Browsing by Author "Lewis, Cara C."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Alliances to disseminate addiction prevention and treatment (ADAPT): A statewide learning health system to reduce substance use among justice-involved youth in rural communities
    (Elsevier, 2021) Aalsma, Matthew C.; Aarons, Gregory A.; Adams, Zachary W.; Alton, Madison D.; Boustani, Malaz; Dir, Allyson L.; Embi, Peter J.; Grannis, Shaun; Hulvershorn, Leslie A.; Huntsinger, Douglas; Lewis, Cara C.; Monahan, Patrick; Saldana, Lisa; Schwartz, Katherine; Simon, Kosali I.; Terry, Nicolas; Wiehe, Sarah E.; Zapolski, Tamika C. B.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Youth in the justice system (YJS) are more likely than youth who have never been arrested to have mental health and substance use problems. However, a low percentage of YJS receive SUD services during their justice system involvement. The SUD care cascade can identify potential missed opportunities for treatment for YJS. Steps along the continuum of the cascade include identification of treatment need, referral to services, and treatment engagement. To address gaps in care for YJS, we will (1) implement a learning health system (LHS) to develop, or improve upon, alliances between juvenile justice (JJ) agencies and community mental health centers (CMHC) and (2) present local cascade data during continuous quality improvement cycles within the LHS alliances. Methods/design: ADAPT is a hybrid Type II effectiveness implementation trial. We will collaborate with JJ and CMHCs in eight Indiana counties. Application of the EPIS (exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment) framework will guide the implementation of the LHS alliances. The study team will review local cascade data quarterly with the alliances to identify gaps along the continuum. The study will collect self-report survey measures longitudinally at each site regarding readiness for change, implementation climate, organizational leadership, and program sustainability. The study will use the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) tool to assess the process of implementation across interventions. Additionally, the study team will conduct focus groups and qualitative interviews with JJ and CMHC personnel across the intervention period to assess for impact. Discussion: Findings have the potential to increase SUD need identification, referral to services, and treatment for YJS.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Implementing measurement-based care (iMBC) for depression in community mental health: a dynamic cluster randomized trial study protocol
    (Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.), 2015) Lewis, Cara C.; Scott, Kelli; Marti, C. Nathan; Marriott, Brigid R.; Kroenke, Kurt; Putz, John W.; Mendel, Peter; Rutkowski, David; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Measurement-based care is an evidence-based practice for depression that efficiently identifies treatment non-responders and those who might otherwise deteriorate [1]. However, measurement-based care is underutilized in community mental health with data suggesting fewer than 20 % of behavioral health providers using this practice to inform treatment. It remains unclear whether standardized or tailored approaches to implementation are needed to optimize measurement-based care fidelity and penetration. Moreover, there is some suggestion that prospectively tailored interventions that are designed to fit the dynamic context may optimize public health impact, though no randomized trials have yet tested this notion [2]. This study will address the following three aims: (1) To compare the effect of standardized versus tailored MBC implementation on clinician-level and client-level outcomes; (2) To identify contextual mediators of MBC fidelity; and (3) To explore the impact of MBC fidelity on client outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a dynamic cluster randomized trial of standardized versus tailored measurement-based care implementation in Centerstone, the largest provider of community-based mental health services in the USA. This prospective, mixed methods implementation-effectiveness hybrid design allows for evaluation of the two conditions on both clinician-level (e.g., MBC fidelity) and client-level (depression symptom change) outcomes. Central to this investigation is the focus on identifying contextual factors (e.g., attitudes, resources, process, etc.) that mediate MBC fidelity and optimize client outcomes. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute generalizable and practical strategies for implementing systematic symptom monitoring to inform and enhance behavioral healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02266134 .
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Taking a Magnifying Glass to Measurement-Based Care Consultation Sessions: with What Issues Do Mental Health Clinicians Struggle?
    (Springer, 2023) Marriott, Brigid R.; Walker, Madison R.; Howard, Jacqueline; Puspitasari, Ajeng; Scott, Kelli; Albright, Karen; Lewis, Cara C.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Ongoing consultation following initial training is one of the most commonly deployed implementation strategies to facilitate uptake of evidence-based practices, such as measurement-based care (MBC). Group consultation provides an interactive experience with an expert and colleagues to get feedback on actual issues faced, yet there is little research that unpacks the questions raised in consultation and what types of issues are important to address. Methods: The current study characterized the questions and concerns raised by community mental health clinicians (N = 38 across six clinics) during group consultation sessions completed as part of an MBC implementation trial. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of consultation forms completed by clinicians before each MBC consultation session. Results: Clinicians sought MBC consultation for clients across a range of ages and levels of depression severity. Qualitative results revealed five main questions and concerns in consultation sessions: (1) how to administer the PHQ-9, (2) how to review PHQ-9 scores, (3) how to respond to PHQ-9 score, (4) the types of clients for whom MBC would be appropriate, and (5) how MBC could impact a clinician's usual care. Conclusion: Findings highlight the need for ongoing consultation and limitations of workshop training alone. Practical recommendations for addressing the common questions and concerns identified are presented to support MBC use.