- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Lund, Melvin"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item The effect of acid etching on remineralization of incipient caries lesions : a micro-ct study(2009) Yeslam, Hanin E.; Ando, Masatoshi; Gonzalez-Cabezas, Carlos, 1966-; Chu, Tien-Min Gabriel; Lund, Melvin; Cochran, MichaelEtching of enamel caries lesions has been demonstrated to enhance remineralization. However, this effect reaches a plateau after a period of time. This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of additional acid etching on remineralization. Forty 1 mm × 2 mm human enamel blocks with chemically induced artificial incipient lesions were used. Ten specimens were randomly selected at the end of demineralization for transverse microradiography (TMR) analysis. The remaining specimens were then divided into three groups (n = 10). Group A was remineralized by a pH cycling system with 1100 ppm sodium fluoride for 20 days. In group B, the specimens were etched with 35-percent phosphoric acid for 30 s and then remineralized. Group C was remineralized by same procedure as group B plus and given an additional acid etch after 10 days of remineralization. Mineral density was measured by x-ray microtomography (µ-CT). The volumetric mineral content [VM (µm3×105)] was determined between 91 and 0-wt%. The µ-CT % mineral recovery (%) was calculated using the formula 100×(remineralize VM - demineralization VM) / (sound VM - demineralization VM). One-hundred-μm sections of demineralized and remineralized specimens were used to assess the mineral loss (IML: vol%×µm) and lesion depth (µm) using TMR. The three groups showed no significant difference in mineral change or mineral content for µ-CT or TMR lesion depth. The TMR IML showed a significant difference between the demineralized specimens and the three remineralized groups. The correlation between TMR IML and TMR lesion depth was 0.66 (p < 0.0001). The µ-CT percent mineral recovery from demineralization was correlated with neither TMR IML nor TMR lesion depth. When evaluated with µ-CT, the twice-acid-etched group presented lower mineral gain values than the group etched only once with acid. Also, the twice-etched group presented lower mineral gain and greater TMR IML compared with the non-acid etch group. TMR images revealed reduction of surface layer in the acid-etched groups, especially in the twice-etched group, in which significant reduction or loss of surface layer occurred. Based on these results, we conclude that additional acid etching with 35-percent phosphoric acid does not enhance remineralization compared with a single application of acid etching. We believe that the viable existence of the surface layer is essential for remineralization of the lesion. Further investigations into the accuracy of µ-CT to detect minute mineral changes in incipient caries lesions are probably needed.Item Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials(MDPI, 2021-08-25) Labban, Nawaf; AlSheikh, Rasha; Lund, Melvin; Matis, Bruce A.; Moore, B. Keith; Cochran, Michael A.; Platt, Jeffrey A.; Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of DentistryObjective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement: Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement: FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W2 was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations: WSP (%) = (W1 - W2) × 100/W0 and WSL (%) = (W0 - W2) × 100/W0. Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey's multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Results: The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p < 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days. Conclusions: Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials.