Browsing by Author "McClelland, Shearwood"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adjuvant vs. salvage radiation therapy in men with high-risk features after radical prostatectomy: Survey of North American genitourinary expert radiation oncologists
    (Canadian Urological Association, 2019-05) McClelland, Shearwood; Sandler, Kiri A.; Degnin, Catherine; Chen, Yiyi; Mitin, Timur; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    INTRODUCTION: The management of patients with high-risk features after radical prostatectomy (RP) is controversial. Level 1 evidence demonstrates that adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) improves survival compared to no treatment; however, it may overtreat up to 30% of patients, as randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using salvage RT on observation arms failed to reveal a survival advantage of adjuvant RT. We, therefore, sought to determine the current view of adjuvant vs. salvage RT among North American genitourinary (GU) radiation oncology experts. METHODS: A survey was distributed to 88 practicing North American GU physicians serving on decision-making committees of cooperative group research organizations. Questions pertained to opinions regarding adjuvant vs. salvage RT for this patient population. Treatment recommendations were correlated with practice patterns using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Forty-two of 88 radiation oncologists completed the survey; 23 (54.8%) recommended adjuvant RT and 19 (45.2%) recommended salvage RT. Recommendation of active surveillance for Gleason 3+4 disease was a significant predictor of salvage RT recommendation (p=0.034), and monthly patient volume approached significance for recommendation of adjuvant over salvage RT; those seeing <15 patients/month trended towards recommending adjuvant over salvage RT (p=0.062). No other demographic factors approached significance. CONCLUSIONS: There is dramatic polarization among North American GU experts regarding optimal management of patients with high-risk features after RP. Ongoing RCTs will determine whether adjuvant RT improves survival over salvage RT. Until then, the almost 50/50 division seen from this analysis should encourage practicing clinicians to discuss the ambiguity with their patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Commentary: Fractionated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy and Hearing Preservation for Vestibular Schwannoma: Preliminary Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Clinical Trial
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2022-07) McClelland, Shearwood; Combs, Stephanie E.; Halasz, Lia M.; Lo, Simon S.; Shiue, Kevin; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development of a standardized method for radiation therapy contouring of the piriform cortex
    (Old City Publishing, 2019) McClelland, Shearwood; Watson, Gordon A.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    First report of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy
    (Elsevier, 2019-11) McClelland, Shearwood; Durm, Gregory A.; Birdas, Thomas J.; Musto, Paul M.; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a very rare disease, comprising approximately 3% of lung cancers. Even for Stage I disease, recurrence after resection is common, with a poor five-year overall survival. We present the first report of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pulmonary LCNEC. Methods: A 54-year-old woman with a left upper lobe pulmonary nodule underwent a wedge resection with thoracoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection, revealing a 2.3 cm pT1b N0 LCNEC. Approximately one year later, surveillance imaging demonstrated a new left upper lobe PET-avid nodule, resulting in completion left upper lobectomy revealing LCNEC, with 0/6 involved lymph nodes and negative staging studies. The patient subsequently chose surveillance over adjuvant chemotherapy; unfortunately 23 months later imaging revealed an enlarging 0.7 cm nodule adjacent to the previous resection site, despite the patient remaining in good health (KPS = 90). Subsequent restaging demonstrated no evidence of metastatic disease. Due to the morbidity of a third operation in this region, and based on the safety of SBRT for Stage I non small-cell lung cancer, the consensus decision from our thoracic oncology team was to proceed with SBRT as preferred management for presumptive second recurrence of LCNEC. The patient shortly thereafter underwent SBRT (50 Gy in 10 Gy/fraction) to this new nodule, 41 months following initial LCNEC diagnosis. Results: Four months following SBRT, the patient remains in excellent clinical condition (KPS 90), with no evidence of disease spread on surveillance studies. The nodule itself demonstrated no evidence of growth following SBRT. Conclusions: This first report of SBRT for pulmonary LCNEC demonstrates that SBRT is a feasible modality for this rare disease. A multidisciplinary thoracic oncology approach involving medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology and pulmonology is strongly recommended to ensure proper patient selection for receipt of SBRT.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Is moderate hypofractionation accepted as a new standard of care in north america for prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy? Survey of genitourinary expert radiation oncologists
    (Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, 2019-03) McClelland, Shearwood; Sandler, Kiri A.; Degnin, Catherine; Chen, Yiyi; Hung, Arthur Y.; Mitin, Timur; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    INTRODUCTION: Several recent randomized clinical trials have evaluated hypofractionated regimens against conventionally fractionated EBRT and shown similar effectiveness with conflicting toxicity results. The current view regarding hypofractionation compared to conventional EBRT among North American genitourinary experts for management of prostate cancer has not been investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was distributed to 88 practicing North American GU physicians serving on decision - making committees of cooperative group research organizations. Questions pertained to opinions regarding the default EBRT dose and fractionation for a hypothetical example of a favorable intermediate - risk prostate cancer (Gleason 3 + 4). Treatment recommendations were correlated with practice patterns using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Forty - two respondents (48%) completed the survey. We excluded from analysis two respondents who selected radical hypofractionation with 5 - 12 fractions as a preferred treatment modality. Among the 40 analyzed respondents, 23 (57.5%) recommend conventional fractionation and 17 (42.5%) recommended moderate hypofractionation. No demographic factors were found to be associated with preference for a fractionation regimen. Support for brachytherapy as a first choice treatment modality for low - risk prostate cancer was borderline significantly associated with support for moderate hypofractionated EBRT treatment modality (p = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: There is an almost equal split among North American GU expert radiation oncologists regarding the appropriateness to consider moderately hypofractionated EBRT as a new standard of care in management of patients with prostate cancer. Physicians who embrace brachytherapy may be more inclined to support moderate hypofractionated regimen for EBRT. It is unclear whether reports with longer followups will impact this balance, or whether national care and reimbursement policies will drive the clinical decisions. In the day and age of patient - centered care delivery, patients should receive an objective recommendation based on available clinical evidence. The stark division among GU experts may influence the design of future clinical trials utilizing EBRT for patients with prostate cancer.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Resolution of Radiation-Induced Necrosis in Arteriovenous Malformation with Bevacizumab: A Case Report and Review of Current Literature
    (Karger, 2021-05-27) Kwong, Forrest; Scarpelli, Daphne B.; Barajas, Ramon F.; Monaco, Debra; Tanyi, James A.; McClelland, Shearwood; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a proven treatment modality for inoperable arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the rate of radiation-induced necrosis (RIN) is as high as 10%. A 6-year-old female patient presented with severe headache, emesis, and syncope, and workup revealed a Spetzler-Martin grade 4 AVM with intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus. The patient underwent a right frontal ventriculostomy followed by a linear accelerator-based SRS of 16.9 Gy. At 19 years, she developed progressive neurological symptoms. Diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a recurrent parietal AVM nidus. We delivered the linear accelerator-based SRS of 18.5 Gy to the AVM nidus. Within 9 months, she experienced episodic headaches and left-sided weakness and spasticity; symptoms were initially managed with dexamethasone. Follow-up MRI was notable for edema and nondetectable blood flow, consistent with RIN and AVM obliteration. The second course of steroids did not provide the symptom control. Persistent RIN was noted on MRI, and she had stigmata of steroid toxicity (centripetal obesity, depression, and sleep disorder). Two infusions of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) were administered concurrently with a tapering dose of dexamethasone. The patient noted a near immediate improvement in her headaches, and 2 months following the second bevacizumab infusion, she reported a near-complete resolution of her symptoms and displayed improved ambulation. The development of RIN remains a noteworthy concern post-SRS of AVMs. While steroids aid with initial management of RIN, for persistent and recurrent symptoms, bevacizumab infusions serve as a viable treatment course, with the added benefit of reducing the likelihood of adverse effects resulting from prolonged steroid therapy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The surgical nature of radiation oncology should be better reflected in pre-residency training
    (Elsevier, 2019-08-17) McClelland, Shearwood; Brown, Simon A.; Ramirez-Fort, Marigdalia K.; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Zellars, Richard C.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine