Browsing by Author "Kneyber, Martin C.J."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Early Use of Adjunctive Therapies for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A PARDIE Study
    (American Thoracic Society, 2020-06) Rowan, Courtney M.; Klein, Margaret J.; Hsing, Deyin Doreen; Dahmer, Mary K.; Spinella, Philip C.; Emeriaud, Guillaume; Hassinger, Amanda B.; Piñeres-Olave, Byron E.; Flori, Heidi R.; Haileselassie, Bereketeab; Lopez-Fernandez, Yolanda M.; Chima, Ranjit S.; Shein, Steven L.; Maddux, Aline B.; Lillie, Jon; Izquierdo, Ledys; Kneyber, Martin C.J.; Smith, Lincoln S.; Khemani, Robinder G.; Thomas, Neal J.; Yehya, Nadir; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Rationale: Few data exist to guide early adjunctive therapy use in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS).Objectives: To describe contemporary use of adjunctive therapies for early PARDS as a framework for future investigations.Methods: This was a preplanned substudy of a prospective, international, cross-sectional observational study of children with PARDS from 100 centers over 10 study weeks.Measurements and Main Results: We investigated six adjunctive therapies for PARDS: continuous neuromuscular blockade, corticosteroids, inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), prone positioning, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Almost half (45%) of children with PARDS received at least one therapy. Variability was noted in the median starting oxygenation index of each therapy; corticosteroids started at the lowest oxygenation index (13.0; interquartile range, 7.6-22.0) and HFOV at the highest (25.7; interquartile range, 16.7-37.3). Continuous neuromuscular blockade was the most common, used in 31%, followed by iNO (13%), corticosteroids (10%), prone positioning (10%), HFOV (9%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3%). Steroids, iNO, and HFOV were associated with comorbidities. Prone positioning and HFOV were more common in middle-income countries and less frequently used in North America. The use of multiple ancillary therapies increased over the first 3 days of PARDS, but there was not an easily identifiable pattern of combination or order of use.Conclusions: The contemporary description of prevalence, combinations of therapies, and oxygenation threshold for which the therapies are applied is important for design of future studies. Region of the world, income, and comorbidities influence adjunctive therapy use and are important variables to include in PARDS investigations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Executive Summary: International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Ventilator Liberation, A PALISI Network Document
    (American Thoracic Society Journals, 2022-08-15) Abu-Sultaneh, Samer; Iyer, Narayan Prabhu; Fernández, Analía; Gaies, Michael; González-Dambrauskas, Sebastián; Hotz, Justin Christian; Kneyber, Martin C.J.; López-Fernández, Yolanda M.; Rotta, Alexandre T.; Werho, David K.; Baranwal, Arun Kumar; Blackwood, Bronagh; Craven, Hannah J.; Curley, Martha A.Q.; Essouri, Sandrine; Fioretto, Jose Roberto; Hartmann, Silvia M.M.; Jouvet, Philippe; Korang, Steven Kwasi; Rafferty, Gerrard F.; Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan; Rose, Louise; Tume, Lyvonne N.; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Wong, Judith Ju Ming; Emeriaud, Guillaume; Mastropietro, Christopher W; Napolitano, Natalie; Newth, Christopher J.L.; Khemani, Robinder G.
    RATIONALE: Pediatric specific ventilator liberation guidelines are lacking despite the many studies exploring elements of extubation readiness testing. The lack of clinical practice guidelines has led to significant and unnecessary variation in methods used to assess pediatric patients' readiness for extubation. METHODS: Twenty-six international experts comprised a multi-professional panel to establish pediatric specific ventilator liberation clinical practice guidelines, focusing on acutely hospitalized children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Eleven key questions were identified and first prioritized using the Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence. Systematic review was conducted for questions which did not meet an a-priori threshold of ≥80% agreement, with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies applied to develop the guidelines. The panel evaluated the evidence, drafted, and voted on the recommendations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three questions related to systematic screening, using an extubation readiness testing bundle and use of a spontaneous breathing trial as part of the bundle met Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations criteria of ≥80% agreement. For the remaining 8 questions, 5 systematic reviews yielded 12 recommendations related to the methods and duration of spontaneous breathing trials; measures of respiratory muscle strength; assessment of risk of post-extubation upper airway obstruction and its prevention; use of post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support; and sedation. Most recommendations were conditional and based on low to very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline provides a conceptual framework with evidence-based recommendations for best practices related to pediatric ventilator liberation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Operational Definitions related to Pediatric Ventilator Liberation
    (Elsevier, 2022-12-20) Abu-Sultaneh, Samer; Iyer, Narayan Prabhu; Fernández, Analía; Gaies, Michael; González-Dambrauskas, Sebastián; Hotz, Justin Christian; Kneyber, Martin C.J.; López-Fernández, Yolanda M.; Rotta, Alexandre T.; Werho, David K.; Baranwal, Arun Kumar; Blackwood, Bronagh; Craven, Hannah J.; Curley, Martha A.Q.; Essouri, Sandrine; Fioretto, Jose Roberto; Hartmann, Silvia M.M.; Jouvet, Philippe; Korang, Steven Kwasi; Rafferty, Gerrard F.; Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan; Rose, Louise; Tume, Lyvonne N.; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Wong, Judith Ju Ming; Emeriaud, Guillaume; Mastropietro, Christopher W.; Napolitano, Natalie; Newth, Christopher J.L.; Khemani, Robinder G.
    BACKGROUND: Common, operational definitions are crucial to assess interventions and outcomes related to pediatric mechanical ventilation. These definitions can reduce unnecessary variability amongst research and quality improvement efforts, to ensure findings are generalizable and can be pooled to establish best practices. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can we establish operational definitions for key elements related to pediatric ventilator liberation using a combination of detailed literature review and consensus-based approaches? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A panel of 26 international experts in pediatric ventilator liberation, two methodologists and two librarians conducted systematic reviews on eight topic areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation. Through a series of virtual meetings, we established draft definitions which were voted upon using an anonymous web-based process. Definitions were revised by incorporating extracted data gathered during the systematic review and discussed in another consensus meeting. A second round of voting was conducted to confirm the final definitions. RESULTS: In eight topic areas identified by the experts, 16 preliminary definitions were established. Based on initial discussion and the first round of voting, modifications were suggested for 11 of the 16 definitions. There was significant variability in how these items were defined in the literature reviewed. The final round of voting achieved ≥80% agreement for all 16 definitions in the following areas: what constitutes respiratory support (invasive mechanical ventilation and non-invasive respiratory support), liberation and failed attempts to liberate from invasive mechanical ventilation, liberation from respiratory support, duration of non-invasive respiratory support, total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing trials, extubation readiness testing, 28-ventilator free days, and planned vs rescue use of post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support. INTERPRETATION: We propose these consensus-based definitions for elements of pediatric ventilator liberation, informed by evidence, be used for future quality improvement initiatives and research studies to improve generalizability, and facilitate comparison.