ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Liu, Xuefeng"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association of pubovisceral muscle tear with functional capacity of urethral closure: evaluating maternal recovery from labor and delivery
    (Elsevier, 2020-06) Sheng, Ying; Liu, Xuefeng; Kane Low, Lisa; Ashton-Miller, James A.; Miller, Janis M.; School of Nursing
    Background Vaginal birth is a risk factor for pubovisceral muscle tear, decreased urethral closure pressure, and urinary incontinence. The relationship between these 3 factors is complicated. Urinary continence relies on maintaining urethral closure pressure, particularly when low urethral closure pressure can usefully be augmented by a volitional pelvic muscle (Kegel) contraction just before and during stress events like a cough. However, it is unknown whether a torn pubovisceral muscle decreases the ability to increase urethral closure during an attempted pelvic muscle contraction. Objective We tested the null hypothesis that a pubovisceral muscle tear does not affect the ability to increase urethral closure pressure during a volitional pelvic muscle contraction in the Evaluating Maternal Recovery from Labor and Delivery (EMRLD) study. Study Design We studied 56 women 8 months after their first vaginal birth. All had at least 1 risk factor for pubovisceral muscle tear (eg, forceps and long second stage). A tear was assessed bilaterally by magnetic resonance imaging. Urethral closure pressure was measured both at rest and during an attempted volitional pelvic muscle contraction. A Student t test was used to compare urethral closure pressures. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the effect of a magnetic resonance imaging–confirmed pubovisceral muscle tear on volitionally contracted urethral closure pressure after adjusting for resting urethral closure pressure. Results The mean age was just a little more than 30 years, with the majority being white. By magnetic resonance imaging measure, unadjusted for other factors, the 21 women with tear had significantly lower urethral closure pressure during an attempted contraction compared with the 35 women without tear (65.9 vs 86.8 cm H 2O, respectively, P = .004), leading us to reject the null hypothesis. No significant group difference was found in resting urethral closure pressure. After adjusting for resting urethral closure pressure, pubovisceral muscle tear was associated with lower urethral closure pressure (beta = –21.1, P = .001). Conclusion In the first postpartum year, the presence of a pubovisceral muscle tear did not influence resting urethral closure. However, women with a pubovisceral muscle tear achieved a 25% lower urethral closure pressure during an attempted pelvic muscle contraction than those without a pubovisceral muscle tear. These women with pubovisceral muscle tear may not respond to classic behavioral interventions, such as squeeze when you sneeze or strengthen through repetitive pelvic muscle exercises. When a rapid rise to maximum urethral pressure is used as a conscious volitional maneuver, it appears to be reliant on the ability to recruit the intact pubovisceral muscle to simultaneously contract the urethral striated muscle.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences
    (BMC, 2021-03-11) Li, Chang; Harris, Marcelline; Tsilimingras, Dennis; Liu, Sophia Z.; Sheng, Ying; Liu, Xuefeng; School of Nursing
    Background: Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is an anthropometric index associated with visceral adiposity. It remains unclear whether SAD and its socio-economic correlates differ in women and men, which limits the epidemiological and clinical applications of the SAD measurement. The aims of this study are to examine the sex differences in SAD and its socio-economic correlates. Methods: A complex stratified multistage clustered sampling design was used to select 6975 men and 7079 women aged 18 years or more from the National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey 2011-2016, representative of the US civilian non-institutionalized population. SAD was measured in accordance to the standard protocols using a two-arm abdominal caliper. The sex differences in SAD and its socio-economic correlates were evaluated by performing weighted independent t tests and weighted multiple regression. Results: SAD was lower in women than in men in the entire sample, as well as in all the subgroups characterized by age, race, birth place, household income, and body mass index except for non-Hispanic blacks and those with household income < $20,000. Adjusted for other characteristics, age, birth place, household income, and body mass index were associated with SAD in both women and men. Black women were associated with higher SAD then white women (p < .0001), and Hispanic and Asian men were associated with lower SAD than white men (both p < .01). Women born in other countries were more likely to have lower SAD than women born in the US (p < .0001), and so were men (p = .0118). Both women and men with a household income of <$75,000 had higher SAD than those with an income of over $75,000. The associations of age, race, and household income with SAD differed in women and men. Conclusion: SAD is lower in women than in men, in the general population as well as in the most socio-economic subgroups. While socio-economic correlates of SAD are similar in women and men, the associations of age, race, and household income with SAD vary across sex.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University