Browsing by Author "Keswani, Rajesh N."

Now showing 1 - 10 of 11
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Advances for Managing Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Integrating Imaging and AI Innovations
    (MDPI, 2024-12-22) Seyithanoglu, Deniz; Durak, Gorkem; Keles, Elif; Medetalibeyoglu, Alpay; Hong, Ziliang; Zhang, Zheyuan; Taktak, Yavuz B.; Cebeci, Timurhan; Tiwari, Pallavi; Velichko, Yuri S.; Yazici, Cemal; Tirkes, Temel; Miller, Frank H.; Keswani, Rajesh N.; Spampinato, Concetto; Wallace, Michael B.; Bagci, Ulas; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) represent a spectrum of non-neoplasms and neoplasms with varying malignant potential, posing significant challenges in diagnosis and management. While some PCLs are precursors to pancreatic cancer, others remain benign, necessitating accurate differentiation for optimal patient care. Conventional approaches to PCL management rely heavily on radiographic imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), coupled with clinical and biochemical data. However, the observer-dependent nature of image interpretation and the complex morphology of PCLs can lead to diagnostic uncertainty and variability in patient management strategies. This review critically evaluates current PCL diagnosis and surveillance practices, showing features of the different lesions and highlighting the potential limitations of conventional methods. We then explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform PCL management. AI-driven strategies, including deep learning algorithms for automated pancreas and lesion segmentation, and radiomics for analyzing heterogeneity, can improve diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification. These advanced techniques can provide more objective and reproducible assessments, aiding clinicians in decision-making regarding follow-up intervals and surgical interventions. Early results suggest that AI-driven methods can significantly improve patient outcomes by enabling earlier detection of high-risk lesions and reducing unnecessary procedures for benign cysts. Finally, this review emphasizes that AI-driven approaches could potentially reshape the landscape of PCL management, ultimately leading to improved pancreatic cancer prevention.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Amalgamation of cloud-based colonoscopy videos with patient-level metadata to facilitate large-scale machine learning
    (Thieme, 2021) Keswani, Rajesh N.; Byrd, Daniel; Garcia Vicente, Florencia; Heller, J. Alex; Klug, Matthew; Mazumder, Nikhilesh R.; Wood, Jordan; Yang, Anthony D.; Etemadi, Mozziyar; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background and study aims: Storage of full-length endoscopic procedures is becoming increasingly popular. To facilitate large-scale machine learning (ML) focused on clinical outcomes, these videos must be merged with the patient-level data in the electronic health record (EHR). Our aim was to present a method of accurately linking patient-level EHR data with cloud stored colonoscopy videos. Methods: This study was conducted at a single academic medical center. Most procedure videos are automatically uploaded to the cloud server but are identified only by procedure time and procedure room. We developed and then tested an algorithm to match recorded videos with corresponding exams in the EHR based upon procedure time and room and subsequently extract frames of interest. Results: Among 28,611 total colonoscopies performed over the study period, 21,170 colonoscopy videos in 20,420 unique patients (54.2 % male, median age 58) were matched to EHR data. Of 100 randomly sampled videos, appropriate matching was manually confirmed in all. In total, these videos represented 489,721 minutes of colonoscopy performed by 50 endoscopists (median 214 colonoscopies per endoscopist). The most common procedure indications were polyp screening (47.3 %), surveillance (28.9 %) and inflammatory bowel disease (9.4 %). From these videos, we extracted procedure highlights (identified by image capture; mean 8.5 per colonoscopy) and surrounding frames. Conclusions: We report the successful merging of a large database of endoscopy videos stored with limited identifiers to rich patient-level data in a highly accurate manner. This technique facilitates the development of ML algorithms based upon relevant patient outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessment of colonoscopy skill using machine learning to measure quality: Proof-of-concept and initial validation
    (Thieme, 2024-07-03) Wittbrodt, Matthew; Klug, Matthew; Etemadi, Mozziyar; Yang, Anthony; Pandolfino, John E.; Keswani, Rajesh N.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background and study aims: Low-quality colonoscopy increases cancer risk but measuring quality remains challenging. We developed an automated, interactive assessment of colonoscopy quality (AI-CQ) using machine learning (ML). Methods: Based on quality guidelines, metrics selected for AI development included insertion time (IT), withdrawal time (WT), polyp detection rate (PDR), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC). Two novel metrics were also developed: HQ-WT (time during withdrawal with clear image) and WT-PT (withdrawal time subtracting polypectomy time). The model was pre-trained using a self-supervised vision transformer on unlabeled colonoscopy images and then finetuned for multi-label classification on another mutually exclusive colonoscopy image dataset. A timeline of video predictions and metric calculations were presented to clinicians in addition to the raw video using a web-based application. The model was externally validated using 50 colonoscopies at a second hospital. Results: The AI-CQ accuracy to identify cecal intubation was 88%. IT ( P = 0.99) and WT ( P = 0.99) were highly correlated between manual and AI-CQ measurements with a median difference of 1.5 seconds and 4.5 seconds, respectively. AI-CQ PDR did not significantly differ from manual PDR (47.6% versus 45.5%, P = 0.66). Retroflexion was correctly identified in 95.2% and number of right colon evaluations in 100% of colonoscopies. HQ-WT was 45.9% of, and significantly correlated with ( P = 0.85) WT time. Conclusions: An interactive AI assessment of colonoscopy skill can automatically assess quality. We propose that this tool can be utilized to rapidly identify and train providers in need of remediation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality
    (BMC, 2021-07-31) Keswani, Rajesh N.; Kahi, Charles J.; Benson, Mark; Gawron, Andrew J.; Kaltenbach, Tonya R.; Yadlapati, Rena H.; Gregory, Dyanna L.; Duloy, Anna; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: As right colon polyps are challenging to detect, a retroflexed view of right colon (RV) may be useful. However, cecal retroflexion (CR) without a RV to the hepatic flexure (HF) is inadequate. We aimed to determine the frequency of CR and quality of the RV in routine practice. Methods: This prospective observational study performed at an academic medical center assessed colonoscopy inspection technique of endoscopists who had performed ≥ 100 annual screening colonoscopies. We video recorded ≥ 28 screening/surveillance colonoscopies per endoscopist and randomly evaluated 7 videos per endoscopist. Six gastroenterologists blindly reviewed the videos to determine if CR was performed and HF withdrawal time (cecum to HF time, excluding ileal/polypectomy time). Results: Reviewers assessed 119 colonoscopies performed by 17 endoscopists. The median HF withdrawal time was 3 min and 46 s. CR was performed in 31% of colonoscopies. CR frequency varied between endoscopists with 9 never performing CR and 2 performing CR in all colonoscopies. When performed, nearly half (43%) of RVs did not extend to the HF with median RV duration of 16 s (IQR 9-30 s). Three polyps were identified in the RV (polyp detection rate of 8.1%), all identified prior to a forward view. Conclusions: CR is performed infrequently in routine practice. When CR is performed, the RV is of low quality with a very short inspection duration and insufficient ascending colon examination. Further education is required to educate endoscopists in optimal technique to improve overall colonoscopy quality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical outcomes of EUS-guided drainage of debris-containing pancreatic pseudocysts: a large multicenter study
    (Thieme, 2017-02) Yang, Dennis; Amin, Sunil; Gonzalez, Susana; Mullady, Daniel; Edmundowicz, Steven A.; DeWitt, John M.; Khashab, Mouen A.; Wang, Andrew Y.; Nagula, Satish; Buscaglia, Jonathan M.; Bucobo, Juan Carlos; Wagh, Mihir S.; Draganov, Peter V.; Stevens, Tyler; Vargo, John J.; Khara, Harshit S.; Diehl, David L.; Keswani, Rajesh N.; Komanduri, Srinadh; Yachimski, Patrick S.; Prabhu, Anoop; Kwon, Richard S.; Watson, Rabindra R.; Goodman, Adam J.; Benias, Petros; Carr-Locke, David L.; DiMaio, Christopher J.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Background and study aims Data on clinical outcomes of endoscopic drainage of debris-free pseudocysts (PDF) versus pseudocysts containing solid debris (PSD) are very limited. The aims of this study were to compare treatment outcomes between patients with PDF vs. PSD undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage via transmural stents. Patients and methods Retrospective review of 142 consecutive patients with pseudocysts who underwent EUS-guided transmural drainage (TM) from 2008 to 2014 at 15 academic centers in the United States. Main outcome measures included TM technical success, treatment outcomes (symptomatic and radiologic resolution), need for endoscopic re-intervention at follow-up, and adverse events (AEs). Results TM was performed in 90 patients with PDF and 52 with PSD. Technical success: PDF 87 (96.7 %) vs. PSD 51 (98.1 %). There was no difference in the rates for endoscopic re-intervention (5.5 % in PDF vs. 11.5 % in PSD; P = 0.33) or AEs (12.2 % in PDF vs. 19.2 % in PSD; P = 0.33). Median long-term follow-up after stent removal was 297 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 59 - 424 days) for PDF and 326 days (IQR: 180 - 448 days) for PSD (P = 0.88). There was a higher rate of short-term radiologic resolution of PDF (45; 66.2 %) vs. PSD (21; 51.2 %) (OR = 0.30; 95 % CI: 0.13 - 0.72; P = 0.009). There was no difference in long-term symptomatic resolution (PDF: 70.4 % vs. PSD: 66.7 %; P = 0.72) or radiologic resolution (PDF: 68.9 % vs. PSD: 78.6 %; P = 0.72) Conclusions There was no difference in need for endoscopic re-intervention, AEs or long-term treatment outcomes in patients with PDF vs. PSD undergoing EUS-guided drainage with transmural stents. Based on these results, the presence of solid debris in pancreatic fluid collections does not appear to be associated with a poorer outcome.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Digestive Manifestations in Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019
    (Elsevier, 2020-10-01) Elmunzer, B. Joseph; Spitzer, Rebecca L.; Foster, Lydia D.; Merchant, Ambreen A.; Howard, Eric F.; Patel, Vaishali A.; West, Mary K.; Qayed, Emad; Nustas, Rosemary; Zakaria, Ali; Piper, Marc S.; Taylor, Jason R.; Jaza, Lujain; Forbes, Nauzer; Chau, Millie; Lara, Luis F.; Papachristou, Georgios I.; Volk, Michael L.; Hilson, Liam G.; Zhou, Selena; Kushnir, Vladimir M.; Lenyo, Alexandria M.; McLeod, Caroline G.; Amin, Sunil; Kuftinec, Gabriela N.; Yadav, Dhiraj; Fox, Charlie; Kolb, Jennifer M.; Pawa, Swati; Pawa, Rishi; Canakis, Andrew; Huang, Christopher; Jamil, Laith H.; Aneese, Andrew M.; Glamour, Benita K.; Smith, Zachary L.; Hanley, Katherine A.; Wood, Jordan; Patel, Harsh K.; Shah, Janak N.; Agarunov, Emil; Sethi, Amrita; Fogel, Evan L.; McNulty, Gail; Haseeb, Abdul; Trieu, Judy A.; Dixon, Rebekah E.; Yang, Jeong Yun; Mendelsohn, Robin B.; Calo, Delia; Aroniadis, Olga C.; LaComb, Joseph F.; Scheiman, James M.; Sauer, Bryan G.; Dang, Duyen T.; Piraka, Cyrus R.; Shah, Eric D.; Pohl, Heiko; Tierney, William M.; Mitchell, Stephanie; Condon, Ashwinee; Lenhart, Adrienne; Dua, Kulwinder S.; Kanagala, Vikram S.; Kamal, Ayesha; Singh, Vikesh K.; Pinto-Sanchez, Maria Ines; Hutchinson, Joy M.; Kwon, Richard S.; Korsnes, Sheryl J.; Singh, Harminder; Solati, Zahra; Willingham, Field F.; Yachimski, Patrick S.; Conwell, Darwin L.; Mosier, Evan; Azab, Mohamed; Patel, Anish; Buxbaum, James; Wani, Sachin; Chak, Amitabh; Hosmer, Amy E.; Keswani, Rajesh N.; DiMaio, Christopher J.; Bronze, Michael S.; Muthusamy, Raman; Canto, Marcia I.; Gjeorgjievski, V. Mihajlo; Imam, Zaid; Odish, Fadi; Edhi, Ahmed I.; Orosey, Molly; Tiwari, Abhinav; Patwardhan, Soumil; Brown, Nicholas G.; Patel, Anish A.; Ordiah, Collins O.; Sloan, Ian P.; Cruz, Lilian; Koza, Casey L.; Okafor, Uchechi; Hollander, Thomas; Furey, Nancy; Reykhart, Olga; Zbib, Natalia H.; Damianos, John A.; Esteban, James; Hajidiacos, Nick; Saul, Melissa; Mays, Melanie; Anderson, Gulsum; Wood, Kelley; Mathews, Laura; Diakova, Galina; Caisse, Molly; Wakefield, Lauren; Nitchie, Haley; Waljee, Akbar K.; Tang, Weijing; Zhang, Yueyang; Zhu, Ji; Deshpande, Amar R.; Rockey, Don C.; Alford, Teldon B.; Durkalski, Valerie; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background & Aims The prevalence and significance of digestive manifestations in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain uncertain. We aimed to assess the prevalence, spectrum, severity, and significance of digestive manifestations in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods Consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were identified across a geographically diverse alliance of medical centers in North America. Data pertaining to baseline characteristics, symptomatology, laboratory assessment, imaging, and endoscopic findings from the time of symptom onset until discharge or death were abstracted manually from electronic health records to characterize the prevalence, spectrum, and severity of digestive manifestations. Regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between digestive manifestations and severe outcomes related to COVID-19. Results A total of 1992 patients across 36 centers met eligibility criteria and were included. Overall, 53% of patients experienced at least 1 gastrointestinal symptom at any time during their illness, most commonly diarrhea (34%), nausea (27%), vomiting (16%), and abdominal pain (11%). In 74% of cases, gastrointestinal symptoms were judged to be mild. In total, 35% of patients developed an abnormal alanine aminotransferase or total bilirubin level; these were increased to less than 5 times the upper limit of normal in 77% of cases. After adjusting for potential confounders, the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms at any time (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76–1.15) or liver test abnormalities on admission (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80–2.12) were not associated independently with mechanical ventilation or death. Conclusions Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, gastrointestinal symptoms and liver test abnormalities were common, but the majority were mild and their presence was not associated with a more severe clinical course.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Digestive Manifestations in Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019
    (Elsevier, 2021-07) Elmunzer, B. Joseph; Spitzer, Rebecca L.; Foster, Lydia D.; Merchant, Ambreen A.; Howard, Eric F.; Patel, Vaishali A.; West, Mary K.; Qayed, Emad; Nustas, Rosemary; Zakaria, Ali; Piper, Marc S.; Taylor, Jason R.; Jaza, Lujain; Forbes, Nauzer; Chau, Millie; Lara, Luis F.; Papachristou, Georgios I.; Volk, Michael L.; Hilson, Liam G.; Zhou, Selena; Kushnir, Vladimir M.; Lenyo, Alexandria M.; McLeod, Caroline G.; Amin, Sunil; Kuftinec, Gabriela N.; Yadav, Dhiraj; Fox, Charlie; Kolb, Jennifer M.; Pawa, Swati; Pawa, Rishi; Canakis, Andrew; Huang, Christopher; Jamil, Laith H.; Aneese, Andrew M.; Glamour, Benita K.; Smith, Zachary L.; Hanley, Katherine A.; Wood, Jordan; Patel, Harsh K.; Shah, Janak N.; Agarunov, Emil; Sethi, Amrita; Fogel, Evan L.; McNulty, Gail; Haseeb, Abdul; Trieu, Judy A.; Dixon, Rebekah E.; Yang, Jeong Yun; Mendelsohn, Robin B.; Calo, Delia; Aroniadis, Olga C.; LaComb, Joseph F.; Scheiman, James M.; Sauer, Bryan G.; Dang, Duyen T.; Piraka, Cyrus R.; Shah, Eric D.; Pohl, Heiko; Tierney, William M.; Mitchell, Stephanie; Condon, Ashwinee; Lenhart, Adrienne; Dua, Kulwinder S.; Kanagala, Vikram S.; Kamal, Ayesha; Singh, Vikesh K.; Pinto-Sanchez, Maria Ines; Hutchinson, Joy M.; Kwon, Richard S.; Korsnes, Sheryl J.; Singh, Harminder; Solati, Zahra; Willingham, Field F.; Yachimski, Patrick S.; Conwell, Darwin L.; Mosier, Evan; Azab, Mohamed; Patel, Anish; Buxbaum, James; Wani, Sachin; Chak, Amitabh; Hosmer, Amy E.; Keswani, Rajesh N.; DiMaio, Christopher J.; Bronze, Michael S.; Muthusamy, Raman; Canto, Marcia I.; Gjeorgjievski, V. Mihajlo; Imam, Zaid; Odish, Fadi; Edhi, Ahmed I.; Orosey, Molly; Tiwari, Abhinav; Patwardhan, Soumil; Brown, Nicholas G.; Patel, Anish A.; Ordiah, Collins O.; Sloan, Ian P.; Cruz, Lilian; Koza, Casey L.; Okafor, Uchechi; Hollander, Thomas; Furey, Nancy; Reykhart, Olga; Zbib, Natalia H.; Damianos, John A.; Esteban, James; Hajidiacos, Nick; Saul, Melissa; Mays, Melanie; Anderson, Gulsum; Wood, Kelley; Mathews, Laura; Diakova, Galina; Caisse, Molly; Wakefield, Lauren; Nitchie, Haley; Waljee, Akbar K.; Tang, Weijing; Zhang, Yueyang; Zhu, Ji; Deshpande, Amar R.; Rockey, Don C.; Alford, Teldon B.; Durkalski, Valerie; North American Alliance for the Study of Digestive Manifestations of COVID-19; Medicine, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prevalence and significance of digestive manifestations in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain uncertain. We aimed to assess the prevalence, spectrum, severity, and significance of digestive manifestations in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: Consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were identified across a geographically diverse alliance of medical centers in North America. Data pertaining to baseline characteristics, symptomatology, laboratory assessment, imaging, and endoscopic findings from the time of symptom onset until discharge or death were abstracted manually from electronic health records to characterize the prevalence, spectrum, and severity of digestive manifestations. Regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between digestive manifestations and severe outcomes related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 1992 patients across 36 centers met eligibility criteria and were included. Overall, 53% of patients experienced at least 1 gastrointestinal symptom at any time during their illness, most commonly diarrhea (34%), nausea (27%), vomiting (16%), and abdominal pain (11%). In 74% of cases, gastrointestinal symptoms were judged to be mild. In total, 35% of patients developed an abnormal alanine aminotransferase or total bilirubin level; these were increased to less than 5 times the upper limit of normal in 77% of cases. After adjusting for potential confounders, the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms at any time (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.15) or liver test abnormalities on admission (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80-2.12) were not associated independently with mechanical ventilation or death. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, gastrointestinal symptoms and liver test abnormalities were common, but the majority were mild and their presence was not associated with a more severe clinical course.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills improves group colonoscopy quality in providers with lower adenoma detection rates
    (Thieme, 2022-03-14) Keswani, Rajesh N.; Wood, Mariah; Benson, Mark; Gawron, Andrew J.; Kahi, Charles; Kaltenbach, Tonya; Yadlapati, Rena; Gregory, Dyanna; Duloy, Anna; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background and study aims:  Colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) assesses skills (fold examination, cleaning, and luminal distension) during inspection for polyps and correlates with adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated detection rate (SDR). We aimed to determine whether providing individualized CIQ feedback with instructional videos improves quality metrics performance. Methods:  We prospectively studied 16 colonoscopists who already received semiannual benchmarked reports of quality metrics (ADR, SDR, and withdrawal time [WT]). We randomly selected seven colonoscopies/colonoscopist for evaluation. Six gastroenterologists graded CIQ using an established scale. We created instructional videos demonstrating optimal and poor inspection techniques. Colonoscopists received the instructional videos and benchmarked CIQ performance. We compared ADR, SDR, and WT in the 12 months preceding (“baseline”) and following CIQ feedback. Colonoscopists were stratified by baseline ADR into lower (≤ 34 %) and higher-performing (> 34 %) groups. Results:  Baseline ADR was 38.5 % (range 26.8 %–53.8 %) and SDR was 11.2 % (2.8 %–24.3 %). The proportion of colonoscopies performed by lower-performing colonoscopists was unchanged from baseline to post-CIQ feedback. All colonoscopists reviewed their CIQ report cards. Post-feedback, ADR (40.1 % vs 38.5 %, P  = 0.1) and SDR (12.2 % vs. 11.2 %, P  = 0.1) did not significantly improve; WT significantly increased (11.4 vs 12.4 min, P  < 0.01). Among the eight lower-performing colonoscopists, group ADR (31.1 % vs 34.3 %, P  = 0.02) and SDR (7.2 % vs 9.1 %, P  = 0.02) significantly increased post-feedback. In higher-performing colonoscopists, ADR and SDR did not change. Conclusions: CIQ feedback modestly improves ADR and SDR among colonoscopists with lower baseline ADR but has no effect on higher-performing colonoscopists. Individualized feedback on colonoscopy skills could be used to improve polyp detection by lower-performing colonoscopists.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    SpHincterotomy for Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis Randomized Trial: Rationale, Methodology, and Potential Implications
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2019-09-01) Coté, Gregory A.; Durkalski-Mauldin, Valerie L.; Serrano, Jose; Klintworth, Erin; Williams, April W.; Cruz-Monserrate, Zobeida; Arain, Mustafa; Buxbaum, James L.; Conwell, Darwin L.; Fogel, Evan L.; Freeman, Martin L.; Gardner, Timothy B.; van Geenen, Erwin; Groce, J. Royce; Jonnalagadda, Sreenivasa S.; Keswani, Rajesh N.; Menon, Shyam; Moffatt, Dana C.; Papachristou, Georgios I.; Ross, Andrew; Tarnasky, Paul R.; Wang, Andrew Y.; Wilcox, C. Mel; Hamilton, Frank; Yadav, Dhiraj; Consortium for the SHARP; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Objectives: In patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP), pancreas divisum, and no other etiologic factors, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy (miES) is often performed to enlarge the minor papillary orifice, based on limited data. The aims of this study are to describe the rationale and methodology of a sham-controlled clinical trial designed to test the hypothesis that miES reduces the risk of acute pancreatitis. Methods: The SpHincterotomy for Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis (SHARP) trial is a multicenter, international, sham-controlled, randomized trial comparing endoscopic ultrasound + ERCP with miES vs. endoscopic ultrasound + sham for the management of ARP. A total of 234 consented patients having two or more discrete episodes of acute pancreatitis, pancreas divisum confirmed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and no other clear etiology for acute pancreatitis will be randomized. Both cohorts will be followed for a minimum of 6 months and maximum of 48 months. Results: The trial is powered to detect a 33% risk reduction of acute pancreatitis frequency. Conclusions: The SHARP trial will determine whether ERCP with miES benefits patients with idiopathic ARP and pancreas divisum. Trial planning has informed the importance of blinded outcome assessors and long-term follow-up.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Transpapillary drainage has no added benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a large multicenter study
    (Elsevier, 2016-04) Yang, Dennis; Amin, Sunil; Gonzalez, Susana; Mullady, Daniel; Hasak, Stephen; Gaddam, Srinivas; Edmundowicz, Steven A.; Gromski, Mark A.; DeWitt, John M.; El Zein, Mohamad; Khashab, Mouen A.; Wang, Andrew Y.; Gaspar, Jonathan P.; Uppal, Dushant S.; Nagula, Satish; Kapadia, Samir; Buscaglia, Jonathan M.; Bucobo, Juan Carlos; Schlachterman, Alex; Wagh, Mihir S.; Draganov, Peter V.; Jung, Min Kyu; Stevens, Tyler; Vargo, John J.; Khara, Harshit S.; Huseini, Mustafa; Diehl, David L.; Keswani, Rajesh N.; Law, Ryan; Komanduri, Srinadh; Yachimski, Patrick S.; DaVee, Tomas; Prabhu, Anoop; Lapp, Robert T.; Kwon, Richard S.; Watson, Rabindra R.; Goodman, Adam J.; Chhabra, Natasha; Wang, Wallace J.; Benias, Petros; Carr-Locke, David L.; DiMaio, Christopher J.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Background and Aims The need for transpapillary drainage (TPD) in patients undergoing transmural drainage (TMD) of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare treatment outcomes between patients with pancreatic pseudocysts undergoing TMD versus combined (TMD and TPD) drainage (CD) and to identify predictors of symptomatic and radiologic resolution. Methods This is a retrospective review of 375 consecutive patients with PFCs who underwent EUS-guided TMD from 2008 to 2014 at 15 academic centers in the United States. Main outcome measures included TMD and CD technical success, treatment outcomes (symptomatic and radiologic resolution) at follow-up, and predictors of treatment outcomes on logistic regression. Results A total of 375 patients underwent EUS-guided TMD of PFCs, of which 174 were pseudocysts. TMD alone was performed in 95 (55%) and CD in 79 (45%) pseudocysts. Technical success was as follows: TMD, 92 (97%) versus CD, 35 (44%) (P = .0001). There was no difference in adverse events between the TMD (15%) and CD (14%) cohorts (P = .23). Median long-term (LT) follow-up after transmural stent removal was 324 days (interquartile range, 72-493 days) for TMD and 201 days (interquartile range, 150-493 days) (P = .37). There was no difference in LT symptomatic resolution (TMD, 69% vs CD, 62%; P = .61) or LT radiologic resolution (TMD, 71% vs CD, 67%; P = .79). TPD attempt was negatively associated with LT radiologic resolution of pseudocyst (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.8; P = .03). Conclusions TPD has no benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided TMD of pancreatic pseudocysts and negatively affects LT resolution of PFCs.