- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Lacaille, Florence"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature(Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Rinella, Mary E.; Lazarus, Jeffrey V.; Ratziu, Vlad; Francque, Sven M.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Kanwal, Fasiha; Romero, Diana; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Anstee, Quentin M.; Arab, Juan Pablo; Arrese, Marco; Bataller, Ramon; Beuers, Ulrich; Boursier, Jerome; Bugianesi, Elisabetta; Byrne, Christopher D.; Castro Narro, Graciela E.; Chowdhury, Abhijit; Cortez-Pinto, Helena; Cryer, Donna R.; Cusi, Kenneth; El-Kassas, Mohamed; Klein, Samuel; Eskridge, Wayne; Fan, Jiangao; Gawrieh, Samer; Guy, Cynthia D.; Harrison, Stephen A.; Kim, Seung Up; Koot, Bart G.; Korenjak, Marko; Kowdley, Kris V.; Lacaille, Florence; Loomba, Rohit; Mitchell-Thain, Robert; Morgan, Timothy R.; Powell, Elisabeth E.; Roden, Michael; Romero-Gómez, Manuel; Silva, Marcelo; Singh, Shivaram Prasad; Sookoian, Silvia C.; Spearman, C. Wendy; Tiniakos, Dina; Valenti, Luca; Vos, Miriam B.; Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun; Xanthakos, Stavra; Yilmaz, Yusuf; Younossi, Zobair; Hobbs, Ansley; Villota-Rivas, Marcela; Newsome, Philip N.; NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group; Medicine, School of MedicineThe principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.Item Impact of Genotype, Serum Bile Acids, and Surgical Biliary Diversion on Native Liver Survival in FIC1 Deficiency(Wolters Kluwer, 2021-08) van Wessel, Daan B.E.; Thompson, Richard J.; Gonzales, Emmanuel; Jankowska, Irena; Shneider, Benjamin L.; Sokal, Etienne; Grammatikopoulos, Tassos; Kadaristiana, Agustina; Jacquemin, Emmanuel; Spraul, Anne; Lipiński, Patryk; Czubkowski, Piotr; Rock, Nathalie; Shagrani, Mohammad; Broering, Dieter; Algoufi, Talal; Mazhar, Nejat; Nicastro, Emanuele; Kelly, Deirdre; Nebbia, Gabriella; Arnell, Henrik; Fischler, Björn; Hulscher, Jan B.F.; Serranti, Daniele; Arikan, Cigdem; Debray, Dominique; Lacaille, Florence; Goncalves, Cristina; Hierro, Loreto; Muñoz Bartolo, Gema; Mozer-Glassberg, Yael; Azaz, Amer; Brecelj, Jernej; Dezsőfi, Antal; Calvo, Pier Luigi; Krebs-Schmitt, Dorothee; Hartleif, Steffen; van der Woerd, Wendy L.; Wang, Jian-She; Li, Li-ting; Durmaz, Özlem; Kerkar, Nanda; Hørby Jørgensen, Marianne; Fischer, Ryan; Jimenez-Rivera, Carolina; Alam, Seema; Cananzi, Mara; Laverdure, Noémie; Targa Ferreira, Cristina; Ordonez, Felipe; Wang, Heng; Sency, Valerie; Kim, Kyung Mo; Chen, Huey-Ling; Carvalho, Elisa; Fabre, Alexandre; Bernabeu, Jesus Quintero; Alonso, Estella M.; Sokol, Ronald J.; Suchy, Frederick J.; Loomes, Kathleen M.; McKiernan, Patrick J.; Rosenthal, Philip; Turmelle, Yumirle; Rao, Girish S.; Horslen, Simon; Kamath, Binita M.; Rogalidou, Maria; Karnsakul, Wikrom W.; Hansen, Bettina; Verkade, Henkjan J.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground and aims: Mutations in ATPase phospholipid transporting 8B1 (ATP8B1) can lead to familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (FIC1) deficiency, or progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1. The rarity of FIC1 deficiency has largely prevented a detailed analysis of its natural history, effects of predicted protein truncating mutations (PPTMs), and possible associations of serum bile acid (sBA) concentrations and surgical biliary diversion (SBD) with long-term outcome. We aimed to provide insights by using the largest genetically defined cohort of patients with FIC1 deficiency to date. Approach and results: This multicenter, combined retrospective and prospective study included 130 patients with compound heterozygous or homozygous predicted pathogenic ATP8B1 variants. Patients were categorized according to the number of PPTMs (i.e., splice site, frameshift due to deletion or insertion, nonsense, duplication), FIC1-A (n = 67; no PPTMs), FIC1-B (n = 29; one PPTM), or FIC1-C (n = 34; two PPTMs). Survival analysis showed an overall native liver survival (NLS) of 44% at age 18 years. NLS was comparable among FIC1-A, FIC1-B, and FIC1-C (% NLS at age 10 years: 67%, 41%, and 59%, respectively; P = 0.12), despite FIC1-C undergoing SBD less often (% SBD at age 10 years: 65%, 57%, and 45%, respectively; P = 0.03). sBAs at presentation were negatively associated with NLS (NLS at age 10 years, sBAs < 194 µmol/L: 49% vs. sBAs ≥ 194 µmol/L: 15%; P = 0.03). SBD decreased sBAs (230 [125-282] to 74 [11-177] μmol/L; P = 0.005). SBD (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-1.03, P = 0.06) and post-SBD sBA concentrations < 65 μmol/L (P = 0.05) tended to be associated with improved NLS. Conclusions: Less than half of patients with FIC1 deficiency reach adulthood with native liver. The number of PPTMs did not associate with the natural history or prognosis of FIC1 deficiency. sBA concentrations at initial presentation and after SBD provide limited prognostic information on long-term NLS.