- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Kiel, Patrick J."
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Analytical Validation of Variants to Aid in Genotype-Guided Therapy for Oncology(Elsevier, 2019) Swart, Marelize; Stansberry, Wesley M.; Pratt, Victoria M.; Medeiros, Elizabeth B.; Kiel, Patrick J.; Shen, Fei; Schneider, Bryan P.; Skaar, Todd C.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineThe Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988 requires that pharmacogenetic genotyping methods need to be established according to technical standards and laboratory practice guidelines before testing can be offered to patients. Testing methods for variants in ABCB1, CBR3, COMT, CYP3A7, C8ORF34, FCGR2A, FCGR3A, HAS3, NT5C2, NUDT15, SBF2, SEMA3C, SLC16A5, SLC28A3, SOD2, TLR4, and TPMT were validated in a CLIA-accredited laboratory. As no known reference materials were available, DNA samples that were from Coriell Cell Repositories (Camden, NJ) were used for the analytical validation studies. Pharmacogenetic testing methods developed here were shown to be accurate and 100% analytically sensitive and specific. Other CLIA-accredited laboratories interested in offering pharmacogenetic testing for these genetic variants, related to genotype-guided therapy for oncology, could use these publicly available samples as reference materials when developing and validating new genetic tests or refining current assays.Item Clinical benefit of a precision medicine based approach for guiding treatment of refractory cancers(Impact Journals, 2016-08-30) Radovich, Milan; Kiel, Patrick J.; Nance, Stacy M.; Niland, Erin E.; Parsley, Megan E.; Ferguson, Meagan E.; Jiang, Guanglong; Ammakkanavar, Natraj R.; Einhorn, Lawrence H.; Cheng, Liang; Nassiri, Mehdi; Davidson, Darrell D.; Rushing, Daniel A.; Loehrer, Patrick J.; Pili, Roberto; Hanna, Nasser; Callaghan, J. Thomas; Skaar, Todd C.; Helft, Paul R.; Shahda, Safi; O’Neil, Bert H.; Schneider, Bryan P.; Medicine, School of MedicinePatients and methods: Patients with metastatic solid tumors who had progressed on at least one line of standard of care therapy were referred to the Indiana University Health Precision Genomics Program. Tumor samples were submitted for DNA & RNA next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry for actionable targets. A multi-disciplinary tumor board reviewed all results. For each patient, the ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) of the genomically guided line of therapy divided by the PFS of their prior line was calculated. Patients whose PFS ratio was ≥ 1.3 were deemed to have a meaningful improvement in PFS. Results: From April 2014-October 2015, 168 patients were evaluated and 101 patients achieved adequate clinical follow-up for analysis. 19 of 44 (43.2%) patients treated with genomically guided therapy attained a PFS ratio ≥ 1.3 vs. 3 of 57 (5.3%) treated with non-genomically guided therapy (p < 0.0001). Similarly, overall PFS ratios (irrespective of cutoff) were higher for patients with genomically guided therapy vs non-genomically guided therapy (p = 0.05). Further, patients treated with genomically guided therapy had a superior median PFS compared to those treated with non-genomically guided therapy (86 days vs. 49 days, p = 0.005, H.R. = 0.55, 95% C.I.:0.37-0.84). Conclusion: Patients with refractory metastatic cancer who receive genomically guided therapy have improved PFS ratios and longer median PFS compared to patients who do not receive genomically guided therapy.Item Clinical Outcomes of a Pharmacy-Led Blood Factor Stewardship Program(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2015) Trueg, Anne O.; Lowe, Christopher; Kiel, Patrick J.; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineTo report the results of a pharmacist-directed blood factor stewardship program targeting off-label utilization designed to limit use to established organizational guidelines in high-risk populations. Prospective evaluation of recombinant factor VIIa and prothrombin complex concentrate orders beginning June 2013 through May 2014 and a matched retrospective cohort from June 2012 to May 2013. Matched cohorts were evaluated for 28-day mortality, change in international normalized ratio (INR), adverse events, concurrent blood product use, and cost savings. Forty-two orders for blood factor were ordered between June 2013 and May 2014, 70 orders in the year before (N = 112). Twenty eight-day mortality was not different between the cohorts: 53.9% versus 50% (P = 0.77). Blood factor use with underlying liver failure and active bleeding was strongly associated with 28-day mortality: odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 2.9 (1.5-7.14) and 2.91 (0.01-2.91), respectively. Blood products dispensed increased over the year with plasma products the most significant (1 vs. 4 P = 0.004). All other clinical outcomes were nonsignificant. An annual cost savings of $375,539 was achieved, primarily through a significant reduction in recombinant factor VIIa and avoidance in high-risk patients. Use of off-label blood factors can be controlled through a pharmacist-led stewardship program. Twenty eight-day mortality was not different between the 2 cohorts; however, identification of risk factors for death associated with blood factor use allows for restriction in high-risk populations, creates a discussion of futile care, and yields cost savings.Item Disease-free survival following high dose or standard dose therapy in patients with amyloidosis(Wiley, 2015) Kiel, Patrick J.; Trueg, Anne O.; Ferguson, Meagan; Benson, Merrill; Abonour, Rafat; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineItem Efficacy of Different Leuprolide Administration Schedules in Premenopausal Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Review(Elsevier, 2018) Kendzierski, Daniel C.; Schneider, Bryan P.; Kiel, Patrick J.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground Leuprolide is a safe and effective treatment of estrogen receptor–positive premenopausal breast cancer. Data from the SOFT/TEXT trials solidified leuprolide in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as an effective hormonal treatment for premenopausal breast cancer. However, the efficacy of monthly leuprolide depot compared to leuprolide depot every 3 months in combination with an aromatase inhibitor in this patient population is unclear. Patients and Methods In this single center retrospective study, 201 patients were enrolled between January 1, 2015, and October 1, 2016; 100 were included in the 7.5 mg leuprolide monthly injection plus aromatase inhibitor group and 101 in the 22.5 mg leuprolide injection every 3 months plus aromatase inhibitor group. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who experienced ovarian ablation, defined as an estradiol concentration less than 40 pg/mL and a follicle-stimulating hormone concentration of 23 to 116 mU/mL after 3 months of treatment. Significance threshold was P < .05 (2 sided). Secondary end points included disease-free survival and overall survival at 1-year follow-up, as well as adverse events reported during treatment. Results All patients in the monthly leuprolide arm experienced ovarian ablation compared to 100 (99%) of 101 patients in the arm treated every 3 months ( P = 1). The disease-free survival rate at 1 year was 95% in the monthly leuprolide arm and 97% in the arm treated every 3 months ( P = .75). The overall survival rate at 1 year was 100% in the monthly leuprolide arm and 99% in the arm treated every 3 months ( P = 1). The most common treatment-related adverse events between the 2 groups were musculoskeletal pain, hot flashes, fatigue, and insomnia. Conclusion Leuprolide acetate depot administered every 3 months is as efficacious and tolerable as a monthly injection in combination with an aromatase inhibitor for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.Item Exceptional Response with Immunotherapy in a Patient with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer(AlphaMed Press, 2017-10) Kollipara, Revathi; Schneider, Bryan; Radovich, Milan; Babu, Sunil; Kiel, Patrick J.; Medicine, School of MedicineChemotherapy with or without radiation is the standard therapy for anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), although the response rate is not high and not durable. We describe a 62-year-old male who was diagnosed with ATC and initially treated with a thyroidectomy and lymph node dissection, followed by chemotherapy. Next generation sequencing was then performed to guide therapy and the tumor was found to have BRAF and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity that was subsequently treated with vemurafenib and nivolumab. This led to substantial regression of tumor nodules. Genomic sequencing-based approaches to identify therapeutic targets has potential for improving outcomes. Currently, the patient continues to be in complete radiographic and clinical remission 20 months after beginning treatment with nivolumab. KEY POINTS: Programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 immunotherapy has shown evidence of durable responses in certain malignancies such as melanoma, lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma.PD-L1 positive tumors promote autoimmunity against the tumor; therefore, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may be beneficial.Molecular profiling could possibly result in improved targeted therapy for certain malignancies.Item Hepatitis C Virus Infection among Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Donors and Recipients: American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Task Force Recommendations(Elsevier, 2015-11) Torres, Harrys A.; Chong, Pearlie P.; De Lima, Marcos; Friedman, Mark S.; Giralt, Sergio; Hammond, Sarah P.; Kiel, Patrick J.; Masur, Henry; McDonald, George B.; Wingard, John R.; Gambarin-Gelwan, Maya; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineItem Implications of Incidental Germline Findings Identified In the Context of Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing for Guiding Cancer Therapy(ASCO, 2020) Schneider, Bryan P.; Stout, Leigh Anne; Philips, Santosh; Schroeder, Courtney; Scott, Susanna F.; Hunter, Cynthia; Kassem, Nawal; Kiel, Patrick J.; Radovich, Milan; Medicine, School of MedicinePURPOSE Identification of incidental germline mutations in the context of next-generation sequencing is an unintended consequence of advancing technologies. These data are critical for family members to understand disease risks and take action. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of 1,028 adult patients with metastatic cancer who were sequenced with tumor and germline whole exome sequencing (WES). Germline variant call files were mined for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants using the ClinVar database and narrowed to high-quality submitters. RESULTS Median age was 59 years, with 16% of patients ≤ 45 years old. The most common tumor types were breast cancer (12.5%), colorectal cancer (11.5%), sarcoma (9.3%), prostate cancer (8.4%), and lung cancer (6.6%). We identified 3,427 P/LP variants in 471 genes, and 84% of patients harbored one or more variant. One hundred thirty-two patients (12.8%) carried a P/LP variant in a cancer predisposition gene, with BRCA2 being the most common (1.6%). Patients with breast cancer were most likely to carry a P/LP variant (19.2%). One hundred ten patients (10.7%) carried a P/LP variant in a gene that would be recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics to be reported as a result of clinical actionability, with the most common being ATP7B (2.7%), BRCA2 (1.6%), MUTYH (1.4%), and BRCA1 (1%). Of patients who carried a P/LP variant in a cancer predisposition gene, only 53% would have been offered correct testing based on current clinical practice guidelines. Of 471 mutated genes, 231 genes had a P/LP variant identified in one patient, demonstrating significant genetic heterogeneity. CONCLUSION The majority of patients undergoing clinical cancer WES harbor a pathogenic germline variation. Identification of clinically actionable germline findings will create additional burden on oncology clinics as broader WES becomes common.Item Precision Genomic Practice in Oncology: Pharmacist Role and Experience in an Ambulatory Care Clinic(MDPI, 2020-03) Raheem, Farah; Kim, Pauline; Grove, Meagan; Kiel, Patrick J.; Medicine, School of MedicineRecent advancements in molecular testing, the availability of cost-effective technology, and novel approaches to clinical trial design have facilitated the implementation of tumor genome sequencing into standard of care oncology practices. Current models of precision oncology practice include specialized clinics or consultation services based on a molecular tumor board (MTB) approach. MTBs are comprised of interprofessional teams of clinicians and scientists who evaluate tumors at the molecular level to guide patient-specific targeted therapy. The practice of precision oncology utilizing MTB-based models is an emerging approach, transforming precision genomics from a novel concept into clinical practice. This rapid shift in practice from cytotoxic therapy to targeted medicine poses challenges, yet brings exciting opportunities to clinical pharmacists practicing in hematology and oncology. Only a few precision genomics programs in the United States have a strong pharmacy presence with oncology pharmacists serving in leadership roles in research, interpreting genomic sequencing, making treatment recommendations, and facilitating off-label drug procurement. This article describes the experience of the precision medicine clinic at the Indiana University Health Simon Cancer Center, with emphasis on the role of the pharmacist in the precision oncology initiative.Item Severe Capecitabine Toxicity Associated With a Rare DPYD Variant Identified Through Whole-Genome Sequencing(ASCO, 2020) Ly, Reynold C.; Schmidt, Remington E.; Kiel, Patrick J.; Pratt, Victoria M.; Schneider, Bryan P.; Radovich, Milan; Offer, Steven M.; Diasio, Robert B.; Skaar, Todd C.; Medicine, School of Medicine