Browsing by Author "Le-Niculescu, Helen"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessing Risk of Future Suicidality in Emergency Department Patients
    (Wiley, 2020-04-02) Brucker, Krista; Duggan, Carter; Niezer, Joseph; Roseberry, Kyle; Le-Niculescu, Helen; Niculescu, Alexander B.; Kline, Jeffrey A.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background. Emergency Departments (ED) are the first line of evaluation for patients at risk and in crisis, with or without overt suicidality (ideation, attempts). Currently employed triage and assessments methods miss some of the individuals who subsequently become suicidal. The Convergent Functional Information for Suicidality (CFI-S) 22 item checklist of risk factors, that does not ask directly about suicidal ideation, has demonstrated good predictive ability for suicidality in previous studies in psychiatric outpatients, but has not been tested in the real world-setting of emergency departments (EDs). Methods. We administered CFI-S prospectively to a convenience sample of consecutive ED patients. Median administration time was 3 minutes. Patients were also asked at triage about suicidal thoughts or intentions per standard ED suicide clinical screening (SCS), and the treating ED physician was asked to fill a physician gestalt visual analog scale (VAS) for likelihood of future suicidality spectrum events (SSE) (ideation, preparatory acts, attempts, completed suicide). We performed structured chart review and telephone follow-up at 6 months post index visit. Results. The median time to complete the CFI-S was three minutes (1st to 3rd quartile 3–6 minutes). Of the 338 patients enrolled, 45 (13.3%) were positive on the initial SCS, and 32 (9.5%) experienced a SSE in the 6 months follow-up. Overall, across genders, SCS had a modest diagnostic discrimination for future SSE (ROC AUC 0.63,). The physician VAS was better (AUC 0.76 CI 0.66–0.85), and the CFI-S was slightly higher (AUC 0.81, CI 0.76–0.87). The top CFI-S differentiating items were psychiatric illness, perceived uselessness, and social isolation. The top CFI-S items were family history of suicide, age, and past history of suicidal acts. Conclusions. Using CFI-S, or some of its items, in busy EDs may help improve the detection of patients at high risk for future suicidality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Convergence of recent GWAS data for suicidality with previous blood biomarkers: independent reproducibility using independent methodologies in independent cohorts
    (Nature, 2020) Niculescu, Alexander B., III; Le-Niculescu, Helen; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Recent genetic studies for suicidality, including four independent GWAS, have not reproduced each other’s top implicated genes. While arguments of heterogeneity, methodology, and sample sizes can be invoked, heterogeneity is a feature, not a “bug” (as is well understood in biology and in personalized medicine). A comprehensive body of work on blood biomarkers for suicidality has previously been published by our group. We examine the issue of reproducibility using these different approaches, and provide reassuring evidence for convergence of findings, as well as some generalizable insights.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Dissecting Suicidality Using a Combined Genomic and Clinical Approach
    (Nature Publishing Group, 2017-01) Niculescu, Alexander B; Le-Niculescu, Helen; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Precision medicine in psychiatry: biomarkers to the forefront
    (Springer Nature, 2022) Niculescu, Alexander B.; Le-Niculescu, Helen; Psychiatry, School of Medicine