IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks :: Browsing by Author "Litzelman, Debra K."

Browsing by Author "Litzelman, Debra K."

Now showing 1 - 10 of 28

A framework for reinitiating global academic exchange in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
(IJME, 2022-09-09) Kelly, Caitrin M.; Some, Fatma; Guiles, Daniel A.; Turissini, Matthew; Gardner, Adrian; Litzelman, Debra K.; Medicine, School of Medicine
A Global Health Reciprocal Innovation grant programme: 5-year review with lessons learnt
(BMJ Publishing, 2023) Ruhl, Laura J.; Kiplagat, Jepchirchir; O'Brien, Rishika; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Scanlon, Michael; Plater, David; Thomas, Melissa R.; Pastakia, Sonak; Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi; Morales-Soto, Nydia; Nyandiko, Winstone; Vreeman, Rachel C.; Litzelman, Debra K.; Laktabai, Jeremiah; Medicine, School of Medicine
Unilateral approaches to global health innovations can be transformed into cocreative, uniquely collaborative relationships between low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HIC), constituted as 'reciprocal innovation' (RI). Since 2018, the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI) and Indiana University (IU) Center for Global Health Equity have led a grants programme sculpted from the core elements of RI, a concept informed by a 30-year partnership started between IU (Indiana) and Moi University (Kenya), which leverages knowledge sharing, transformational learning and translational innovations to address shared health challenges. In this paper, we describe the evolution and implementation of an RI grants programme, as well as the challenges faced. We aim to share the successes of our RI engagement and encourage further funding opportunities to promote innovations grounded in the RI core elements. From the complex series of challenges encountered, three major lessons have been learnt: dedicating extensive time and resources to bring different settings together; establishing local linkages across investigators; and addressing longstanding inequities in global health research. We describe our efforts to address these challenges through educational materials and an online library of resources for RI projects. Using perspectives from RI investigators funded by this programme, we offer future directions resulting from our 5-year experience in applying this RI-focused approach. As the understanding and implementation of RI grow, global health investigators can share resources, knowledge and innovations that have the potential to significantly change the face of collaborative international research and address long-standing health inequities across diverse settings.
Career choices and global health engagement: 24-year follow-up of U.S. participants in the Indiana University-Moi University elective
(Elsevier, 2015-12) Umoren, Rachel A.; Gardner, Adrian; Stone, Geren S.; Helphinstine, Jill; Machogu, Emily P.; Huskins, Jordan C.; Johnson, Cynthia S.; Ayuo, Paul O.; Mining, Simeon; Litzelman, Debra K.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
Background Global health experiences evoke a profound awareness of cultural differences, inspire learners to prioritize professional values, and provide a lens for addressing global health care challenges. This study compares the long-term career and practice choices of participants in a 2-month Indiana University-Moi University, Kenya elective from 1989–2013 with those of a control group. Methods Global health elective (GHE) participants and a random sample of alumni without GHE experience were surveyed on their clinical practice, public health and global health activities. Results Responses from 176 former participants were compared with a control group of 177 alumni. GHE participants were more likely than similar controls to provide care to underserved U.S. populations (p=0.037), spend time in global health, public health, and public policy activities (p=0.005) and be involved in global health advocacy (p=0.001). Using multivariable analysis, GHE participants were more likely to be generalists (p<0.05), report that healthcare costs influenced medical decision-making (p<0.05), and provide healthcare outside the U.S. for ≥1 week/year (p<0.001). Conclusions Many years out of training, GHE participants were more likely to be generalists working with underserved populations, to be cost-conscious in their healthcare decision-making, and to be involved in global health, public health or public policy. Implications With the primary care provider shortage and need for greater awareness among providers of healthcare costs, our study shows that that global health experiences may yield broader benefits to the U.S. medical system.
Clarifying Values and Preferences for Care Near the End of Life: The Role of a New Lay Workforce
(Springer Nature, 2017-10) Litzelman, Debra K.; Inui, Thomas S.; Schmitt-Wendholt, Kathleen M.; Perkins, Anthony; Griffin, Wilma J.; Cottingham, Ann H.; Ivy, Steven S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
Community health workers (CHWs) can engage elderly persons in advance care planning (ACP) conversations. We report how trained CHWs used Go Wish cards (GW R cards) to identify patients' highest priority preferences and evaluated whether engaging in ACP conversations was associated with subsequent health care utilization. A one-year long, pre-post longitudinal design was used to evaluate our educational intervention using mixed-methods. 392 patients (mean of 73.3 years, 82% women, 48% African American, 43% Caucasian) enrolled in the Aging Brain Care (ABC) program and participated in ACP discussions with CHWs. We expanded the role of the ABC's CHW, who work directly with individuals and caregivers during home visits to monitor bio-psycho-social needs, to include ACP conversations. The CHWs received ACP training, practice with tools such as GW R cards, and support from an electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support tool. Quantitative measures of patients' ACP preferences and health care utilization were abstracted from the EHR. Qualitative data about patients' perceptions of CHWs in facilitating ACP discussions was obtained through semi-structured interviews. Eighty-six patients' data indicated that they had engaged in a preferences-for-care process using GW R cards. The top-three card choices by patients was attending to spirituality and religious concerns, preparing for end of life, and maintaining personal wholeness. CHWs were able to effectively engage in ACP conversations with patients and GW R cards were a positive way to stimulate discussion of issues previously undiscussed.
Combined interprofessional education and system intervention to improve screening older adults for dementia and falls
(Taylor & Francis, 2021) Litzelman, Debra K.; Butler, Dawn E.; Iloabuchi, Tochukwu; Frank, Kathryn I.; Bo, Na; Tong, Yan; Garrison, Emilie; Roth, Sarah; Vannerson, Julie; Medicine, School of Medicine
The objective of this study was to increase screening for falls and dementia by improving interprofessional (IP) providers’ and staffs’ knowledge and attitudes toward the care of older patients and team-based care. An intervention, including education about screening and an electronic health record (EHR) flowsheet, was rolled-out across eight Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC). Participants were 262 IP health providers who served 6670 patients ≥ age 65 > age 65 . An EHR flowsheet with two-item screeners for falls and dementia triggered automatically for patients ≥ age 65. Documentation of screening for falls and dementia was abstracted from the EHR for the year prior to and the year after the interventions began. Baseline screening rates for falls and dementia were flat; from the start of education intervention until EHR live date, screening rates increased significantly; after EHR live date, the screening rates continued increasing significantly. A combined education-system intervention can improve screening for falls and dementia in FQHC.
Correction: [On Becoming a Global Citizen: Transformative Learning Through Global Health Experiences]
(Ubiquity Press, 2021-03-16) Litzelman, Debra K.; Gardner, Adrian; Einterz, Robert M.; Owiti, Philip; Wambui, Charity; Huskins, Jordan C.; Schmitt-Wendholt, Kathleen M.; Stone, Geren S.; Ayuo, Paul O.; Inui, Thomas S.; Cottingham, Ann H.; Umoren, Rachel A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.07.005.].
Development and use of an instrument adapted to assess the clinical skills learning environment in the pre-clinical years
(Springer, 2015-09) Rdesinski, Rebecca E.; Chappelle, Kathryn G.; Elliot, Diane L.; Litzelman, Debra K.; Palmer, Ryan; Biagioli, Frances E.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
BACKGROUND: The Communication, Curriculum, and Culture (C3) instrument is a well-established survey for measuring the professional learning climate or hidden curriculum in the clinical years of medical school. However, few instruments exist for assessing professionalism in the pre-clinical years. We adapted the C3 instrument and assessed its utility during the pre-clinical years at two U.S. medical schools. METHODS: The ten-item Pre-Clinical C3 survey was adapted from the C3 instrument. Surveys were administered at the conclusion of the first and second years of medical school using a repeated cross-sectional design. Factor analysis was performed and Cronbach's alphas were calculated for emerging dimensions. RESULTS: The authors collected 458 and 564 surveys at two medical schools during AY06-07 and AY07-09 years, respectively. Factor analysis of the survey data revealed nine items in three dimensions: "Patients as Objects", "Talking Respectfully of Colleagues", and "Patient-Centered Behaviors". Reliability measures (Cronbach's alpha) for the Pre-Clinical C3 survey data were similar to those of the C3 survey for comparable dimensions for each school. Gender analysis revealed significant differences in all three dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The Pre-Clinical C3 instrument's performance was similar to the C3 instrument in measuring dimensions of professionalism. As medical education moves toward earlier and more frequent clinical and inter-professional educational experiences, the Pre-Clinical C3 instrument may be especially useful in evaluating the impact of curricular revisions.
Enhancing the Prospects for Palliative Care at the End of Life: A Statewide Educational Demonstration Project to Improve Advance Care Planning
(Cambridge, 2016-12) Litzelman, Debra K.; Cottingham, Ann H.; Griffin, Wilma; Inui, Thomas S.; Ivy, Steven S.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
Although patients want to participate in discussions and decisions about their end-of-life care, studies show that providers frequently fail to invite them to explore advanced care preferences or goals for living. The purpose of our demonstration project was to provide education and coaching to individuals, health providers, and organizations across the state of Indiana intended to facilitate these conversations, documenting and honoring individuals' life goals and preferences for care during the final stages of life. Education and training engaged community members as well as healthcare providers to: (1) improve participant comfort and facility discussing end-of-life issues; (2) improve knowledge of healthcare choices, including palliative and hospice care; and (3) prepare all participants to explore and document personal values, life goals, and priorities as well as goals of care. Between January of 2013 and June of 2015, the team educated close to 5,000 participants. Participants' ratings of the quality and perceived usefulness of the educational events ranged from 4 to 5 (using a 5-point scale, with 5 = most effective). Participant comments were overwhelmingly favorable and indicated an intention to put the advance care planning resources, communication skills, knowledge of palliative and hospice care, and personal renewal techniques into practice. Participant motivation to foster advance care planning, discussions of palliative care, and end-of-life conversations was facilitated by the reframing of these conversations as identifying goals of care and priorities for living well during an important stage of life. Successful strategies included helping providers and patients to adopt a broader meaning for “sustaining hope” (not for cure, but for engaging in highly valued activities), developing provider communication skills and comfort in initiating potentially difficult discussions, engaging a new community health workforce who will develop trusting relationships with patients in home-based services, and fostering self-awareness and self-care among palliative care providers.
Evaluation of interprofessional relational coordination and patients’ perception of care in outpatient oncology teams
(Taylor & Francis, 2017) Azar, Jose M.; Johnson, Cynthia S.; Frame, Amie M.; Perkins, Susan M.; Cottingham, Ann H.; Litzelman, Debra K.; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine
This pilot study was designed to measure teamwork and the relationship of teamwork to patient perceptions of care among 63 members of 12 oncology teams at a Cancer Centre in the Midwest. Lack of teamwork in cancer care can result in serious clinical errors, fragmentation of care, and poor quality of care. Many oncology team members, highly skilled in clinical care, are not trained to work effectively as members of a care team. The research team administered the Relational Coordination survey to core oncology team members—medical oncologists, nurse coordinators, and clinical secretaries—to measure seven dimensions of team skills (four relating to communication [frequency, timeliness, accuracy, and problem solving] and three relating to relationship [shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect]) averaged to create a Relational Coordination Index. The results indicated that among the team member roles, nurse coordinator relational coordination indices were the strongest and most positively correlated with patient perception of care. Statistically significant correlations were intra-nurse coordinator relational coordination indices and two patient perception of care factors (information and education and patient’s preferences). All other nurse coordinator intra-role as well as inter-role correlations were also positively correlated, although not statistically significant.
Fostering reciprocity in global health partnerships through a structured, hands-on experience for visiting postgraduate medical trainees
(Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2014-06) Umoren, Rachel A.; Einterz, Robert M.; Litzelman, Debra K.; Pettigrew, Ronald K.; Ayaya, Samuel O.; Liechty, Edward A.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
BACKGROUND: Global health programs that allow international experiences for US learners should also enable reciprocal learning experiences for international learners, particularly if that is a need identified by the partner institution. METHODS: A partnership between Indiana University and Moi University, Kenya, has successfully hosted 41 visiting Kenyan internal medicine and pediatrics registrars at Indiana University since 2006. The program's logistics, curriculum, and evaluation are described. RESULTS: The registrars rotated through nephrology, cardiology, hematology and oncology, infectious diseases, and intensive care, as well as related ambulatory experiences, functioning on a level comparable to fourth-year medical students. They showed significant improvement in pretest and posttest scores on a standardized National Board of Medical Examiners examination (P = .048). International learners experienced culture shock, yet they felt the Indiana University elective was helpful and would recommend it to future participants. CONCLUSIONS: Global health programs can reciprocate the benefits derived for US students and residents by offering learning experiences to international learners if that is an expressed need from the international partner. Barriers to those experiences can be overcome, and the hands-on, elective experience has the potential to positively affect the knowledge and attitudes of participants as well as the home nation.

Browsing by Author "Litzelman, Debra K."

Results Per Page

Sort Options