- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Kropf, Martha E."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Qualitative Examination of Voting Empowerment and Participation Among People Living With Traumatic Brain Injury(Elsevier, 2021) Hammond, Flora M.; Davis, Christine S.; Hirsch, Mark A.; Snow, Julia M.; Kropf, Martha E.; Schur, Lisa; Kruse, Douglas; Ball, Andrew M.; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineObjective To examine political participation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design Qualitative, participatory research via interviews and observations. Each participant was interviewed to discuss their experience of voting in 2007 or 2008. Data were coded using Grounded Theory to develop themes, metacodes, and theories. Setting Community. Participants A total of 57 individuals with history of TBI and 28 family members (N=85). Main Outcome Measures Not applicable. Results Four themes emerged from the data: (1) people with TBI have barriers to voting; (2) the voting process can be improved for people with TBI; (3) voting is the responsibility of members of society; and (4) voting is one way we have a voice in society. Conclusions The data support the importance of voting as an American right regardless of the presence of disability. While persons with TBI report voting represents their freedom and voice, there may be barriers that can threaten or limit their voice.Item Voting Characteristics of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury(Wiley, 2019-03) Hirsch, Mark A.; Kropf, Martha E.; Hammond, Flora M.; Schur, Lisa; Karlawish, Jason H.; Ball, Andrew M.; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineVoting is the foundation of democracy. Limited data exist about voting characteristics of individuals with neurologic impairment including those living with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). To statistically examine voting characteristics using a convenience sample of registered voters with TBI during elections held in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina—2007, 2008. Data were collected on 51 participants with TBI during May 2007, 2008 general, and 2008 Presidential Election. (i) There was a significant difference between the Competence Assessment Tool for Voting (CAT‐V) total score of participants with TBI who voted and the CAT‐V total score of participants with TBI who did not vote and the CAT‐V total score predicted voting; (ii) the age of the participants with TBI was predictive of voting; and (iii) being married was inversely related to voting. We find that there is variation in voting even among this small sample interviewed for the present study, and that the variation is predictable. Those with the highest CAT‐Vs are most likely to vote. In addition, we find that traditional predictors of voting simply are not predictors among this TBI group, and even one, whether the person is married, has a negative effect on voting.