ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Lau, Constance"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical Utility of Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing Among Immunocompromised Patients With Pneumonia
    (Oxford University Press, 2024-07-22) Madut, Deng B.; Chemaly, Roy F.; Dadwal, Sanjeet S.; Hill, Joshua A.; Lee, Yeon Joo; Haidar, Ghady; Luk, Alfred; Drelick, Alexander; Chin-Hong, Peter V.; Benamu, Esther; Khawaja, Fareed; Nanayakkara, Deepa; Papanicolaou, Genovefa A.; Butkus Small, Catherine; Fung, Monica; Barron, Michelle; Davis, Thomas; McClain, Micah T.; Maziarz, Eileen K.; Bedoya, Armando D.; Gilstrap, Daniel L.; Todd, Jamie L.; Barkauskas, Christina E.; Heldman, Madeleine R.; Bigelow, Robert; Leimberger, Jeffrey D.; Tsalik, Ephraim L.; Wolf, Olivia; Mughar, Mona; Lau, Constance; Noll, Nicholas; Hollemon, Desiree; Duttagupta, Radha; Lupu, Daniel S.; Bercovici, Sivan; Perkins, Bradley A.; Blauwkamp, Timothy A.; Fowler, Vance G., Jr.; Holland, Thomas L.; Bergin, Stephen P.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing can establish the etiology of multiple infectious syndromes by identifying microbial DNA in plasma. However, data are needed to define the clinical scenarios where this tool offers the highest clinical benefit. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study that evaluated the impact of plasma mcfDNA sequencing compared with usual care testing among adults with hematologic malignancies. This is a secondary analysis of an expanded cohort that evaluated the clinical utility of plasma mcfDNA sequencing across prespecified and adjudicated outcomes. We examined the percentage of participants for whom plasma mcfDNA sequencing identified a probable cause of pneumonia or clinically relevant nonpneumonia infection. We then assessed potential changes in antimicrobial therapy based on plasma mcfDNA sequencing results and the potential for early mcfDNA testing to avoid bronchoscopy and its associated adverse events. Results: Of 223 participants, at least 1 microbial detection by plasma mcfDNA sequencing was adjudicated as a probable cause of pneumonia in 57 (25.6%) and a clinically relevant nonpneumonia infection in 88 (39.5%). A probable cause of pneumonia was exclusively identified by plasma mcfDNA sequencing in 23 (10.3%) participants. Antimicrobial therapy would have changed for 41 (18.4%) participants had plasma mcfDNA results been available in real time. Among the 57 participants with a probable cause of pneumonia identified by plasma mcfDNA sequencing, bronchoscopy identified no additional probable cause of pneumonia in 52 (91.2%). Conclusions: Plasma mcfDNA sequencing could improve management of both pneumonia and other concurrent infections in immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University