Browsing by Author "Mansberger, Steven L."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinicians’ Use of Quantitative Information when Assessing the Rate of Functional Progression in Glaucoma
    (Elsevier, 2022) Gardiner, Stuart K.; Kinast, Robert M.; De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo; Budenz, Donald L.; Jeoung, Jin Wook; Lind, John T.; Myers, Jonathan S.; Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros; Rhodes, Lindsay A.; Strouthidis, Nicholas G.; Chen, Teresa C.; Mansberger, Steven L.; Ophthalmology, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Clinicians use both global and point-wise information from visual fields to assess the rate of glaucomatous functional progression. We asked which objective, quantitative measures best correlated with subjective assessment by glaucoma experts. In particular, we aimed to determine how much that judgment was based on localized rates of change vs. on global indices reported by the perimeter. Design: Prospective cohort study. Participants: Eleven academic, expert glaucoma specialists independently scored the rate of functional progression, from 1 (improvement) to 7 (very rapid progression), for a series of 5 biannual clinical printouts from 100 glaucoma or glaucoma suspect eyes of 51 participants, 20 of which were scored twice to assess repeatability. Methods: Regression models were used to predict the average of the 11 clinicians' scores based on objective rates of change of mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), pattern standard deviation (PSD), the Nth fastest progressing location, and the Nth fastest progressing of 10 anatomically defined clusters of locations after weighting by eccentricity. Main outcome measures: Correlation between the objective rates of change and the average of the 11 clinicians' scores. Results: The average MD of the study eyes was -2.4 dB (range, -16.8 to +2.8 dB). The mean clinician score was highly repeatable, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95. It correlated better with the rate of change of VFI (pseudo-R2 = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.60-0.83]) than with MD (pseudo-R2 = 0.63, 95% CI [0.45-0.76]) or PSD (pseudo-R2 = 0.41, 95% CI [0.26-0.55]). Using point-wise information, the highest correlations were found with the fifth-fastest progressing location (pseudo-R2 = 0.71, 95% CI [0.56-0.80]) and the fastest-progressing cluster after eccentricity weighting (pseudo-R2 = 0.61, 95% CI [0.48-0.72]). Among 25 eyes with an average VFI of > 99%, the highest observed pseudo-R2 value was 0.34 (95% CI [0.16-0.61]) for PSD. Conclusions: Expert academic glaucoma specialists' assessment of the rate of change correlated best with VFI rates, except in eyes with a VFI near the ceiling of 100%. Sensitivities averaged within clusters of locations have been shown to detect change sooner, but the experts' opinions correlated more closely with global VFI. This could be because it is currently the only index for which the perimeter automatically provides a quantitative estimate of the rate of functional progression.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinicians’ Use of Quantitative Information when Assessing the Rate of Structural Progression in Glaucoma
    (Elsevier, 2022) Gardiner, Stuart K.; Kinast, Robert M.; Chen, Teresa C.; Strouthidis, Nicholas G.; De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo; Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros; Myers, Jonathan S.; Jeoung, Jin Wook; Lind, John T.; Rhodes, Lindsay A.; Budenz, Donald L.; Mansberger, Steven L.; Ophthalmology, School of Medicine
    Purpose: OCT scans contain large amounts of information, but clinicians often rely on reported layer thicknesses when assessing the rate of glaucomatous progression. We sought to determine which of these quantifications most closely relate to the subjective assessment of glaucoma experts who had all the diagnostic information available. Design: Prospective cohort study. Participants: Eleven glaucoma specialists independently scored the rate of structural progression from a series of 5 biannual clinical OCT printouts. Methods: A total of 100 glaucoma or glaucoma suspect eyes of 51 participants were included; 20 were scored twice to assess repeatability. Scores ranged from 1 (improvement) to 7 (very rapid progression). Generalized estimating equation linear models were used to predict the mean clinician score from the rates of change of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) or minimum rim width (MRW) globally or in the most rapidly thinning of the 6 sectors. Main outcome measures: The correlation between the objective rates of change and the average of the 11 clinicians' scores. Results: Average RNFLT within the series of study eyes was 79.3 μm (range, 41.4-126.6). Some 95% of individual clinician scores varied by ≤ 1 point when repeated. The mean clinician score was more strongly correlated with the rate of change of RNFLT in the most rapidly changing sector in %/year (pseudo-R2 = 0.657) than the rate of global RNFLT (0.372). The rate of MRW in the most rapidly changing sector had pseudo-R2 = 0.149. Conclusions: The rate of change of RNFLT in the most rapidly changing sector predicted experts' assessment of the rate of structural progression better than global rates or MRW. Sectoral rates may be a useful addition to current clinical printouts.