Browsing by Author "Kelley, Kristen"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessment of a Universal Preprocedural Screening Program for COVID-19
    (Cambridge, 2021) Dbeibo, Lana; Kuebler, Kari; Keen, Alyson; George, Annie; Kelley, Kristen; Sadowski, Josh; Basham, Laura; Beeson, Terrie; Schmidt, C. Max; Beeler, Cole; Webb, Douglas; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Objectives Study objectives were to: (1) Determine the value of a COVID-19 universal preprocedural screening program; and (2) Using the results of asymptomatic positive screens, determine the safety of resuming elective procedures. Design This was a descriptive study detailing the process and findings from implementation of a COVID-19 universal preprocedural screening program. Setting An adult academic tertiary center in Indiana. Patients Patients were included in the analysis if they were screened 96 hours prior to or within 24 hours after undergoing a procedure in the operating room, cardiac catheterization lab, or endoscopy. Methods A report was generated from the electronic health record of patients undergoing procedures from a six week period of time (May 4th-June 14th, 2020). Health records for positive screens were reviewed and classified as symptomatic if they met either criteria: (1) screen performed due to presence of COVID-19 symptoms; (2) documentation of symptoms at the time of the screen. Patients with a positive screen that did not meet symptomatic criteria were classified as asymptomatic. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate frequencies and percentages for the included sample. Results The initial sample included 2,194 patients, comprised of 46 positive and 2,148 negative screens. Out of the 46 patients who had a positive test, 17 were asymptomatic, resulting in an asymptomatic rate of 0.79% (17/2165). Conclusion Findings validated the value of the program through identification of a low rate of asymptomatic positive screens and procedural team adoption and sustainment. Findings may help inform decision making of like organizations attempting to enhance safety while resuming elective procedures.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical comparison and agreement of PCR, antigen, and viral culture for the diagnosis of COVID-19: Clinical Agreement Between Diagnostics for COVID19
    (Elsevier, 2022) Agard, Amanda; Elsheikh, Omar; Bell, Drew; Relich, Ryan F.; Schmitt, Bryan H.; Sadowski, Josh; Fadel, William; Webb, Douglas H.; Dbeibo, Lana; Kelley, Kristen; Carozza, Mariel; Lei, Guang-Shen; Calkins, Paul; Beeler, Cole; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The aim of this study is to compare the COVID-19 nasopharyngeal PCR (NP PCR) to antigen, nasal PCR, and viral culture. One-hundred-and-fourteen risk-stratified patients were tested by culture, nasal PCR, NP PCR, and Ag testing. Twenty (48%) of the high risk and 23 (32%) of the low risk were NP PCR positive. Compared with NP PCR, the sensitivity of nasal PCR, Sofia Ag, BinaxNOW Ag, and culture were 44%, 31%, 37%, and 15%. In the high risk group, the sensitivity of these tests improved to 71%, 37%, 50%, and 22%. Agreement between tests was highest between nasal PCR and both antigen tests. Patients who were NP PCR positive but antigen negative were more likely to have remote prior COVID-19 infection (p<0.01). Nasal PCR and antigen positive patients were more likely to have symptoms (p = 0.01).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    First Do No Harm - The Indiana Providers Guide to the Safe, Effective Management of Chronic Non-Terminal Pain
    (State of Indiana, 2013) Bell-Sharp, Kim; Gregory, Eigner; Brooks, Tracy L.; Elliott, Alicia; Cragen, Debbie; Ersin, Ozlem H.; Croasdell, Lori; Fernandes, Taya; Duwve, Joan; Fielding, Stephen M.; Gentry, Mark E.; Greene, Marion S.; King, Timothy E.; Kelley, Kristen; Konchalski, Jan; Kuzma, Abigail; LaHood, Amy; MacKie, Palmer J.; McMahan, Deborah; Mowry, James B.; Park, Esther J.; Pontones, Pam; Ring, Barry S.; Robinson, Natalie; Roth, Daniel C.; Rumsey, Todd C.; Schreier, Eric M.; Stone, Cynthia L.; Straub, Tom; Welch, Peggy; Sybesma, J. Michelle; Symmes, Shelly; Whitworth, Michael; Vaught, Cynthia; Weitlauf, Sharon L.; Weaver, Tamara; Zachodni, Carla
    "First Do No Harm: The Indiana Healthcare Providers Guide to the Safe, Effective Management of Chronic Non-Terminal Pain" was developed by the Indiana Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Task Force’s Education Committee under the leadership of Dr. Deborah McMahan. This provider toolkit, based on expert opinion and recognized standards of care, was developed over many months with the input of healthcare providers representing multiple specialties and all corners of the state. First Do No Harm provides options for the safe and responsible treatment of chronic pain, including prescriptions for opioids when indicated, with the ultimate goals of patient safety and functional improvement. It was developed as an interactive compendium to the new Medical Licensing Board rule addressing Opioid Prescribing for Chronic, Non-terminal Pain to give healthcare providers tools they can use to comply with the rule.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Strategies for the successful implementation of disinfecting port protectors to reduce CLABSI in a large tertiary care teaching hospital
    (Elsevier, 2019-12) Beeler, Cole; Kerley, Denise; Davis, Carmen; Hazen, Dana; Snyderman, William; Lyons, Kathy; Sadowski, Josh; Sweeney, Jennifer; Dbeibo, Lana; Kelley, Kristen; Webb, Douglas H.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Disinfecting port protectors are a supplement to the central line–associated bloodstream infection prevention bundle as an optional recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Despite evidence of effectiveness, few centers have successfully reported systematic, sustained implementation of these devices. In this article, we discuss a successful implementation in a large tertiary care teaching hospital, using an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach.