Browsing by Author "Lee, Jason T. C."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    177. Prophylactic Absorbable Antibiotic Beads For High Risk Implant-based Reconstruction: A Single Institution Pilot Study
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2023-05-19) Ahmed, Shahnur; Lee, Jason T. C.; Roth, Dylan D.; Liu, Steven; Fisher, Carla S.; Fan, Betty; Imeokparia, Folasade; Ludwig, Kandice; Lester, Mary E.; Hassanein, Aladdin H.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    PURPOSE: Infections are problematic in implant-based reconstruction after mastectomies. Infection rates have been reported to be as high as 31%. Strategies to reduce the risk of infection include various antibiotic irrigation solutions, “no-touch” techniques, optimizing sterility, and empiric antibiotic use for skin flora coverage. Absorbable antibiotic beads have been well described for other indications, including orthopedic and pressure sore reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of prophylactic biodegradable antibiotic beads during pre-pectoral and sub-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction post-mastectomy between 2019 to 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I were deemed “high risk” by the senior author and received biodegradable antibiotic beads (1 gram vancomycin, 240 mg gentamicin) during tissue expander or implant reconstruction (pre-pectoral or subpectoral) while Group II (control) had no antibiotic beads. Demographic data, diabetes, body mass index (BMI), implant plane (pre-pectoral or sub-pectoral), smoking and use of mesh were recorded. Outcome variables included postoperative cellulitis or infection requiring oral or intravenous antibiotics and tissue expander loss at 90 days. RESULTS: In our study period, 19 patients (36 total implants/expanders) received biodegradable antibiotic beads during implant-based breast reconstruction (Group I). There were 174 patients (290 total expanders) who did not receive antibiotic beads (Group II). Patients in Group I had a history of previous expander/implant infection in 73.6%. Pre-pectoral placement of implants occurred in 84.2% of patients in Group I and 74.1% in Group II. Diabetes was prevalent in 15.8% of Group I compared to 5.7% seen in Group II patients. The mean BMI in Group I was 30.5 kg/m2 compared to 27.8 kg/m2 in Group II (p-value 0.88). Implant infection rate of Group I at 90 days was 8.3% (3/36 total expanders) compared to 8.6% (25/290 total expanders) in Group II. Implant loss in Group I was 5.5% (2/26 total expanders) compared to 7.6% (22/290) in Group II. CONCLUSION: The incidence of infection in high risk patients who have absorbable antibiotic beads placed during the time of reconstruction appears to be normalized to the control group in this pilot study, suggesting that absorbable antibiotic beads may decrease postoperative infection complications. Future studies may further clarify its benefit in selected groups.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prophylactic Absorbable Antibiotic Beads for High-risk, Implant-based Prepectoral Reconstruction
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2023-10-16) Ahmed, Shahnur; Lee, Jason T. C.; Roth, Dylan; Sinha, Mithun; Fisher, Carla; Fan, Betty; Imeokparia, Folasade; Ludwig, Kandice; Lester, Mary E.; Hassanein, Aladdin H.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Infections are problematic in postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction with infection rates as high as 30%. Strategies to reduce the risk of infection have demonstrated various efficacies. A prolonged course of systemic, oral antibiotics has not shown evidence-based benefit. Although absorbable antibiotic beads have been described for orthopedic procedures and pressure wounds, their use has not been well studied during breast reconstruction, particularly for prepectoral implant placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the selective use of prophylactic absorbable calcium sulfate antibiotic beads during high-risk implant-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients who underwent implant-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed. Groups were divided into those who received antibiotic beads and those who did not. Outcome variables included postoperative infection at 90 days. A total of 148 patients (256 implants) were included: 15 patients (31 implants) who received biodegradable antibiotic beads and 133 patients (225 implants) in the control group. Patients who received antibiotic beads were more likely to have a history of infection (66.7%) compared with the control group (0%) (P < 0.01). Surgical site infection occurred in 3.2% of implants in the antibiotic bead group compared with 7.6%, but this did not reach statistical significance. The incidence of infection in high-risk patients who have absorbable antibiotic beads placed during the time of reconstruction seems to be normalized to the control group in this pilot study. We present a novel use of prophylactic absorbable antibiotic beads in prepectoral breast implant reconstruction.