Browsing by Author "Lee, Lawrence S."

Now showing 1 - 10 of 14
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Combined epicardial and endocardial ablation for atrial fibrillation: Best practices and guide to hybrid convergent procedures
    (Elsevier, 2021) Makati, Kevin J.; Sood, Nitesh; Lee, Lawrence S.; Yang, Felix; Shults, Christian C.; DeLurgio, David B.; Melichercik, Juraj; Gill, Jaswinder S.; Kaba, Riyaz A.; Ahsan, Syed; Weerasooriya, Rukshen; Joshi, Pragnesh; Lellouche, Nicolas; Blaauw, Yuri; Zannis, Konstantinos; Sebag, Frederic A.; Gauri, Andre; Zembala, Michael O.; Tondo, Claudio; Steinberg, Jonathan S.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    The absence of strategies to consistently and effectively address nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation by nonpharmacological interventions has represented a long-standing treatment gap. A combined epicardial/endocardial ablation strategy, the hybrid Convergent procedure, was developed in response to this clinical need. A subxiphoid incision is used to access the pericardial space facilitating an epicardial ablation directed at isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium. This is followed by an endocardial ablation to complete isolation of the pulmonary veins and for additional ablation as needed. Experience gained with the hybrid Convergent procedure during the last decade has led to the development and adoption of strategies to optimize the technique and mitigate risks. Additionally, a surgical and electrophysiology "team" approach including comprehensive training is believed critical to successfully develop the hybrid Convergent program. A recently completed randomized clinical trial indicated that this ablation strategy is superior to an endocardial-only approach for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. In this review, we propose and describe best practice guidelines for hybrid Convergent ablation on the basis of a combination of published data, author consensus, and expert opinion. A summary of clinical outcomes, emerging evidence, and future perspectives is also given.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Current Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    (AME Publishing Company, 2020) Martinez Licha, Carlos R.; McCurdy, Chelsea M.; Maldonado, Sarina Masso; Lee, Lawrence S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and requires prompt diagnosis and management. While non-surgical approaches have supplanted surgery as primary treatment, surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) remains a vital option for select patients. We review the current management of acute PE, with a focus on surgical therapy. Methods: A PubMed search was performed to identify literature regarding PE and treatment. Results were filtered to include the most comprehensive publications over the past decade. Results: PE is stratified based on presenting hemodynamic status or degree of mechanical pulmonary arterial occlusion. Although systemic or catheter-guided fibrinolysis is the preferred first-line treatment for the majority of cases, patients who are not candidates should be considered for SPE. Studies demonstrate no mortality benefit of thrombolysis over surgery. Systemic anticoagulation is a mainstay of treatment regardless of intervention approach. Following surgical embolectomy, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been shown to reduce recurrence of thromboembolism. Conclusions: Acute PE presents with varying degrees of clinical stability. Patients should be evaluated in the context of various available treatment options including medical, catheter-based, and surgical interventions. SPE is a safe and appropriate treatment option for appropriate patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Eleven-Year Experience Treating Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury at a Tertiary Referral Center
    (Elsevier, 2020) McCurdy, Chelsea M.; Faiza, Zainab; Namburi, Niharika; Hartman, Timothy J.; Corvera, Joel S.; Jenkins, Peter; Timsina, Lava R.; Lee, Lawrence S.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background Blunt thoracic aortic injury treatment has evolved over the past decade particularly with respect to endovascular intervention options. We investigated the trends in blunt thoracic aortic injury management and outcomes over an 11-year span at the sole tertiary referral center in our state. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who presented to our institution with blunt traumatic aortic injury between 2007 and 2017. Baseline demographics including aortic injury grade, injury severity score, and abbreviated injury scale were collected. Outcomes were compared by type and timing of treatment, which included either nonoperative management, endovascular repair, or open surgical repair. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to examine treatment group differences and factors associated with 30-day mortality. Results In total, 229 patients were reviewed. The distribution of injury severity was grade 1 (30%), grade 2 (8%), grade 3 (30%), and grade 4 (31%). Overall, 27% of patients underwent endovascular repair, 29% open surgery, and 44% definitive nonoperative management. Over the study period, there was a dramatic decline in open surgery and a corresponding rise in endovascular treatment. Thirty-day mortality for the entire cohort was 22%. Mortality by treatment subgroup was 30% for nonoperative management, 8.2% for endovascular treatment, and 21% for open surgery. Delaying endovascular or open surgical treatment by at least 24 hours after admission was associated with significantly improved 30-day survival. Conclusions Procedural intervention, whether endovascular or surgical, is associated with improved mortality compared with nonoperative treatment. Delayed intervention, particularly in the case of high-grade injuries, may allow for initial patient stabilization and improved outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Emergent Nexus between Striae and Thoracic Aortic Dissection
    (MDPI, 2021) Landis, Benjamin J.; Vujakovich, Courtney E.; Elmore, Lindsey R.; Pillai, Saila T.; Lee, Lawrence S.; Everett, Jeffrey E.; Markham, Larry W.; Brown, John W.; Hess, Phillip J.; Corvera, Joel S.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Current approaches to stratify the risk for disease progression in thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) lack precision, which hinders clinical decision making. Connective tissue phenotyping of children with TAA previously identified the association between skin striae and increased rate of aortic dilation. The objective of this study was to analyze associations between connective tissue abnormalities and clinical endpoints in adults with aortopathy. Participants with TAA or aortic dissection (TAD) and trileaflet aortic valve were enrolled from 2016 to 2019 in the setting of cardiothoracic surgical care. Data were ascertained by structured interviews with participants. The mean age among 241 cases was 61 ± 13 years. Eighty (33%) had history of TAD. While most participants lacked a formal syndromic diagnosis clinically, connective tissue abnormalities were identified in 113 (47%). This included 20% with abdominal hernia and 13% with skin striae in atypical location. In multivariate analysis, striae and hypertension were significantly associated with TAD. Striae were associated with younger age of TAD or prophylactic aortic surgery. Striae were more frequent in TAD cases than age- and sex-matched controls. Thus, systemic features of connective tissue dysfunction were prevalent in adults with aortopathy. The emerging nexus between striae and aortopathy severity creates opportunities for clinical stratification and basic research.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery protocol reduces perioperative opioid use
    (Elsevier, 2022-09-06) Loria, Chelsea M.; Zborek, Kirsten; Millward, James B.; Anderson, Matthew P.; Richardson, Cynthia M.; Namburi, Niharika; Faiza, Zainab; Timsina, Lava R.; Lee, Lawrence S.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Objective: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols are relatively new in cardiac surgery. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery addresses perioperative analgesia by implementing multimodal pain control regimens that include both opioid and nonopioid components. We investigated the effects of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol at our institution on postoperative outcomes with particular focus on analgesia. Methods: Single-center retrospective study comparing perioperative opioid use before and after implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol at our institution. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (study group from year 2020) and pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (control group from year 2018). Baseline and perioperative variables including total opioid use from the day of surgery to postoperative day 5 were collected. Opioid use was calculated as morphine milligram equivalents and compared between the 2 cohorts. Results: A total of 466 patients were included: 250 in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group and 216 in the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, but the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group had significantly more subjects with intravenous drug use history (P < .0001), endocarditis (P < .0001), and liver disease (P = .007) compared with the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group. Every day from the day of surgery to postoperative day 5, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group had significant reduction (57%) in opioid use compared with the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group. Total opioid use for the entire length of stay was 259 morphine milligram equivalents in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group versus 452 morphine milligram equivalents in the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group (P < .0001). Subgroup analysis of subjects with intravenous drug use history did not demonstrate a significant reduction in opioid use. Conclusions: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols with an emphasis on multimodal pain management throughout perioperative care are associated with a significant reduction in the postoperative use of opioid analgesics.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Fifteen-year experience with pericardiectomy at a tertiary referral center
    (BMC, 2021-06-22) Faiza, Zainab; Prakash, Anjali; Namburi, Niharika; Johnson, Bailey; Timsina, Lava; Lee, Lawrence S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Pericardiectomy has traditionally carried relatively high perioperative mortality and morbidity, with few published reports of intermediate- and long- term outcomes. We investigated our 15-year experience performing pericardiectomy at our institution. Methods: Retrospective study of all patients who underwent pericardiectomy at our institution between 2005 and 2019. Baseline demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes including long-term survival were analyzed. Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the study. 66.7% of subjects underwent isolated pericardiectomy while 33.3% underwent pericardiectomy concomitantly with another cardiac surgical procedure. The most common indications for pericardiectomy were constrictive (79.4%) and hemorrhagic (9.5%) pericarditis. Preoperatively, 76.2% of patients were New York Heart Association class II and III, while postoperatively, 71.4% were class I and II. One-, three-, five-, and ten- year overall mortality was 9.5, 14.3, 20.6, and 25.4%, respectively. Overall pericarditis recurrence rate was 4.8%. Conclusion: Pericardiectomy carries relatively high overall mortality rates, which likely reflects underlying disease etiology and comorbidities. Patients with prior cardiac intervention, history of dialysis, and immunocompromised state are associated with worse outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of time between diagnosis to treatment in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection
    (Springer Nature, 2021-02-10) Matthews, Caleb R.; Madison, Mackenzie; Timsina, Lava R.; Namburi, Niharika; Faiza, Zainab; Lee, Lawrence S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    There is a paucity of data describing the effect of time interval between diagnosis and surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. We describe our 8-year experience and investigate the impact of time interval between symptom onset, diagnosis and surgery on outcomes. Retrospective single-center study utilizing our Society of Thoracic Surgeons registry and patient records. Subjects were grouped by time interval between radiographic diagnosis and surgical treatment: Group A (0–4 h), Group B (4.1–8 h), Group C (8.1–12 h), and Group D (12.1 + h). Data were analyzed to identify factors associated with mortality and outcomes. 164 patients were included. Overall mortality was 21.3%. Group C had the greatest intervals between symptom onset to diagnosis to surgery, and also the highest mortality (66.7%). Preoperative tamponade, cardiac arrest, malperfusion, elevated creatinine, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and blood transfusions were associated with increased mortality, while distance of referring hospital was not. Time intervals between symptom onset, diagnosis and surgery have a significant effect on mortality. Surgery performed 8–12 h after diagnosis carries the highest mortality, which may be exacerbated by longer interval since symptom onset. Time-dependent effects should be considered when determining optimal strategy especially if inter-facility transfer is necessary.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intracardiac extension of chondroblastic osteosarcoma
    (Oxford University Press, 2021) Madison, Mackenzie K.; Matthews, Caleb R.; Lee, Lawrence S.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Intravascular tumour extension invading the intracardiac space is rarely seen with osteosarcoma. We present a patient with a history of previously resected pelvic osteosarcoma who was later found to have a local recurrence with continuous intravascular extension from the right femoral vein to the right atrium. Preoperative imaging studies initially described extensive thrombus burden, and a multidisciplinary approach involving open and percutaneous thrombectomy was planned. Intraoperative inspection and pathological analysis revealed unresectable malignant solid tumour rather than thrombus. Though exceedingly rare, the possibility of metastatic tumour must be considered when planning treatment strategies for these patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization performed pre-solid abdominal organ transplant
    (Elsevier, 2020) Matthews, Caleb R.; Millward, James B.; Faiza, Zainab; Namburi, Niharika; Timsina, Lava; Hess, Philip J.; Corvera, Joel S.; Everett, Jeffrey E.; Beckman, Daniel J.; Lee, Lawrence S.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background Cardiac risk stratification and coronary angiography are routinely performed as part of kidney and liver transplant candidacy evaluation. There are limited data on the outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization in this patient population. We investigated outcomes in patients with end stage renal or hepatic disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to attain kidney or liver transplant candidacy. Methods Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent isolated CABG at our institution between 2010 and 2016. Patients were divided into two cohorts: Pre-transplant (those undergoing surgery to attain renal or hepatic transplant candidacy) and Non-transplant (all others). Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 1801 patients were included: 28 in Pre-transplant (n=22 kidney, n=7 liver) and 1773 in Non-transplant. Major adverse postoperative outcomes were significantly greater in Pre-transplant compared to Non-transplant: 30-day mortality (14.3% vs. 2.8%, p=0.009), neurologic events (17.9% vs. 4.8%, p=0.011), re-intubation (21.4% vs. 5.8%, p=0.005) and total postoperative ventilation (5.2 vs. 5.0 hours, p=0.0124). One- and five-year mortality in Pre-transplant was 17.9% and 53.6%, respectively. Of the Pre-transplant cohort, three patients (10.7%) underwent organ transplantation (all kidneys) at a mean 436 days after CABG. No patients received liver transplantation. Conclusions Outcomes following CABG in the pre-kidney and pre-liver transplant population are poor. Despite surgical revascularization, the vast majority of patients do not ultimately undergo transplantation. Revascularization strategies and optimal management in this high-risk population warrants further study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Preoperative stroke before cardiac surgery does not increase risk of postoperative stroke
    (Springer Nature, 2021-04-27) Matthews, Caleb R.; Hartman, Timothy; Madison, Mackenzie; Villelli, Nicolas W.; Namburi, Niharika; Colgate, Cameron L.; Faiza, Zainab; Lee, Lawrence S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The optimal time when surgery can be safely performed after stroke is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate how cardiac surgery timing after stroke impacts postoperative outcomes between 2011–2017 were reviewed. Variables were extracted from the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, statewide patient registry, and medical records. Subjects were classified based upon presence of endocarditis and further grouped by timing of preoperative stroke relative to cardiac surgery: Recent (stroke within two weeks before surgery), Intermediate (between two and six weeks before), and Remote (greater than six weeks before). Postoperative outcomes were compared amongst groups. 157 patients were included: 54 in endocarditis and 103 in non-endocarditis, with 47 in Recent, 26 in Intermediate, and 84 in Remote. 30-day mortality and postoperative stroke rate were similar across the three subgroups for both endocarditis and non-endocarditis. Of patients with postoperative stroke, mortality was 30% (95% CI 4.6–66). Timing of cardiac surgery after stroke occurrence does not seem to affect postoperative stroke or mortality. If postoperative stroke does occur, subsequent stroke-related mortality is high.