Browsing by Author "Kowalski, Thomas"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasia in a Large Cohort in North America
    (Elsevier, 2020) Ngamruengphong, Saowanee; Ferri, Lorenzo; Aihara, Hiroyuki; Draganov, Peter V.; Yang, Dennis J.; Perbtani, Yaseen B.; Jue, Terry L.; Munroe, Craig A.; Boparai, Eshandeep S.; Mehta, Neal A.; Bhatt, Amit; Kumta, Nikhil A.; Othman, Mohamed O.; Mercado, Michael; Javaid, Huma; Aadam, Abdul Aziz; Siegel, Amanda; James, Theodore W.; Grimm, Ian S.; DeWitt, John M.; Novikov, Aleksey; Schlachterman, Alexander; Kowalski, Thomas; Samarasena, Jason; Hashimoto, Rintaro; Chehade, Nabil El Hage; Lee, John; Chang, Kenneth; Su, Bailey; Ujiki, Michael B.; Mehta, Amit; Sharaiha, Reem Z.; Carr-Locke, David L.; Chen, Alex; Chen, Michael; Chen, Yen-I.; Khoshknab, MirMilad Pourmousavi; Wang, Rui; Kerdsirichairat, Tossapol; Tomizawa, Yutaka; von Renteln, Daniel; Kumbhari, Vivek; Khashab, Mouen A.; Bechara, Robert; Karasik, Michael; Patel, Neej J.; Fukami, Norio; Nishimura, Makoto; Hanada, Yuri; Wong Kee Song, Louis M.; Laszkowska, Monika; Wang, Andrew Y.; Hwang, Joo Ha; Friedland, Shai; Sethi, Amrita; Kalloo, Antony N.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background & Aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment option for superficial gastric neoplasia in Asia, but there are few data on outcomes of gastric ESD from North America. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD in North America. Methods We analyzed data from 347 patients who underwent gastric ESD at 25 centers, from 2010 through 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedure details and related adverse events, treatment outcomes, local recurrence, and vital status at the last follow up. For the 277 patients with available follow-up data, the median interval between initial ESD and last clinical or endoscopic evaluation was 364 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of en bloc and R0 resection. Secondary outcomes included curative resection, rates of adverse events and recurrence, and gastric cancer-related death. Results Ninety patients (26%) had low-grade adenomas or dysplasia, 82 patients (24%) had high-grade dysplasia, 139 patients (40%) had early gastric cancer, and 36 patients (10%) had neuroendocrine tumors. Proportions of en bloc and R0 resection for all lesions were 92%/82%, for early gastric cancers were 94%/75%, for adenomas and low-grade dysplasia were 93%/ 92%, for high-grade dysplasia were 89%/ 87%, and for neuroendocrine tumors were 92%/75%. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.6% of patients; 82% of these were treated successfully with endoscopic therapy. Delayed bleeding occurred in 2.6% of patients. No delayed perforation or procedure-related deaths were observed. There were local recurrences in 3.9% of cases; all occurred after non-curative ESD resection. Metachronous lesions were identified in 14 patients (6.9%). One of 277 patients with clinical follow up died of metachronous gastric cancer that occurred 2.5 years after the initial ESD. Conclusions ESD is a highly effective treatment for superficial gastric neoplasia and should be considered as a viable option for patients in North America. The risk of local recurrence is low and occurs exclusively after non-curative resection. Careful endoscopic surveillance is necessary to identify and treat metachronous lesions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Integrated molecular pathology accurately determines the malignant potential of pancreatic cysts
    (Thieme, 2015-02) Al-Haddad, Mohammad A.; Kowalski, Thomas; Siddiqui, Ali; Mertz, Howard R.; Mallat, Damien; Haddad, Nadim; Malhotra, Nidhi; Sadowski, Brett; Lybik, Mark J.; Patel, Sandeep N.; Okoh, Emuejevoke; Rosenkranz, Laura; Karasik, Michael; Golioto, Michael; Linder, Jeffrey; Catalano, Marc F.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Background and study aims: Current diagnostic testing is inadequate to determine the malignant potential of pancreatic cysts, resulting in overcautious patient management. Integrated molecular pathology (IMP) testing combines molecular analysis with first-line test results (cytology, imaging, and fluid chemistry) to assess the malignant potential of pancreatic cysts. This multicenter study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of IMP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and the utility of IMP testing under current guideline recommendations for managing pancreatic cysts. Patients and methods: Patients who had undergone previous IMP testing as prescribed by their physician and for whom clinical outcomes were available from retrospective record review were included (n = 492). Performance was determined by correlation between clinical outcome and previous IMP diagnosis (“benign”/“statistically indolent” vs. “statistically higher risk [SHR]”/ “aggressive”) or an International Consensus Guideline (Sendai 2012) criteria model for “surveillance” vs. “surgery.” The Cox proportional hazards model determined hazard ratios for malignancy. Results: Benign and statistically indolent IMP diagnoses had a 97 % probability of benign follow-up for up to 7 years and 8 months from initial IMP testing. SHR and aggressive diagnoses had relative hazard ratios for malignancy of 30.8 and 76.3, respectively (both P < 0.0001). Sendai surveillance criteria had a 97 % probability of benign follow-up for up to 7 years and 8 months, but for surgical criteria the hazard ratio was only 9.0 (P < 0.0001). In patients who met Sendai surgical criteria, benign and statistically indolent IMP diagnoses had a > 93 % probability of benign follow-up, with relative hazard ratios for SHR and aggressive IMP diagnoses of 16.1 and 50.2, respectively (both P < 0.0001). Conclusion: IMP more accurately determined the malignant potential of pancreatic cysts than a Sendai 2012 guideline management criteria model. IMP may improve patient management by justifying more relaxed observation in patients meeting Sendai surveillance criteria. IMP can more accurately differentiate between the need for surveillance or surgery in patients meeting Sendai surgical criteria.