Browsing by Author "Kisilu, Nicholas"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reducing Geographic Barriers for Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022-05-05) Adaniya, Emily; Bhatia, Manisha; Kiptoo, Stephen; Wabende, Lucy Najala; Kisilu, Nicholas; Kibiwot, Silvanus; Jepkirui, Sally; Awuor, Dorice Adhiambo; Loehrer, Patrick; Hunter-Squires, Joanna; Busakhala, Naftali; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Increasing travel times to the nearest diagnostic facilities and cancer centers are correlated with decreasing prevalence of breast cancer diagnosis and increasing stage of cancer at diagnosis. Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), in Uasin Gishu County, houses the only public cancer center in western Kenya. A MTRH program, the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program (ABCCCP) hosted health fair breast cancer screening events and mentored nurses at local health facilities to complete clinical breast exams (CBEs). The objective is to understand the effect of the ABCCCP in reducing geographic barriers for breast cancer screening/early diagnosis. Methods: This is a retrospective review of the 61,392 patients who underwent breast cancer screening at a ministry of health facility in western Kenya from 2017-2021. ABCCCP hosted health fairs targeted at communities and mentored nurses at health facilities to complete clinical breast exams (CBEs) to target individual patients. Facility distances from MTRH were mapped via Google Maps. Descriptive analyses were performed to a significance of α < 0.05. Results: Two-thirds of the screening/early diagnosis CBEs occurred in five of the 22 counties in western Kenya: Busia, Uasin Gishu, Trans-Nzoia, Bungoma, and Kakamega. However, these five counties only had 25% of all ABCCCP screening sites in western Kenya. Only Uasin Gishu and Kakamega provided chemotherapy while Busia and Trans-Nzoia had additional programming promoting preventative healthcare through integration of community health volunteers. In these five counties, no association between the distance of the ministry of health facilities from MTRH and number of CBEs completed existed. Conclusion: ABCCCP programming reduced some geographic disparities in breast cancer screening/diagnosis in the top five counties. It may be result of the number of mentored nurses and health fair events. Further work should be completed to understand if a relationship between geographic distance from MTRH and the stage and treatment patterns of these patients is also reduced by ABCCCP.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The role of community health workers in the surgical cascade: a scoping review
    (Springer Nature, 2021-10-03) Li, Helen W.; Scanlon, Michael L.; Kisilu, Nicholas; Litzelman, Debra K.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Community health workers (CHWs) can increase access to various primary healthcare services; however, their potential for improving surgical care is under-explored. We sought to assess the role of CHWs in the surgical cascade, defined as disease screening, linkage to operative care, and post-operative care. Given the well-described literature on CHWs and screening, we focused on the latter two steps of the surgical cascade. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature. We searched for studies published in any language from January 1, 2000 to May 1, 2020 using electronic literature databases including Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. We included articles on CHW involvement in linkage to operative care and/or post-operative surgical care. Narrative and descriptive methods were used to analyze the data. Results: The initial search identified 145 articles relevant to steps in the surgical cascade. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for review. In linkage to care, CHWs helped increase surgical enrollment, provide resources for vulnerable patients, and build trust in healthcare services. Post-operatively, CHWs acted as effective monitors for surgical-site infections and provided socially isolated patients with support and linkage to additional services. The complex and wide-ranging needs of surgical patients illustrated the need to view surgical care as a continuum rather than a singular operative event. Conclusion: While the current literature is limited, CHWs were able to maneuver complex medical, cultural, and social barriers to surgical care by linking patients to counseling, education, and community resources, as well as post-operative infection prevention services. Future studies would benefit from more rigorous study designs and larger sample sizes to further elucidate the role CHWs can serve in the surgical cascade.