Browsing by Author "Karrison, Theodore G."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical Assessment of 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRABRAX) in Untreated Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Using UGT1A1 Genotype–Guided Dosing
    (American Association for Cancer Research, 2020-01-01) Joshi, Smita S.; Catenacci, Daniel V. T.; Karrison, Theodore G.; Peterson, Jaclyn D.; Zalupski, Mark M.; Sehdev, Amikar; Wade, James; Sadiq, Ahad; Picozzi, Vincent J.; Amico, Andrea; Marsh, Robert; Kozloff, Mark F.; Polite, Blase N.; Kindler, Hedy L.; Sharma, Manish R.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, irinotecan, and nab-paclitaxel are all active agents in gastrointestinal cancers; the combination, FOLFIRABRAX, has not been previously evaluated. UDP Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) clears SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism reduces UGT1A1 enzymatic activity and predisposes to toxicity. We performed a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of FOLFIRABRAX with UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan. Experimental Design: Patients with previously untreated, advanced gastrointestinal cancers received FOLFIRABRAX with prophylactic pegfilgrastim every 14 days. UGT1A1 *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 patients received initial irinotecan doses of 180, 135, and 90 mg/m2, respectively. 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 were administered. Doses were deemed tolerable if the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) rate during cycle 1 was ≤35% in each genotype group. DLTs were monitored using a sequential procedure. Results: Fifty patients enrolled: 30 pancreatic, 9 biliary tract, 6 gastroesophageal, and 5 others. DLTs occurred in 5/23 (22%) *1/*1 patients, 1/19 (5%) *1/*28 patients, and 0/7 *28/*28 patients. DLTs were all grade 3: diarrhea (3 patients), nausea (2 patients), and febrile neutropenia (1 patient). The overall response rate was 31%. Response rates in pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and biliary tract cancers were 34%, 50%, and 11%, respectively. Eighteen patients (36%) received therapy for at least 24 weeks. Conclusion: FOLFIRABRAX with genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan is tolerable in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer and UGT1A1*1*1 or UGT1A1*1*28 genotypes. Too few *28/*28 patients were enrolled to provide conclusive results. Responses occurred across multiple tumor types.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Efficacy of Post-Induction Therapy for High-risk Neuroblastoma Patients with End-Induction Residual Disease
    (Wiley, 2022) Desai, Ami V.; Applebaum, Mark A.; Karrison, Theodore G.; Oppong, Akosua; Yuan, Cindy; Berg, Katherine R.; MacQuarrie, Kyle; Sokol, Elizabeth; Hall, Anurekha G.; Pinto, Navin; Wolfe, Ian; Mody, Rajen; Shusterman, Suzanne; Smith, Valeria; Foster, Jennifer H.; Nassin, Michele; LaBelle, James L.; Bagatell, Rochelle; Cohn, Susan L.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: High-risk neuroblastoma patients with end-induction residual disease commonly receive post-induction therapy in an effort to increase survival by improving response prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). We conducted a multi-center, retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of this approach. Methods: Patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 without progressive disease (PD) with ≤ partial response (PR) at end-induction were stratified according to post-induction treatment: i) no additional therapy prior to ASCT (Cohort 1); ii) post-induction “bridge” therapy prior to ASCT (Cohort 2); and iii) post-induction therapy without ASCT (Cohort 3). Chi-square tests were used to compare patient characteristics. Three-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves were compared by log-rank test. Results: The study cohort consisted of 201 patients; Cohort 1 (n=123); Cohort 2 (n=51); and Cohort 3 (n=27). Although end-induction response was better for Cohort 1 than Cohorts 2 and 3, outcome for Cohort 1 and 2 was not significantly different (EFS; p=0.77 and OS; p=0.85). Inferior outcome was observed for Cohort 3 (EFS; p<0.001 and OS; p=0.06). Among patients with end-induction stable metastatic disease, 3-year EFS was significantly improved for Cohort 2 compared to Cohort 1 (p=0.04). Cohort 3 patients with complete response (CR) in metastatic sites following post-induction therapy had significantly better 3-year EFS compared to those with residual metastatic disease (p=0.01). Conclusions: Prospective studies to confirm the benefits of bridge treatment and the prognostic significance of metastatic response observed in this study are warranted.