as green-yellow birefringence after staining with Congo red. It should also be underlined that in vivo amyloid fibrils, in addition to the main protein contain associated compounds, particularly serum amyloid P-component (SAP) and proteoglycans, mainly heparan sulfate proteoglycan. With this definition there are presently 36 human amyloid proteins of which 14 appear only associated with systemic amyloidosis and 19 as localized forms. Three proteins can occur both as localized and systemic amyloidosis. Strictly intracellular aggregates are not included in this list.Item Inotersen Treatment for Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis(MMS, 2018-07) Benson, Merrill D.; Waddington-Cruz, Márcia; Berk, John L.; Polydefkis, Michael; Dyck, Peter J.; Wang, Annabel K.; Planté-Bordeneuve, Violaine; Barroso, Fabio A.; Merlini, Giampaolo; Obici, Laura; Scheinberg, Morton; Brannagan, Thomas H., III; Litchy, William J.; Whelan, Carol; Drachman, Brian M.; Adams, David; Heitner, Stephen B.; Conceição, Isabel; Schmidt, Hartmut H.; Vita, Giuseppe; Campistol, Josep M.; Gamez, Josep; Gorevic, Peter D.; Gane, Edward; Shah, Amil M.; Solomon, Scott D.; Monia, Brett P.; Hughes, Steven G.; Kwoh, Jesse; McEvoy, Bradley W.; Jung, Shiangtung W.; Baker, Brenda F.; Ackermann, Elizabeth J.; Gertz, Morie A.; Coelho, Teresa; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineBACKGROUND Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis is caused by pathogenic single-nucleotide variants in the gene encoding transthyretin (TTR) that induce transthyretin misfolding and systemic deposition of amyloid. Progressive amyloid accumulation leads to multiorgan dysfunction and death. Inotersen, a 2′-O-methoxyethyl–modified antisense oligonucleotide, inhibits hepatic production of transthyretin. METHODS We conducted an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 15-month, phase 3 trial of inotersen in adults with stage 1 (patient is ambulatory) or stage 2 (patient is ambulatory with assistance) hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive weekly subcutaneous injections of inotersen (300 mg) or placebo. The primary end points were the change in the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score+7 (mNIS+7; range, −22.3 to 346.3, with higher scores indicating poorer function; minimal clinically meaningful change, 2 points) and the change in the score on the patient-reported Norfolk Quality of Life–Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) questionnaire (range, −4 to 136, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life). A decrease in scores indicated improvement. RESULTS A total of 172 patients (112 in the inotersen group and 60 in the placebo group) received at least one dose of a trial regimen, and 139 (81%) completed the intervention period. Both primary efficacy assessments favored inotersen: the difference in the least-squares mean change from baseline to week 66 between the two groups (inotersen minus placebo) was −19.7 points (95% confidence interval [CI], −26.4 to −13.0; P<0.001) for the mNIS+7 and −11.7 points (95% CI, −18.3 to −5.1; P<0.001) for the Norfolk QOL-DN score. These improvements were independent of disease stage, mutation type, or the presence of cardiomyopathy. There were five deaths in the inotersen group and none in the placebo group. The most frequent serious adverse events in the inotersen group were glomerulonephritis (in 3 patients [3%]) and thrombocytopenia (in 3 patients [3%]), with one death associated with one of the cases of grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Thereafter, all patients received enhanced monitoring. CONCLUSIONS Inotersen improved the course of neurologic disease and quality of life in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. Thrombocytopenia and glomerulonephritis were managed with enhanced monitoring.Item International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013-06-20) Terpos, Evangelos; Morgan, Gareth; Dimopoulos, Meletios A.; Drake, Matthew T.; Lentzsch, Suzanne; Raje, Noopur; Sezer, Orhan; Garcıa-Sanz, Ramon; Shimizu, Kazuyuki; Turesson, Ingemar; Reiman, Tony; Jurczyszyn, Artur; Merlini, Giampaolo; Spencer, Andrew; Leleu, Xavier; Cavo, Michele; Munshi, Nikhil; Rajkumar, S. Vincent; Durie, Brian G.M.; Roodman, G. David; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicinePURPOSE: The aim of the International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma (MM) -related bone disease. METHODOLOGY: An interdisciplinary panel of clinical experts on MM and myeloma bone disease developed recommendations based on published data through August 2012. Expert consensus was used to propose additional recommendations in situations where there were insufficient published data. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were assigned and approved by panel members. RECOMMENDATIONS: Bisphosphonates (BPs) should be considered in all patients with MM receiving first-line antimyeloma therapy, regardless of presence of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography. However, it is unknown if BPs offer any advantage in patients with no bone disease assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid (ZOL) or pamidronate (PAM) is recommended for preventing skeletal-related events in patients with MM. ZOL is preferred over oral clodronate in newly diagnosed patients with MM because of its potential antimyeloma effects and survival benefits. BPs should be administered every 3 to 4 weeks IV during initial therapy. ZOL or PAM should be continued in patients with active disease and should be resumed after disease relapse, if discontinued in patients achieving complete or very good partial response. BPs are well tolerated, but preventive strategies must be instituted to avoid renal toxicity or osteonecrosis of the jaw. Kyphoplasty should be considered for symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. Low-dose radiation therapy can be used for palliation of uncontrolled pain, impending pathologic fracture, or spinal cord compression. Orthopedic consultation should be sought for long-bone fractures, spinal cord compression, and vertebral column instability.Item Long-term efficacy and safety of inotersen for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: NEURO-TTR open-label extension 3-year update(Springer, 2022) Brannagan, Thomas H.; Coelho, Teresa; Wang, Annabel K.; Polydefkis, Michael J.; Dyck, Peter J.; Berk, John L.; Drachman, Brian; Gorevic, Peter; Whelan, Carol; Conceição, Isabel; Plante‑Bordeneuve, Violaine; Merlini, Giampaolo; Obici, Laura; Campistol Plana, Josep Maria; Gamez, Josep; Kristen, Arnt V.; Mazzeo, Anna; Gentile, Luca; Narayana, Arvind; Olugemo, Kemi; Aquino, Peter; Benson, Merrill D.; Gertz, Morie; NEURO-T. T. R. Open-Label Extension Investigators; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR/ATTRv) results from the deposition of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) throughout the body, including peripheral nerves. Inotersen, an antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of hepatic TTR production, demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with the polyneuropathy associated with hATTR in the NEURO-TTR (NCT01737398) study. We report longer-term efficacy and safety data for inotersen, with a median treatment exposure of 3 years. Methods: Patients who satisfactorily completed NEURO-TTR were enrolled in its open-label extension (OLE) study. Efficacy assessments included the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score + 7 (mNIS + 7), Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL-DN) questionnaire total score, and the Short Form 36 (SF-36v2) Health Survey Physical Component Summary score. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Efficacy is reported for patients living in Europe and North America (this cohort completed the study approximately 9 months before the remaining group of patients outside these regions); safety is reported for the full safety dataset, comprising patients living in Europe, North America, and Latin America/Australasia. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02175004. Results: In the Europe and North America cohort of the NEURO-TTR study, 113/141 patients (80.1%) completed the study, and 109 patients participated in the OLE study. A total of 70 patients continued to receive inotersen (inotersen-inotersen) and 39 switched from placebo to inotersen (placebo-inotersen). The placebo-inotersen group demonstrated sustained improvement in neurological disease progression as measured by mNIS + 7, compared with predicted worsening based on projection of the NEURO-TTR placebo data (estimated natural history). The inotersen-inotersen group demonstrated sustained benefit, as measured by mNIS + 7, Norfolk QoL-DN, and SF-36v2, compared with estimated natural history as well as compared with the placebo-inotersen group. With a maximum exposure of 6.2 years, inotersen was not associated with any additional safety concerns or increased toxicity in the OLE study. Platelet and renal monitoring were effective in reducing the risk of severe adverse events in the OLE study. Conclusion: Inotersen treatment for > 3 years slowed progression of the polyneuropathy associated with hATTR, and no new safety signals were observed.