Browsing by Author "Medcalf, Spencer"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of post-discharge engagement for emergency department patients with opioid use history who received telehealth recovery coaching services
    (BMC, 2023-02-11) Watson, Dennis P.; Phalen, Peter; Medcalf, Spencer; Messmer, Sarah; McGuire, Alan; Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health
    Background: In recent years, emergency departments (EDs) across the nation have implemented peer recovery coach (PRC) services to support patients who use opioids. The majority of such interventions discussed in the literature follow an in-person modality where PRCs engage patients directly at the ED bedside. However, the use of telehealth services in EDs is becoming more popular. These services connect PRCs with ED patients in real-time via secure communications technology, and very little is known about the service- and clinical-based outcomes with which they are associated. The current study sought to assess factors associated with successful post-discharge follow-up of patients with a history of opioid use who received PRC telehealth services while in the ED. Method: Data come from records for 917 patients who engaged with a telehealth PRC one or more times (1208 total engagements) at 1 of 13 EDs within the same health system. A multilevel Poisson regression model was used to assess the degree to which variables predicted successful post-discharge follow-up, defined as the number of times a PRC successfully spoke with the patient each month after ED discharge. Results: At least one follow-up was successfully completed by a PRC for 23% of enrolled patients. Significant predictors of successful follow-up included patient employment at baseline (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]: 2.8, CI: 2.05-3.9), living in a rural area (IRR: 1.8, CI: 1.04-3.2), PRC provision of referrals (IRR: 1.7, CI: 1.2-2.2), number of ED encounters in the previous 365 days (IRR: 0.99, CI: 0.98-0.99), and duration of the initial PRC telehealth interaction (IRR: 0.87, CI: 0.85-0.88). Conclusion: Given that relationship development is a key tool in the PRC profession, understanding successful follow-up associated with telehealth engagement has unique importance. The results have potential utility for planning and implementing peer telehealth services in EDs and other locations, which is needed for the development of the PRC profession and the likely expansion of peer telehealth services.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Latent class analysis of emergency department patients engaged in telehealth peer recovery support services and associations of identified classes with post-discharge outcomes
    (Elsevier, 2024) Watson, Dennis P.; Swartz, James A.; Magee, Lauren A.; Bray, Bethany C.; Phalen, Peter; Medcalf, Spencer; McGuire, Alan B.; School of Public and Environmental Affairs
    Background: People with substance use disorders (SUDs) frequently use emergency department (ED) services. Despite evidence demonstrating that post-discharge SUD treatment linkage effectively reduces the number of ED re-presentations, relatively few hospitals have implemented interventions to identify and connect patients with SUDs to appropriate care. ED-based peer recovery support specialist (PRSS) interventions have emerged as a promising approach for hospitals, but more research is needed to understand the extent to which these interventions meet the needs of patients who present to the ED for different reasons and with various underlying concerns. Method: A retrospective cohort analysis used data from a telehealth PRSS program in 15 EDs within one Indiana hospital system. The study included 2950 ED patients who engaged with telehealth PRSS services between September 2018 and September 2021. Latent class analysis identified patterns of patient characteristics associated with post-discharge PRSS engagement and ED re-presentations. Covariate predictors and distal outcomes were assessed to examine the associations between class membership, demographic factors, and patient outcomes. Results: The study team selected a six-class model as the best fit for the data. Class 1, representing patients with opioid use disorder and mental health diagnoses who presented to the ED for an opioid overdose, was used as the reference class for all other statistical tests. Multinomial logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between covariate predictors, outcomes, and class membership. Regression results also demonstrate PRSSs had greater success contacting patients with prior year ED use and patients with a successful post-discharge PRSS contact were less likely to re-present to the ED. Conclusion: Results highlight the heterogeneity of patients with SUDs and emphasize the need for tailored interventions to address patient-specific needs more effectively. They also provide support for the perceived utility of PRSS engagement for ED patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Response to a peer telehealth intervention for emergency department patients presenting with opioid use disorder or unintentional overdose: a stratified interrupted time series analysis
    (Springer Nature, 2025-05-17) Tillson, Martha; Xu, Huiping; McGuire, Alan; Medcalf, Spencer; Beaudoin, Francesca L.; Watson, Dennis P.; Psychology, School of Science
    Background: People in the United States who use opioids frequently use emergency department (ED) services. Some hospitals have begun placing peer recovery support specialists (PRSS) in EDs to support and advocate for patients and provide linkages to services, in an effort to reduce future presentations for opioid-related and other health problems related to substance use. However, evidence supporting the impact of PRSS services on reducing future ED presentations is limited, and even less is known about ED-based PRSS services delivered via telehealth. Methods: Using records from a large Indiana-based hospital system, we conducted an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis of ED patients presenting for unintentional opioid overdose or other opioid-related issues. Over a five-year period, 2,542 unique ED visits were included across 12 hospitals. The primary outcome assessed was the impact of PRSS telehealth service implementation (comparing pre- and post-periods) on 30-day all-cause ED revisits. Analyses were also stratified by appropriate demographics. Results: There was no significant change in 30-day ED revisits between pre- and post-implementation of the PRSS telehealth program. Results of sex-stratified ITS indicated a significant change for females only, with decreasing log-odds of ED revisits post-program implementation (post-implementation slope OR = 0.911, p = 0.031; slope change OR = 0.874, p = 0.017). Conclusions: Although there was no detectable difference in overall ED revisits following program implementation, outcomes of stratified analyses suggested that the program may have been more impactful for females vs. males. Future research should examine the underlying mechanism of the observed sex differences to target behavioral change more effectively for all participants of telehealth PRSS services in ED settings.