Browsing by Author "Liebeskind, David S."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Quantifying the amount of greater brain ischemia protection time with pre-hospital vs. in-hospital neuroprotective agent start
    (Frontiers Media, 2022) Matossian, Vartan; Starkman, Sidney; Sanossian, Nerses; Stratton, Samuel; Eckstein, Marc; Conwit, Robin; Liebeskind, David S.; Sharma, Latisha; Tenser, May-Kim; Saver, Jeffrey L.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    The objective of this study is to quantify the increase in brain-under-protection time that may be achieved with pre-hospital compared with the post-arrival start of neuroprotective therapy among patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. In order to do this, a comparative analysis was performed of two randomized trials of neuroprotective agents: (1) pre-hospital strategy: Field administration of stroke therapy-magnesium (FAST-MAG) Trial; (2) in-hospital strategy: Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) Trial. In the FAST-MAG trial, among 1,041 acute ischemic stroke patients, 44 were treated with endovascular reperfusion therapy (ERT), including 32 treated with both intravenous thrombolysis and ERT and 12 treated with ERT alone. In the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, among 1,105 acute ischemic stroke patients, 659 were treated with both intravenous thrombolysis and ERT, and 446 were treated with ERT alone. The start of the neuroprotective agent was sooner after onset with pre-hospital vs. in-hospital start: 45 m (IQR 38-56) vs. 122 m. The neuroprotective agent in FAST-MAG was started 8 min prior to ED arrival compared with 64 min after arrival in ESCAPE-NA1. Projecting modern endovascular workflows to FAST-MAG, the total time of "brain under protection" (neuroprotective agent start to reperfusion) was greater with pre-hospital than in-hospital start: 94 m (IQR 90-98) vs. 22 m. Initiating a neuroprotective agent in the pre-hospital setting enables a faster treatment start, yielding 72 min additional brain protection time for patients with acute ischemic stroke. These findings provide support for the increased performance of ambulance-based, pre-hospital treatment trials in the development of neuroprotective stroke therapies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale is comparable to the ICH score in predicting outcomes in spontaneous acute intracerebral hemorrhage
    (Frontiers Media, 2024-07-01) Kazaryan, Suzie A.; Shkirkova, Kristina; Saver, Jeffrey L.; Liebeskind, David S.; Starkman, Sidney; Bulic, Sebina; Poblete, Roy; Kim-Tenser, May; Guo, Shujing; Conwit, Robin; Villablanca, Pablo; Hamilton, Scott; Sanossian, Nerses; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Validating the National Institutes of Health NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) as a tool to assess deficit severity and prognosis in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage would harmonize the assessment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, enable clinical use of a readily implementable and non-imaging dependent prognostic tool, and improve monitoring of ICH care quality in administrative datasets. Methods: Among randomized trial ICH patients, the relation between NIHSS scores early after Emergency Department arrival and 3-month outcomes of dependency or death (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 3-6) and case fatality was examined. NIHSS predictive performance was compared to a current standard prognostic scale, the intracerebral hemorrhage score (ICH score). Results: Among the 384 patients, the mean age was 65 (±13), with 66% being male. The median NIHSS score was 16 (interquartile range (IQR) 9-25), the mean initial hematoma volume was 29 mL (±38), and the ICH score median was 1 (IQR 0-2). At 3 months, the mRS had a median of 4 (IQR 2-6), with dependency or death occurring in 70% and case fatality in 26%. The NIHSS and ICH scores were strongly correlated (r = 0.73), and each was strongly correlated with the 90-day mRS (NIHSS, r = 0.61; ICH score, r = 0.62). The NIHSS performed comparably to the ICH score in predicting both dependency or death (c = 0.80 vs. 0.80, p = 0.83) and case fatality (c = 0.78 vs. 0.80, p = 0.29). At threshold values, the NIHSS predicted dependency or death with 74.1% accuracy (NIHSS 17.5) and case fatality with 75.0% accuracy (NIHSS 18.5). Conclusion: The NIHSS forecasts 3-month functional and case fatality outcomes with accuracy comparable to the ICH Score. Widely documented in routine clinical care and administrative data, the NIHSS can serve as a valuable measure for clinical prognostication, therapy development, and case-mix risk adjustment in ICH patients.