Browsing by Author "Kern, Silke"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein provides differential diagnostic value in some forms of dementias
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Eriksson, Pontus; Skillback, Tobias; Kern, Silke; Jönsson, Linus; Blennow, Kaj; Eriksdotter, Maria; Zetterberg, Henrik; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a marker of cerebral astrogliosis and occasionally elevated in patients with dementia. GFAP in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), is routinely requested in referrals to neurochemistry laboratories; however, its ability to differentiate dementias and diagnostic capability is unclear. Our aim was to elucidate this, using two large datasets. Method: First, GFAP data measured since 2015 was retrieved from the database of the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Sahlgrenska University hospital. We then cross‐referenced with the Swedish dementia registry (SveDem). Here, information on ten different diagnoses such as early onset AD (EAD [<65 years]), late onset AD (LAD [≥65 years]), Parkinson disease with dementia (PDD), vascular dementia (VaD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), each with specific diagnostic criteria, were retrieved. The GFAP data was log10‐transformed, followed by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and a subsequent post‐hoc Tukey’s test, with GFAP as dependent variable, diagnosis as independent variable and sex and age as covariates. Result: In total, 1912 individuals (mean [SD] age, 71.9 [8.2] years; 52% male), were included. Lower log10‐transformed GFAP concentrations were seen in PDD (mean [SD], 2.68, [0.28] pg/mL), than in EAD, LAD, VaD and FTD; here, mean concentrations of 2.76 (0.24), 2.89 (0.23), 2.89 (0.32) and 2.76 (0.25) pg/mL were observed, respectively. In the post hoc analysis, GFAP differentiated VaD from EAD (p<0.001). PDD concentrations were significantly different from VaD (p<0.001) and LAD (p<0.001). Further, it also differentiated FTD from VaD (p=0.006) and LAD (p=0.001). Conclusion: CSF GFAP could on a group level help differentiate VaD from EAD, FTD and PDD. Also, it could differentiate PDD from LAD. These results bear potential clinical relevance, where clinicians in some uncertain cases could use this marker as a differential tool.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The prevalence of tau‐PET positivity in aging and dementia
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Coomans, Emma M.; Groot, Colin; Rowe, Christopher C.; Dore, Vincent; Villemagne, Victor L.; van de Giessen, Elsmarieke; van der Flier, Wiesje M.; Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.; Visser, Pieter Jelle; den Braber, Anouk; Pontecorvo, Michael; Shcherbinin, Sergey; Kennedy, Ian A.; Jagust, William J.; Baker, Suzanne L.; Harrison, Theresa M.; Gispert, Juan Domingo; Shekari, Mahnaz; Minguillon, Carolina; Smith, Ruben; Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas; Palmqvist, Sebastian; Strandberg, Olof; Stomrud, Erik; Malpetti, Maura; O'Brien, John T.; Rowe, James B.; Jäger, Elena; Bischof, Gérard N.; Drzezga, Alexander; Garibotto, Valentina; Frisoni, Giovanni; Peretti, Débora Elisa; Schöll, Michael; Skoog, Ingmar; Kern, Silke; Sperling, Reisa A.; Johnson, Keith A.; Risacher, Shannon L.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Carrillo, Maria C.; Dickerson, Brad C.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Barthel, Henryk; Rullmann, Michael; Messerschmidt, Konstantin; Vandenberghe, Rik; Van Laere, Koen; Spruyt, Laure; Franzmeier, Nicolai; Brendel, Matthias; Gnörich, Johannes; Benzinger, Tammie L. S.; Lagarde, Julien; Sarazin, Marie; Bottlaender, Michel; Villeneuve, Sylvia; Poirier, Judes; Seo, Sang Won; Gu, Yuna; Kim, Jun Pyo; Mormino, Elizabeth; Young, Christina B.; Vossler, Hillary; Rosa-Neto, Pedro; Therriault, Joseph; Rahmouni, Nesrine; Coath, William; Cash, David M.; Schott, Jonathan M.; Rabinovici, Gil D.; La Joie, Renaud; Rosen, Howard J.; Johnson, Sterling C.; Christian, Bradley T.; Betthauser, Tobey J.; Hansson, Oskar; Ossenkoppele, Rik; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background Tau‐PET imaging allows in‐vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles. One tau‐PET tracer (i.e., [18F]flortaucipir) has received FDA‐approval for clinical use, and multiple other tau‐PET tracers have been implemented into clinical trials for participant selection and/or as a primary or secondary outcome measure. To optimize future use of tau‐PET, it is essential to understand how demographic, clinical and genetic factors affect tau‐PET‐positivity rates. Method This large‐scale multi‐center study includes 9713 participants from 35 cohorts worldwide who underwent tau‐PET with [18F]flortaucipir (n = 6420), [18F]RO948 (n = 1999), [18F]MK6240 (n = 878) or [18F]PI2620 (n = 416) (Table‐1). We analyzed individual‐level tau‐PET SUVR data using a cerebellar reference region that were processed either centrally (n = 3855) or by each cohort (n = 5858). We computed cohort‐specific SUVR thresholds based on the mean + 2 standard deviations in a temporal meta‐region of amyloid‐negative cognitively normal (CN) individuals aged >50. Logistic generalized estimating equations were used to estimate tau‐PET‐positivity probabilities, using an exchangeable correlation structure to account for within‐cohort correlations. Analyses were performed with (interactions between) age, amyloid‐status, and APOE‐e4 carriership as independent variables, stratified for syndrome diagnosis. Result The study included 5962 CN participants (7.5% tau‐PET‐positive), 1683 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, 33.8% tau‐PET‐positive) and 2068 participants with a clinical diagnosis of dementia (62.1% tau‐PET‐positive) (Figure‐1). From age 60 to 80 years, the estimated prevalence of tau‐PET‐positivity increased from 1.2% [95% CI: 0.9%‐1.5%] to 3.7% [2.3%‐5.1%] among CN amyloid‐negative participants; and from 16.4% [10.8%‐22.1%] to 20.5% [18.8%‐22.2%] among CN amyloid‐positive participants. Among amyloid‐negative participants with MCI and dementia, from age 60 to 80 years, the estimated prevalence of tau‐PET‐positivity increased from 3.5% [1.6%‐5.3%] to 11.8% [7.1%‐16.5%] and from 12.6% [4.5%‐20.7%] to 15.9% [6.7%‐25.1%] respectively. In contrast, among amyloid‐positive participants with MCI and dementia, from age 60 to 80 years, the estimated prevalence of tau‐PET‐positivity decreased from 66.5% [57.0%‐76.0%] to 48.3% [42.9%‐53.8%] and from 92.3% [88.7%‐95.9%] to 73.4% [67.5%‐79.3%] respectively. APOE‐e4 status primarily modulated the association of age with tau‐PET‐positivity estimates among CN and MCI amyloid‐positive participants (Figure‐2). Conclusion This large‐scale multi‐cohort study provides robust prevalence estimates of tau‐PET‐positivity, which can aid the interpretation of tau‐PET in the clinic and inform clinical trial designs.